Works matching DE "REASONABLE suspicion (Law)"
1
- Alaska Law Review, 2012, v. 29, n. 2, p. 261
- Article
2
- Maryland Law Review, 2024, v. 83, n. 2, p. 609
- Article
3
- Maryland Law Review, 2017, v. 76, n. 3, p. 747
- Article
4
- British Journal of Criminology, 2021, v. 61, n. 2, p. 325, doi. 10.1093/bjc/azaa068
- Fussey, Pete;
- Davies, Bethan;
- Innes, Martin
- Article
5
- British Journal of Criminology, 2018, v. 58, n. 3, p. 588, doi. 10.1093/bjc/azx030
- Article
6
- Boston University Law Review, 2014, v. 94, n. 5, p. 1745
- Article
7
- Texas Hispanic Journal of Law & Policy, 2011, v. 17, n. 1, p. 99
- Article
8
- Emory Law Journal, 2024, v. 73, n. 3, p. 589
- Article
9
- Emory Law Journal, 2023, v. 72, n. 6, p. 1429
- Article
10
- Emory Law Journal, 2023, v. 72, n. 6, p. 1429
- Article
11
- Emory Law Journal, 2012, v. 62, n. 2, p. 259
- Article
12
- University of Arkansas at Little Rock Law Review, 2019, v. 41, n. 3, p. 483
- Article
13
- Missouri Law Review, 2021, v. 86, n. 1, p. 341
- Article
14
- Yale Law Journal, 2014, v. 123, n. 5, p. 1448
- KEENAN, DAVID;
- THOMAS, TINA M.
- Article
15
- Columbia Human Rights Law Review, 2011, v. 43, n. 1, p. 301
- Article
16
- Columbia Human Rights Law Review, 2011, v. 43, n. 1, p. 215
- Article
17
- Criminal Justice Policy Review, 2016, v. 27, n. 7, p. 684, doi. 10.1177/0887403414554996
- Turner, John R.;
- Hemmens, Craig;
- Matz, Adam K.
- Article
18
- Mercer Law Review, 2020, v. 71, n. 4, p. 1149
- Article
19
- Akron Law Review, 2019, v. 53, n. 3, p. 687
- Article
20
- Creighton Law Review, 2023, v. 57, n. 1, p. 91
- Article
21
- Creighton Law Review, 2021, v. 54, n. 2, p. 323
- Article
22
- Creighton Law Review, 2011, v. 45, n. 1, p. 87
- Article
23
- Policing & Society, 2011, v. 21, n. 4, p. 369, doi. 10.1080/10439463.2011.617984
- Article
24
- Wake Forest Law Review, 2013, v. 48, n. 1, p. 1
- Vars, Fredrick E.;
- Young, Amanda Adcock
- Article
25
- North Dakota Law Review, 2021, v. 96, n. 1, p. 63
- Article
26
- North Dakota Law Review, 2020, v. 95, n. 2, p. 399
- Article
27
- California Western Law Review, 2012, v. 48, n. 2, p. 279
- Article
28
- University of Chicago Law Review, 2011, v. 78, n. 3, p. 809
- Harcourt, Bernard E.;
- Meares, Tracey L.
- Article
29
- Maine Law Review, 2012, v. 65, n. 1, p. 345
- Article
30
- California Law Review, 2024, v. 112, p. 1129, doi. 10.15779/Z38SN0155M
- Article
31
- University of Florida Journal of Law & Public Policy, 2020, v. 31, n. 1, p. 137
- Article
32
- Touro Law Review, 2016, v. 32, n. 4, p. 807
- Article
33
- Touro Law Review, 2012, v. 28, n. 3, p. 787
- Article
34
- Touro Law Review, 2012, v. 28, n. 2, p. 787
- Article
35
- Stanford Law Review, 2021, v. 73, n. 3, p. 637
- Rushin, Stephen;
- Edwards, Griffin
- Article
36
- Journal of Criminal Law, 2014, v. 78, n. 3, p. 195, doi. 10.1350/jcla.2014.78.3.911
- Article
37
- Advanced Space Law, 2024, v. 13, p. 64, doi. 10.29202/asl/13/6
- Article
38
- Law of Ukraine / Pravo Ukrainy, 2013, n. 11, p. 120
- Article
39
- FIU Law Review, 2011, v. 6, n. 2, p. 201, doi. 10.25148/lawrev.6.2.5
- Article
40
- William & Mary Bill of Rights Journal, 2017, v. 26, n. 2, p. 383
- Article
41
- William & Mary Bill of Rights Journal, 2012, v. 21, n. 1, p. 1
- Article
42
- Quinnipiac Law Review, 2013, v. 31, n. 2, p. 387
- Article
43
- Iowa Law Review, 2020, v. 105, n. 2, p. 463
- Article
44
- Universul Juridic, 2016, p. 202
- Article
45
- Columbia Law Review, 2015, v. 115, n. 3, p. 701
- Article
46
- Advocate (05154987), 2023, v. 66, n. 3/4, p. 26
- Article
47
- Oregon Law Review, 2012, v. 90, n. 5, p. 1389
- Article
48
- University of Pennsylvania Law Review, 2015, v. 163, n. 2, p. 327
- Article
50
- JQ: Justice Quarterly, 2014, v. 31, n. 6, p. 961, doi. 10.1080/07418825.2012.710646
- Article