Works matching DE "SECRECY (Law)"
1
- Maryland Law Review, 2014, v. 73, n. 4, p. 1060
- Article
3
- International Journal of Intelligence & Counterintelligence, 2003, v. 16, n. 3, p. 524, doi. 10.1080/713830450
- Article
4
- 2015
- NEWHOUSE, GEORGE;
- BARNS, GREG
- Opinion
5
- Asia-Pacific Journal: Japan Focus, 2009, n. 19, p. 2
- Levin, Mark;
- Tice, Virginia
- Article
6
- Boston University Law Review, 2015, v. 95, n. 2, p. 427
- Article
7
- Review of Litigation, 2008, v. 28, n. 1, p. 203
- Article
8
- Media, War & Conflict, 2019, v. 12, n. 1, p. 50, doi. 10.1177/1750635217721135
- Article
9
- Tibetan Review: The Monthly Magazine on all Aspects of Tibet, 2010, v. 45, n. 6, p. 33
- Article
10
- Tibetan Review: The Monthly Magazine on all Aspects of Tibet, 2007, v. 42, n. 7, p. 28
- Article
11
- Connecticut Law Review, 2012, v. 44, n. 5, p. 1617
- Article
12
- William & Mary Law Review, 2016, v. 57, n. 6, p. 2141
- Article
13
- Australian Feminist Law Journal, 2011, v. 35, p. 57, doi. 10.1080/13200968.2011.10854459
- Article
15
- BioScience, 1975, v. 25, n. 6, p. 355, doi. 10.2307/1297144
- Article
16
- Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, 1982, v. 38, n. 8, p. 16
- Article
17
- Journal of Media Law, 2011, v. 3, n. 2, p. 169, doi. 10.5235/175776311799280827
- Article
18
- Journal of Political Philosophy, 2007, v. 15, n. 4, p. 404, doi. 10.1111/j.1467-9760.2007.00283.x
- Article
19
- Cardozo Law Review, 2010, v. 31, n. 5, p. 1437
- Dreyfuss, Rochelle Cooper
- Article
20
- Alabama Law Review, 2012, v. 63, n. 4, p. 667
- Article
21
- Southern California Law Review, 2016, v. 89, n. 5, p. 1203
- Article
22
- British Journalism Review, 2009, v. 20, n. 2, p. 5, doi. 10.1177/0956474809106666
- Article
23
- Creighton Law Review, 2006, v. 39, n. 4, p. 961
- Article
24
- Oxford Economic Papers, 2016, v. 68, n. 1, p. 64, doi. 10.1093/oep/gpv051
- Goy, Frederique;
- Changtao Wang
- Article
25
- Marketing Research, 1995, v. 7, n. 1, p. 45
- Article
26
- International Journal for Crime, Justice & Social Democracy, 2017, v. 6, n. 4, p. 100, doi. 10.5204/ijcjsd.v6i4.429
- Article
27
- Business Ethics Quarterly, 2000, v. 10, n. 3, p. 593
- Block, Walter;
- Kinsella, N. Stephan;
- Hoppe, Hans-Hermann
- Article
28
- Ad Americam, 2015, v. 16, p. 41, doi. 10.12797/AdAmericam.16.2014.16.04
- Article
29
- Pensamiento Constitucional, 2011, v. 16, n. 16, p. 11
- Article
30
- University of Chicago Law Review, 2008, v. 75, n. 1, p. 317
- Article
31
- University of Chicago Law Review, 2008, v. 75, n. 1, p. 245
- Article
32
- Transnational Law & Contemporary Problems, 2011, v. 20, n. 2, p. 539
- Article
33
- Boston College Law Review, 2013, v. 54, n. 1, p. 185
- Article
35
- Ratio Juris, 2009, v. 22, n. 2, p. 197, doi. 10.1111/j.1467-9337.2009.00421.x
- Article
36
- Public Manager, 2009, v. 38, n. 3, p. 75
- Article
38
- William & Mary Environmental Law & Policy Review, 2018, v. 42, n. 2, p. 599
- Article
39
- Florida State University Law Review, 2017, v. 44, n. 2, p. 579
- Article
40
- Colombian Journal of Psychiatry / Revista Colombiana de Psiquiatria, 2009, v. 38, n. 1, p. 177
- Ortegón, Luis Alberto Ramírez
- Article
41
- Iowa Law Review, 2021, v. 106, n. 2, p. 775
- Price II, W. Nicholson;
- Rai, Arti K.
- Article
42
- Columbia Journal of Transnational Law, 2015, v. 53, n. 3, p. 507
- Article
43
- Soundings (13626620), 2009, n. 41, p. 65, doi. 10.3898/136266209787778948
- Article
44
- Sydney Law Review, 2017, v. 39, n. 2, p. 257
- Article
45
- Sydney Law Review, 2013, v. 35, n. 4, p. 809
- Article
46
- IBEROAMERICANA. América Latina - España - Portugal, 2009, n. 35, p. 181
- Article
47
- Canadian Medical Association Journal (CMAJ), 2015, v. 187, n. 12, p. E384, doi. 10.1503/cmaj.109-5114
- Article
48
- International Journal of Evidence & Proof, 2004, v. 8, n. 3, p. 186, doi. 10.1350/ijep.8.3.186.40868
- Article
49
- BYU Journal of Public Law, 2006, v. 21, n. 1, p. 235
- Article
50
- International Journal of Finance & Economics, 2007, v. 12, n. 2, p. 155, doi. 10.1002/ijfe.327
- Article