Works matching DE "JURY nullification"
1
- Michigan Law Review, 2017, v. 115, n. 5, p. 585, doi. 10.36644/mlr.115.5.bail
- Article
2
- Michigan Law Review, 1999, v. 97, n. 8, p. 2381, doi. 10.2307/1290190
- Article
3
- Boston University Law Review, 2011, v. 91, n. 5, p. 1597
- Article
4
- New York Law School Law Review, 2011, v. 55, n. 4, p. 941
- Article
5
- William & Mary Law Review, 2015, v. 56, n. 6, p. 2175
- Article
6
- Legal Theory, 2013, v. 19, n. 3, p. 217, doi. 10.1017/S135232521300013X
- Article
7
- National Security Law Brief, 2011, v. 2, n. 1, p. 89
- Article
8
- Washington University Journal of Law & Policy, 2010, v. 34, p. 347
- Article
9
- Cornell Law Review, 2013, v. 98, n. 3, p. 711
- Article
10
- Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 1991, v. 21, n. 17, p. 1379, doi. 10.1111/j.1559-1816.1991.tb00477.x
- Wiener, Richard L.;
- Habert, Kristen;
- Shkodriani, Gina;
- Staebler, Caryn
- Article
11
- Case Western Reserve Law Review, 2000, v. 50, n. 3, p. 599
- Article
12
- San Diego Law Review, 2022, v. 59, n. 3, p. 437
- Article
13
- Yale Journal of Law & the Humanities, 2012, v. 24, n. 1, p. 433
- Article
14
- Journal of the American Institute of Criminal Law & Criminology, 1914, v. 4, n. 5, p. 646
- Article
15
- California Western Law Review, 2016, v. 52, n. 2, p. 163
- Article
16
- Theory & Decision, 2017, v. 83, n. 3, p. 385, doi. 10.1007/s11238-017-9604-1
- Article
17
- Brigham Young University Law Review, 2013, v. 2013, n. 4, p. 1102
- Article
18
- Behavioral Sciences & the Law, 1993, v. 11, n. 1, p. 97, doi. 10.1002/bsl.2370110108
- Article
19
- Mercer Law Review, 2019, v. 70, n. 2, p. 565
- Article
20
- Hofstra Law Review, 2014, v. 42, n. 4, p. 1125
- Article
21
- University of Chicago Law Review, 2011, v. 78, n. 4, p. 1133
- Article
22
- Law & Contemporary Problems, 2010, v. 73, n. 1, p. 25
- Article
23
- Law & Contemporary Problems, 1980, v. 43, n. 4, p. 51, doi. 10.2307/1191378
- SCHEFLIN, ALAN;
- VAN DYKE, JOY
- Article
24
- Columbia Law Review, 2015, v. 115, n. 5, p. 1255
- Article
25
- Columbia Law Review, 2006, v. 106, n. 4, p. 959
- Article
26
- Utah Bar Journal, 2012, v. 25, n. 5, p. 34
- Article
27
- Boston College Law Review, 2013, v. 54, n. 2, p. 861
- Article
28
- Boston College Law Review, 2011, v. 52, n. 4, p. 1243
- Article
29
- Faulkner Law Review, 2011, v. 3, n. 1, p. 109
- Article
30
- Cardozo International & Comparative Law Review, 2021, v. 5, n. 2, p. 435
- Article
31
- Romanian Review of Private Law / Revista Română de Drept Privat, 2011, n. 2, p. 171
- Article
32
- Journal of Intercultural Disciplines, 2013, v. 13, p. 88
- Berry, Floyd;
- Molina-Moore, Tammy
- Article
33
- Journal of the Faculty of Divinity of Dokuz Eylul University, 2010, n. 32, p. 9
- Article
34
- University of Toronto Law Journal, 2011, v. 61, n. 4, p. 579, doi. 10.3138/utlj.61.4.579
- Article
35
- Criminal Law & Philosophy, 2018, v. 12, n. 1, p. 1, doi. 10.1007/s11572-016-9407-4
- Article
36
- Washington Law Review, 2020, v. 95, n. 3, p. 1441
- Article
37
- Texas Law Review, 2005, v. 83, n. 5, p. 1399
- Article
38
- New York University Law Review, 2021, v. 96, n. 1, p. 173
- Article
40
- Behavioral Sciences & the Law, 2011, v. 29, n. 3, p. 395, doi. 10.1002/bsl.969
- Reichert, Jenny;
- Miller, Monica K.;
- Bornstein, Brian H.;
- Shelton, Hon. Donald E.
- Article
41
- Freeman: Ideas on Liberty, 2011, v. 61, n. 5, p. 35
- Article
42
- Air Force Law Review, 2019, v. 80, p. 1
- Article
43
- Journal of Competition Law & Economics, 2023, v. 19, n. 2, p. 312, doi. 10.1093/joclec/nhad005
- Article
44
- Alabama Law Review, 2019, v. 71, n. 2, p. 576
- Article
45
- Alabama Law Review, 2015, v. 66, n. 4, p. 825
- Article
46
- North Dakota Law Review, 2012, v. 88, n. 2, p. 409
- Article
47
- Military Law Review, 2015, v. 223, p. 100
- Article