Works matching DE "DEFENSE attorneys"
1
- University of Chicago Law Review, 2021, v. 88, n. 8, p. 1791
- Article
2
- 2016
- Morrison, Mike;
- DeVaul-Fetters, Amanda;
- Gawronski, Bertram
- journal article
3
- Studia Prawa Publicznego, 2023, v. 43, n. 3, p. 193, doi. 10.14746/spp.2023.3.43.8
- Article
4
- Journal of Contemporary China, 2011, v. 20, n. 70, p. 379, doi. 10.1080/10670564.2011.565172
- Article
5
- Brooklyn Law Review, 2024, v. 89, n. 4, p. 1095
- Article
6
- Brooklyn Law Review, 2022, v. 87, n. 4, p. 1225
- Article
7
- Brooklyn Law Review, 2022, v. 87, n. 4, p. 1105
- Article
8
- Maryland Law Review, 2022, v. 82, n. 1, p. 1
- COLBERT, DOUG;
- STARGER, COLIN
- Article
9
- Journal of Ilahiyat Researches / Ilahiyat Tetkikleri Dergisi, 2022, n. 58, p. 13, doi. 10.5152/ilted.2022.2262150
- Article
10
- Journal of Social Psychology, 2021, v. 161, n. 5, p. 543, doi. 10.1080/00224545.2020.1845593
- Avery, Joseph J.;
- Starck, Jordan;
- Zhong, Yiqiao;
- Avery, Jonathan D.;
- Cooper, Joel
- Article
11
- Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 1990, v. 20, n. 18, p. 1461, doi. 10.1111/j.1559-1816.1990.tb01487.x
- Article
12
- Case Western Reserve Journal of International Law, 2020, v. 52, n. 1/2, p. 479
- Article
13
- Journal of the Professional Lawyer, 2017, p. 65
- Article
14
- Journal of the Professional Lawyer, 2015, p. 157
- Article
15
- Boston University Law Review, 2024, v. 104, n. 7, p. 1963
- Article
17
- Basic & Applied Social Psychology, 2009, v. 31, n. 1, p. 1, doi. 10.1080/01973530802659687
- Tenney, ElizabethR.;
- Cleary, HayleyM. D.;
- Spellman, BarbaraA.
- Article
18
- Review of Litigation, 2021, v. 41, n. 1, p. 1
- Rawicki, Bennett;
- Morgan, Ashbey;
- Scorcio, Matt
- Article
19
- Texas Journal on Civil Liberties & Civil Rights, 2021, v. 27, n. 1, p. 25
- Article
20
- CDS Review, 2020, p. 14
- Article
21
- Oxford University Commonwealth Law Journal, 2014, v. 14, n. 2, p. 321, doi. 10.1080/14729342.2015.1047651
- Hunt, Chris;
- Rankin, Micah
- Article
22
- UMKC Law Review, 2021, v. 89, n. 4, p. 971
- Bough, Stephen R.;
- Case-Halferty, Anne E.
- Article
23
- UMKC Law Review, 2021, v. 89, n. 4, p. 963
- Article
24
- Michigan State Law Review, 2011, v. 2011, n. 3, p. 755
- Johnson, Sheri Lynn;
- Blume, John H.;
- Wilson, Patrick M.
- Article
25
- Michigan State Law Review, 2011, v. 2011, n. 3, p. 541
- Article
27
- Duquesne Law Review, 2013, v. 51, n. 3, p. 633
- Article
30
- Albany Law Review, 2023, v. 87, n. 3, p. 1
- Hartley, Richard D.;
- Freeman, Kelly Roberts;
- Peterson, Bryce
- Article
31
- Albany Law Review, 2020, v. 84, n. 3, p. 579
- Article
32
- Albany Law Review, 2018, v. 82, n. 4, p. 1287
- Article
33
- Albany Law Review, 2015, v. 78, n. 3, p. 1215
- Lee, Cynthia G.;
- Ostrom, Brian J.;
- Kleiman, Matthew
- Article
34
- Albany Law Review, 2014, v. 77, n. 1, p. 9
- Article
35
- Albany Law Review, 2014, v. 77, n. 1, p. 3
- Article
36
- CounterPunch, 2024, p. 1
- Article
37
- CounterPunch, 2023, p. 1
- Article
38
- CounterPunch, 2022, p. 1
- Article
39
- CounterPunch, 2021, p. 1
- Eagan, Eleanor;
- Niederhauser, Dawn
- Article
40
- CounterPunch, 2021, p. 1
- Jaskowiak, Lynn Sutherland;
- Carlson, Steve
- Article
41
- Australian Journal of Forensic Sciences, 2019, v. 51, n. 6, p. 649, doi. 10.1080/00450618.2018.1554090
- Article
42
- Cornell Law Review, 2017, v. 102, n. 2, p. 335
- Article
43
- Virginia Journal of Social Policy & the Law, 2014, v. 21, n. 3, p. 423
- Article
44
- Connecticut Law Review, 2012, v. 44, n. 5, p. 1693
- Article
45
- Family Business Review, 2012, v. 25, n. 4, p. 367, doi. 10.1177/0894486512462327
- Article
46
- Law & History Review, 2023, v. 41, n. 4, p. 683, doi. 10.1017/S0738248023000275
- Article
47
- Yale Law Journal, 2024, v. 133, n. 6, p. 1884
- Article
50
- William & Mary Law Review, 2016, v. 57, n. 4, p. 1549
- Article