Works matching Access control of public records
1
- Records Management Quarterly (1986), 1990, v. 24, n. 3, p. 42
- Article
2
- Roger Williams University Law Review, 2017, v. 22, n. 3, p. 880
- Article
3
- Widener Law Journal, 2014, v. 23, n. 2, p. 571
- Article
4
- Widener Law Journal, 2014, v. 23, n. 2, p. 539
- Article
5
- Widener Law Journal, 2014, v. 23, n. 2, p. 523
- Article
6
- Widener Law Journal, 2014, v. 23, n. 2, p. 505
- Article
7
- Widener Law Journal, 2014, v. 23, n. 2, p. 475
- Article
8
- Widener Law Journal, 2011, v. 21, n. 1, p. 137
- Article
9
- Public Administration Review, 1968, v. 28, n. 6, p. 509, doi. 10.2307/973328
- Article
11
- New York University Law Review, 2011, v. 86, n. 6, p. 1814
- Schwartz, Paul M.;
- Solove, Daniel J.
- Article
12
- Maryland Law Review, 2012, v. 71, n. 3, p. 772
- Conley, Amanda;
- Datta, Anupam;
- Helen, Nissenbaum;
- Sharma, Divya
- Article
13
- Urban Lawyer, 2012, v. 44, n. 1, p. 282
- Article
14
- Zeitschrift für Geschichtswissenschaft, 2012, v. 60, n. 5, p. 441
- Article
15
- Global Media Journal: Indian Edition, 2010, p. 80
- Article
16
- Global Media Journal: Indian Edition, 2010, p. 58
- Article
17
- Global Media Journal: Indian Edition, 2010, p. 56
- Article
18
- Global Media Journal: Indian Edition, 2010, p. 1
- Article
19
- Washington University Journal of Law & Policy, 2015, v. 47, p. 131
- Article
20
- Syracuse Law Review, 2017, v. 67, n. 1, p. 191
- Article
21
- Cardozo Law Review, 2016, v. 37, n. 3, p. 891
- Article
23
- American Bar Association Journal, 1981, v. 67, n. 3, p. 269
- Article
24
- American Bar Association Journal, 1979, v. 65, n. 9, p. 1288
- Article
25
- American Bar Association Journal, 1978, v. 64, n. 4, p. 533
- Article
26
- History Australia, 2009, v. 6, n. 2, p. 43.1, doi. 10.2104/ha090043
- Article
27
- Florida Bar Journal, 2017, v. 91, n. 3, p. 30
- Article
28
- Florida Bar Journal, 2016, v. 90, n. 9, p. 30
- Article
30
- Newspaper Research Journal, 2004, v. 25, n. 4, p. 95, doi. 10.1177/073953290402500410
- Article
31
- Nature Immunology, 2002, v. 3, n. 12, p. 1113, doi. 10.1038/ni1202-1113
- Darlow, John M.;
- Stott, David I.
- Article
32
- Library Philosophy & Practice, 2010, p. 1
- Article
33
- Elon Law Review, 2017, v. 9, n. 1, p. 23
- Article
34
- Northwestern University Law Review, 2013, v. 108, n. 1, p. 343
- Article
35
- Journal of Radio Studies, 2007, v. 14, n. 2, p. 178, doi. 10.1080/10955040701583288
- Smith, Mark;
- Clark, Elizabeth
- Article
36
- Journal of Interactive Marketing, 2001, v. 15, n. 1, p. 33, doi. 10.1002/1520-6653(200124)15:1<33::AID-DIR1002>3.0.CO;2-R
- Phelps, Joseph E.;
- Bunker, Matthew D.
- Article
37
- University of Illinois Law Review, 2017, v. 2017, n. 4, p. 1385
- Article
38
- Berkeley Technology Law Journal, 2009, v. 24, n. 3, p. 1019
- Article
39
- Texas Tech Law Review, 2018, v. 50, n. 2, p. 249
- Article
40
- Government Technology, 2010, v. 23, n. 2, p. 50
- Article
41
- Government Technology, 2008, v. 21, n. 9, p. 58
- Article
42
- Family Court Review, 2001, v. 39, n. 2, p. 223, doi. 10.1111/j.174-1617.2001.tb00606.x
- Article
43
- Family Court Review, 2001, v. 39, n. 1, p. 85, doi. 10.1111/j.174-1617.2001.tb00596.x
- Article
44
- California Law Review, 1956, v. 44, n. 2, p. 305, doi. 10.2307/3478732
- Article
45
- University of Cincinnati Law Review, 2017, v. 85, n. 3, p. 815
- Article
46
- Arhivski Vjesnik, 2006, n. 49, p. 78
- Article
47
- Public Sector, 2008, v. 31, n. 1, p. 4
- Article
48
- Hoover Digest: Research & Opinion on Public Policy, 2016, n. 4, p. 133
- Article
49
- Surveying & Land Information Science, 2006, v. 66, n. 4, p. 279
- Article
50
- Journal of Library Administration, 2015, v. 55, n. 2, p. 92, doi. 10.1080/01930826.2014.995543
- Million, A. J.;
- S. Bossaller, Jenny
- Article