Works matching Speedy trial
1
- Capital University Law Review, 2019, v. 47, n. 1, p. 1
- Article
2
- North Dakota Law Review, 2020, v. 95, n. 1, p. 207
- Article
3
- St. John's Law Review, 2002, v. 76, n. 3, p. 657
- Article
4
- Journal of Criminal Law, Criminology & Police Science, 1968, v. 59, n. 2, p. 280
- Article
5
- Journal of International Criminal Justice, 2014, v. 12, n. 4, p. 871, doi. 10.1093/jicj/mqu043
- Article
6
- Case Western Reserve Law Review, 2020, v. 71, n. 1, p. 325
- Article
7
- Case Western Reserve Law Review, 2016, v. 67, n. 1, p. 273
- Article
8
- Iowa Law Review, 2006, v. 92, n. 1, p. 245
- Article
9
- Washington University Journal of Law & Policy, 2013, v. 41, p. 181
- Article
10
- Missouri Law Review, 2011, v. 76, n. 3, p. 971
- Article
11
- Journal of Criminal Law & Criminology (08852731), 1948, v. 39, n. 2, p. 193, doi. 10.2307/1138150
- Article
12
- Washington Law Review, 2014, v. 89, n. 3, p. 709
- Article
13
- Stanford Law Review, 2016, v. 68, n. 2, p. 481
- Article
14
- Columbia Journal of Law & Social Problems, 2015, v. 48, n. 2, p. 223
- Article
15
- Wake Forest Law Review, 2021, v. 56, n. 1, p. 169
- Article
16
- Michigan Law Review, 2016, v. 115, n. 1, p. 135
- Article
17
- Michigan Law Review, 2014, v. 113, n. 2, p. 279
- Article
18
- American Bar Association Journal, 1976, v. 62, n. 7, p. 862
- Article
19
- Washington University Law Review, 2020, v. 97, n. 3, p. 903
- Article
20
- Florida Bar Journal, 2002, v. 76, n. 11, p. 26
- Article
21
- Syracuse Law Review, 2012, v. 62, n. 2, p. 209
- Article
22
- Tulane Law Review, 2014, v. 89, n. 2, p. 491
- Article
23
- California Law Review, 1972, v. 60, n. 3, p. 900
- Article
24
- American Bar Association Journal, 1979, v. 65, n. 9, p. 1282
- Article
25
- American Bar Association Journal, 1979, v. 65, n. 1, p. 23
- Article
26
- American Bar Association Journal, 1978, v. 64, n. 2, p. 175
- Article
27
- Southern Illinois University Law Journal, 2023, v. 47, p. 643
- Article
28
- Constitutional Forum / Forum Constitutionnel, 2017, v. 26, n. 3, p. 1, doi. 10.21991/c9ft21
- Article
29
- North Dakota Law Review, 2018, v. 93, n. 1, p. 193
- Article
30
- Perspectives of Law & Public Administration, 2024, v. 13, n. 2, p. 319, doi. 10.62768/PLPA/2024/13/2/14
- NOMNGANGA, Pumza;
- MASUMBE, Paul S.
- Article
31
- Collected Papers of the Faculty of Law in Split / Zbornik Radova Pravnog Fakulteta u Splitu, 2020, v. 57, n. 1, p. 179, doi. 10.31141/zrpfs.2020.57.135.179
- Article
32
- Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 1987, v. 3, n. 3, p. 229, doi. 10.1007/BF01063830
- Article
33
- Malaysian Journal of Law & Society, 2019, v. 24, p. 47, doi. 10.17576/juum-2019-24-06
- AHMAD, FATIMAH HAJI;
- TAHIR, ZULAZHAR;
- RUSLAN, KHALIL
- Article
34
- Library of Progress-Library Science, Information Technology & Computer, 2024, v. 44, n. 3, p. 7648
- Kumar, Prashant;
- Dixit, Anjali
- Article
35
- Review of Human Rights, 2018, v. 4, n. 1, p. 11, doi. 10.35994/rhr.v4i1.85
- Article
36
- Ateneo Law Journal, 2013, v. 58, n. 2, p. 1
- Article
37
- Cardozo Law Review, 2014, v. 36, n. 2, p. 709
- Article
38
- San Diego Law Review, 2007, v. 44, n. 3, p. 573
- Article
39
- Journal of Criminal Law, Criminology & Police Science, 1970, v. 61, n. 3, p. 352, doi. 10.2307/1141963
- Article
40
- Journal of Criminal Law, Criminology & Police Science, 1960, v. 50, n. 6, p. 565
- Article
41
- Touro Law Review, 2011, v. 26, n. 3, p. 907
- Article
42
- Maine Law Review, 2025, v. 77, n. 1, p. 1
- Article
43
- Duke Law Journal, 2025, v. 74, n. 4, p. 1095
- Article
44
- Crime, Law & Social Change, 2020, v. 74, n. 4, p. 457, doi. 10.1007/s10611-020-09904-3
- Article
45
- Southern California Law Review, 2011, v. 84, n. 3, p. 661
- Article
47
- Villanova Law Review, 2022, v. 67, n. 1, p. 1
- HILDEBRAND, SARA;
- CORDERO, ASHLEY
- Article
48
- Judicature, 2012, v. 95, n. 4, p. 158
- Article
49
- Florida Bar Journal, 2004, v. 78, n. 9, p. 39
- Article
50
- New England Law Review, 2014, v. 48, n. 3, p. 565
- SINGER, JORDAN M.;
- YOUNG, WILLIAM G.
- Article