Works matching IS 00096881 AND DT 2011 AND VI 79 AND IP 4
Results: 10
FIXING PERLMAN: HOW THE MISAPPLICATION OF A 100-YEAR-OLD DOCTRINE THREATENS TO UNDERMINE MOHAWK INDUSTRIES, INC. V. CARPENTER.
- Published in:
- University of Cincinnati Law Review, 2011, v. 79, n. 4, p. 1631
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
THE HELTER SKELTER APPLICATION OF THE REVERSE PIERCING DOCTRINE.
- Published in:
- University of Cincinnati Law Review, 2011, v. 79, n. 4, p. 1605
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
SEX CHANGES EVERYTHING, BUT THE TRADEMARK DILUTION REVISION ACT SHOULDN'T: V SECRET CATALOGUE, INC. V. MOSELEY AND THE BURDEN OF PROOF IN TRADEMARK DILUTION ACTIONS.
- Published in:
- University of Cincinnati Law Review, 2011, v. 79, n. 4, p. 1583
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
"REGISTRATION… MEANS A REGISTRATION": A CRITIQUE OF THE NINTH CIRCUIT'S ADOPTION OF THE "APPLICATION APPROACH" TO COPYRIGHT REGISTRATION IN COSMETIC IDEAS, INC. V. IAC/INTERACTIVECORP.
- Published in:
- University of Cincinnati Law Review, 2011, v. 79, n. 4, p. 1547
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
INDEFINITE DETENTION OF SPECIALLY DANGEROUS REMOVABLE ALIENS: HERNANDEZ-CARRERA V. CARLSON AND THE IMPORTANCE OF AGENCY DEFERENCE.
- Published in:
- University of Cincinnati Law Review, 2011, v. 79, n. 4, p. 1517
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
POLYAMORY AS A SEXUAL ORIENTATION.
- Published in:
- University of Cincinnati Law Review, 2011, v. 79, n. 4, p. 1461
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
FORCING COOPERATION: A STRATEGY FOR IMPROVING TAX COMPLIANCE.
- Published in:
- University of Cincinnati Law Review, 2011, v. 79, n. 4, p. 1415
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
FROM GAUDIN TO GILES: CONTEXT, EQUITY, AND THE ADMISSION OF "WORDS FROM THE GRAVE" AGAINST THE ACCUSED KILLER.
- Published in:
- University of Cincinnati Law Review, 2011, v. 79, n. 4, p. 1371
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
CONTRACT'S ADAPTATION AND THE ONLINE BARGAIN.
- Published in:
- University of Cincinnati Law Review, 2011, v. 79, n. 4, p. 1327
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
APPLYING THE FOURTH AMENDMENT WHEN DNA COLLECTED FOR ONE PURPOSE IS TESTED FOR ANOTHER.
- Published in:
- University of Cincinnati Law Review, 2011, v. 79, n. 4, p. 1289
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article