Opening the Door but Keeping the Lights Off: Kumho Tire Co. v. Carmichael and the Applicability of the Daubert Test to Nonscientific Evidence.Published in:Case Western Reserve Law Review, 1999, v. 50, n. 1, p. 177By:de Vyver, K. IsaacPublication type:Article
Nowhere to Run, Nowhere to Hide: Augusto Pinochet, Universal Jurisdiction, the ICC, and a Wake-Up Call for Former Heads of State.Published in:Case Western Reserve Law Review, 1999, v. 50, n. 1, p. 127By:White, Jamison G.Publication type:Article
Ghosts Of The Holocaust: Holocaust Victim Fine Arts Litigation And A Statutory Application Of The Discovery Rule[a].Published in:Case Western Reserve Law Review, 1999, v. 50, n. 1, p. 87By:Schlegelmilch, Stephan J.Publication type:Article
When different means the same: Applying a different standard of proof to white plaintiffs under the McDonnell Douglas prima facie case test.Published in:Case Western Reserve Law Review, 1999, v. 50, n. 1, p. 53By:Onwuachi-Willig, AngelaPublication type:Article
Should the courts incorporate a best evidence rule into the standard determining the admissibility of scientific testimony?: Enough is enough even when it is not the best.Published in:Case Western Reserve Law Review, 1999, v. 50, n. 1, p. 19By:Imwinkelried, Edward J.Publication type:Article
Under shelter of confidentiality[1].Published in:Case Western Reserve Law Review, 1999, v. 50, n. 1, p. 1By:Hazard Jr., Geoffrey C.Publication type:Article