Works matching Antitrust law and the Supreme Court
1
- American University Law Review, 2018, v. 68, n. 2, p. 621
- Article
2
- Antitrust Bulletin, 2009, v. 54, n. 1, p. 157, doi. 10.1177/0003603X0905400105
- Article
3
- American Business Law Journal, 1972, v. 9, n. 3, p. 241, doi. 10.1111/j.1744-1714.1971.tb01567.x
- Article
4
- Creighton Law Review, 2004, v. 38, n. 1, p. 155
- Article
5
- Washburn Law Journal, 2014, v. 53, n. 2, p. 365
- Article
6
- Minnesota Law Review, 2021, v. 105, n. 5, p. 2095
- Article
7
- Loyola of Los Angeles Law Review, 2011, v. 44, n. 3, p. 1163
- Article
8
- Österreichische Zeitschrift für Kartellrecht (ÖZK), 2025, v. 18, n. 2, p. 71, doi. 10.33196/oezk202502007101
- Article
9
- Journal of Corporation Law, 2006, v. 31, n. 2, p. 401
- Blair, Roger D.;
- Piette, Christine A.
- Article
10
- Journal of Corporation Law, 2006, v. 31, n. 2, p. 387
- Article
11
- Journal of Corporation Law, 1987, v. 12, n. 4, p. 765
- Article
12
- Journal of Corporation Law, 1981, v. 6, n. 3, p. 681
- Article
13
- William & Mary Business Law Review, 2020, v. 11, n. 3, p. 695
- Article
14
- American Economic Review, 1942, v. 32, p. 432
- Article
15
- U.C. Davis Law Review, 2011, v. 45, n. 2, p. 629
- Article
16
- Tulane Journal of Technology & Intellectual Property, 2013, v. 16, p. 105
- Article
17
- St. John's Law Review, 2015, v. 89, n. 4, p. 1371
- Article
18
- St. John's Law Review, 2015, v. 89, n. 1, p. 101
- DORSEY, ELYSE;
- JACOBSON, JONATHAN M.
- Article
19
- St. John's Law Review, 2008, v. 82, n. 3, p. 1115
- Article
20
- St. John's Law Review, 2005, v. 79, n. 3, p. 733
- Article
21
- American University Law Review, 2016, v. 66, n. 2, p. 415
- Article
22
- San Diego Law Review, 2015, v. 52, n. 3, p. 619
- Article
23
- Harvard Journal of Law & Public Policy, 2010, v. 33, n. 1, p. 6
- Article
24
- Itobiad: Journal of the Human & Social Science Researches / İnsan ve Toplum Bilimleri Araştırmaları Dergisi, 2015, v. 4, n. 1, p. 9, doi. 10.15869/itobiad.66075
- Article
25
- Texas Intellectual Property Law Journal, 2014, v. 22, n. 2, p. 163
- Article
26
- Texas Review of Entertainment & Sports Law, 2005, v. 6, n. 1, p. 1
- Article
27
- Dispute Resolution Journal, 2023, v. 77, n. 1, p. 1
- Laute, A. Alexander;
- Frisch, Imke
- Article
28
- Antitrust Bulletin, 2006, v. 51, n. 2, p. 281
- Article
29
- Arbitration Journal, 1987, v. 42, n. 4, p. 3
- Article
30
- Arbitration Journal, 1970, v. 25, n. 3, p. 216
- Article
31
- American Journal of Law & Medicine, 1982, v. 8, n. 3, p. 321, doi. 10.1017/s0098858800008133
- Article
32
- American Business Law Journal, 1972, v. 10, n. 1, p. 69, doi. 10.1111/j.1744-1714.1972.tb00779.x
- Article
33
- University of Illinois Law Review, 2019, v. 2019, n. 5, p. 1447
- Article
34
- University of Illinois Law Review, 2012, v. 2012, n. 3, p. 879
- Article
36
- George Mason Law Review, 2023, v. 30, n. 4, p. 971
- Article
37
- George Mason Law Review, 2022, v. 29, n. 4, p. 1149
- Article
38
- George Mason Law Review, 2016, v. 23, n. 5, p. 1205
- Edwards, Lindsey M.;
- Wright, Joshua D.
- Article
39
- George Mason Law Review, 2014, v. 21, n. 5, p. 1191
- Article
40
- Southern California Law Review, 2012, v. 85, n. 3, p. 429
- ORBACH, BARAK;
- SOKOL, D. DANIEL
- Article
42
- Journal of Legal Aspects of Sport, 2022, v. 32, n. 1, p. 1, doi. 10.18060/24493
- Article
43
- William & Mary Law Review, 2019, v. 60, n. 4, p. 1439
- Article
44
- William & Mary Law Review, 1997, v. 38, n. 5, p. 1663
- Article
45
- University of Chicago Law Review, 2017, v. 84, n. 4, p. 2059
- Article
46
- Regulation, 2004, v. 27, n. 3, p. 48
- Article
47
- Monthly Labor Review, 1965, v. 88, n. 9, p. 1105
- Article
48
- Michigan Law Review, 2011, v. 110, n. 3, p. 489
- Article
49
- Arizona Law Review, 2014, v. 56, n. 4, p. 1129
- Article
50
- Case Western Reserve Law Review, 2013, v. 64, n. 1, p. 239
- Article