IMPORTANT IS NOT IMPORTANT ENOUGH: FORCIBLY MEDICATING DEFENDANTS FOR SENTENCING USING THE IMPORTANT INTEREST STANDARD.
- Published in:
- St. John's Law Review, 2016, v. 90, n. 1, p. 137
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
Works matching DE "WASHINGTON v. Harper (Supreme Court case)"
Results: 9
1
2
UNCOMFORTABLY NUMB: THE THIRD CIRCUIT CHECKS STATE'S FORCED MEDICATION POLICY IN DISABILITY RIGHTS NEW JERSEY v. COMMISSIONER, NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES.
- Published in:
- Villanova Law Review, 2017, v. 62, n. 3, p. 581
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
3
Washington v. Harper and Involuntary Psychiatric Medication in Prisons: How Wide the Window?
- Published in:
- Journal of Offender Rehabilitation, 1991, p. 193, doi. 10.1300/j076v16n03_12
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
4
Chapter 665: Changing the Process for the Administration of Involuntary Psychotropic Medications to State Inmates.
- Published in:
- McGeorge Law Review, 2012, v. 43, n. 3, p. 766
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
5
PIERCING THE VEIL OF DANGEROUSNESS IN FORCIBLE MEDICATION: WHY PRETRIAL DETAINEES ARE DUE MORE PROCESS THAN WASHINGTON V. HARPER.
- Published in:
- Syracuse Law Review, 2013, v. 63, n. 3, p. 467
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
6
FORCED ADMINISTRATION OF ANTIPSYCHOTIC DRUGS TO CIVILLY COMMITTED MENTAL PATIENTS IN NEVADA: A REMEDY WITHOUT A CLEAR STATUTORY AUTHORIZATION.
- Published in:
- Nevada Law Journal, 2011, v. 11, n. 3, p. 759
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
7
The Administration of Psychotropic Drugs to Prisoners: State of the Law and Beyond.
- Published in:
- California Law Review, 1990, v. 78, n. 5, p. 1243, doi. 10.2307/3480747
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
8
ENFORCED MEDICATION IN JAILS AND PRISONS: THE NEW ASYLUMS.
- Published in:
- Albany Government Law Review, 2015, v. 8, n. 2, p. 563
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
9
A Primer on Involuntarily Medicating Incompetent Defendants.
- Published in:
- Utah Bar Journal, 2018, v. 31, n. 1, p. 18
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article