AN AUSTRIAN PERSPECTIVE ON THE LAW OF LIQUIDATED DAMAGES: THE CASE FOR AN ALL-ENFORCEMENT RULE.Published in:Temple Law Review, 2012, v. 84, n. 3, p. 795Publication type:Article
I CONCUR! DO I MATTER?: DEVELOPING A FRAMEWORK FOR DETERMINING THE PRECEDENTIAL INFLUENCE OF CONCURRING OPINIONS.Published in:Temple Law Review, 2012, v. 84, n. 3, p. 743Publication type:Article
WAKE-UP CALL: ELIMINATING THE MAJOR ROADBLOCK THAT CELL PHONE DRIVING CREATES FOR EMPLOYER LIABILITY.Published in:2012Publication type:Opinion
CONSTITUTIONALIZING IMMIGRATION LAW: THE VITAL ROLE OF JUDICIAL DISCRETION IN THE REMOVAL OF LAWFUL PERMANENT RESIDENTS.Published in:Temple Law Review, 2012, v. 84, n. 3, p. 637By:Reyes, Maritza I.Publication type:Article
LOW EXPECTATIONS: HOW CHANGING EXPECTATIONS OF PRIVACY CAN ERODE FOURTH AMENDMENT PROTECTION AND A PROPOSED SOLUTION.Published in:Temple Law Review, 2012, v. 84, n. 3, p. 599By:Baxter, Ten DobbinsPublication type:Article