Works matching DE "JUDICIAL discipline"
2
- Estudios de Derecho, 2012, v. 69, n. 153, p. 215
- Cardona Jiménez, Jorge Eliécer
- Article
3
- Juvenile & Family Court Journal, 2011, v. 62, n. 1, p. 54, doi. 10.1111/j.1755-6988.2010.01056.x
- Article
4
- Juvenile & Family Court Journal, 2011, v. 62, n. 1, p. 32, doi. 10.1111/j.1755-6988.2010.01055.x
- Article
5
- Valparaiso University Law Review, 2019, v. 53, n. 4, p. 1085
- Article
6
- William & Mary Law Review, 2009, v. 51, n. 1, p. 1
- Article
7
- American Bar Association Journal, 1980, v. 66, n. 9, p. 1052
- Article
8
- American Bar Association Journal, 1979, v. 65, n. 11, p. 1616
- Article
9
- American Bar Association Journal, 1979, v. 65, n. 10, p. 1459
- Article
10
- American Bar Association Journal, 1979, v. 65, n. 10, p. 1457
- Article
11
- American Bar Association Journal, 1979, v. 65, n. 1, p. 30
- Article
12
- American Bar Association Journal, 1978, v. 64, n. 9, p. 1332
- Article
13
- American Bar Association Journal, 1978, v. 64, n. 4, p. 525
- Article
14
- American Bar Association Journal, 1977, v. 63, n. 9, p. 1181
- Article
15
- American Bar Association Journal, 1977, v. 63, n. 6, p. 778
- Article
16
- American Bar Association Journal, 1976, v. 62, n. 10, p. 1340
- Article
17
- American Bar Association Journal, 1975, v. 61, n. 3, p. 324
- Article
19
- Parliamentarian, 2005, v. 86, n. 4, p. 403
- Article
20
- Judicial Review, 2010, v. 15, n. 4, p. 337, doi. 10.5235/108546810794046403
- Sunkin, Maurice;
- Platt, Lucinda;
- Calvo, Kerman
- Article
21
- European Law Journal, 2021, v. 27, n. 1-3, p. 312, doi. 10.1111/eulj.12441
- Article
22
- Capital University Law Review, 2013, v. 41, n. 4, p. 949
- Article
23
- Yale Law & Policy Review, 2012, v. 31, n. 1, p. 33
- Article
24
- Bench & Bar of Minnesota, 2018, v. 75, n. 11, p. 20
- WERNZ, WILLIAM J.;
- BOESHANS, SARA
- Article
25
- Bench & Bar of Minnesota, 2016, v. 73, n. 10, p. 16
- Article
26
- Bench & Bar of Minnesota, 2011, v. 68, n. 5, p. 40
- Article
27
- Yale Law Journal, 2010, v. 120, n. 3, p. 529
- Article
28
- Yale Law Journal, 2010, v. 120, n. 3, p. 515
- Article
29
- Touro Law Review, 2012, v. 28, n. 2, p. 1073
- Article
30
- Dalhousie Law Journal, 2011, v. 34, n. 2, p. 165
- Article
31
- Hofstra Law Review, 2013, v. 41, n. 3, p. 603
- Article
32
- University of Chicago Law Review, 2008, v. 75, n. 2, p. 853
- Article
33
- Law & Contemporary Problems, 1970, v. 35, n. 1, p. 3
- Article
34
- American Economic Review, 2012, v. 102, n. 1, p. 202, doi. 10.1257/aer.102.1.202
- Iaryczower, Matias;
- Shum, Matthew
- Article
35
- Utah Bar Journal, 2021, v. 34, n. 5, p. 12
- Article
36
- Civitas - Revista de Ciências Sociais, 2010, v. 10, n. 2, p. 270, doi. 10.15448/1984-7289.2010.2.6491
- Article
37
- Journal of the Missouri Bar, 2010, v. 66, n. 2, p. 61
- Article
38
- American University Journal of Gender, Social Policy & the Law, 2014, v. 23, n. 1, p. 23
- Article
39
- Judges' Journal, 2018, v. 57, n. 4, p. 19
- Article
40
- Judges' Journal, 2018, v. 57, n. 4, p. 14
- Article
41
- Judges' Journal, 2013, v. 52, n. 2, p. 40
- Article
42
- Judges' Journal, 2009, v. 48, n. 1, p. 39
- Article
43
- Stanford Law Review, 2012, v. 64, n. 4, p. 1021
- Article
44
- Family Court Review, 2015, v. 53, n. 2, p. 203, doi. 10.1111/fcre.12144
- Article
45
- Studia Universitatis Babes-Bolyai, Philosophia, 2017, v. 62, n. 1, p. 5
- CHIŞ, ANDREA-ANNAMARIA;
- COPOERU, ION
- Article
46
- Northwestern University Law Review, 2020, v. 115, n. 3, p. 953
- Article
47
- SMU Law Review, 2012, v. 65, n. 4, p. 845
- Article
48
- Australian Feminist Studies, 2004, v. 19, n. 44, p. 145, doi. 10.1080/0816464042000226474
- Article
49
- Tennessee Bar Journal, 2013, v. 49, n. 6, p. 7
- Article
50
- Tennessee Bar Journal, 2012, v. 48, n. 3, p. 7
- Article