Works matching Right to counsel
1
- JQ: Justice Quarterly, 2010, v. 27, n. 5, p. 713, doi. 10.1080/07418820903292292
- Feld, BarryC.;
- Schaefer, Shelly
- Article
2
- Pravnik, Law & Society Review, 2020, v. 54, n. 106, p. 202
- Article
3
- Criminology & Public Policy, 2010, v. 9, n. 2, p. 327, doi. 10.1111/j.1745-9133.2010.00631.x
- Feld, Barry C.;
- Schaefer, Shelly
- Article
4
- Western Journal of Legal Studies, 2015, v. 5, n. 4, p. 1
- Article
5
- Washington & Lee Law Review, 2018, v. 75, n. 2, p. 703
- Article
6
- Notre Dame Journal of Law, Ethics & Public Policy, 2021, v. 35, n. 1, p. 325
- Article
7
- St. John's Law Review, 2006, v. 80, n. 1, p. 389
- Article
8
- Albany Law Review, 2021, v. 85, n. 4, p. 201
- Duffy, Colleen D.;
- Gray, Melany
- Article
10
- California Law Review, 1974, v. 62, n. 2, p. 512
- Article
11
- California Law Review, 1965, v. 53, n. 1, p. 337, doi. 10.2307/3479099
- Article
12
- Harvard Law & Policy Review, 2021, v. 15, n. 2, p. 625
- Article
13
- Bifocal, 2021, v. 42, n. 4, p. 1
- Pollock, John;
- Rusciano, Megan
- Article
14
- Western New England Law Review, 2017, v. 39, n. 2, p. 309
- Finegan, Susan M.;
- Gal, Laura W.
- Article
15
- Western New England Law Review, 2012, v. 34, n. 1, p. 163
- Article
18
- Syracuse Law Review, 2014, v. 64, n. 3, p. 357
- Article
19
- New Mexico Law Review, 2013, v. 43, n. 1, p. 1
- Article
20
- Missouri Law Review, 2017, v. 82, n. 1, p. 133
- Article
21
- Missouri Law Review, 2015, v. 80, n. 3, p. 771
- Article
22
- Cardozo Law Review, 2019, v. 41, n. 1, p. 317
- Article
23
- Cardozo Law Review, 2013, v. 35, n. 2, p. 831
- Article
24
- Developments in Mental Health Law, 2013, v. 32, n. 1, p. 14
- Article
25
- University of Louisville Law Review, 2017, v. 55, n. 1, p. 105
- Article
26
- SA: Sociological Analysis, 1989, v. 50, n. 3, p. 673
- Article
27
- Pace Law Review, 2010, v. 30, n. 4, p. 1299, doi. 10.58948/2331-3528.1740
- Article
28
- Northwestern University Law Review, 2003, v. 97, n. 4, p. 1635
- Article
29
- Iowa Law Review, 2014, v. 99, n. 5, p. 2219
- Article
30
- Iowa Law Review, 2014, v. 99, n. 5, p. 2131
- Article
31
- Iowa Law Review, 2014, v. 99, n. 5, p. 1999
- Article
32
- Iowa Law Review, 2014, v. 99, n. 5, p. 1905
- Article
33
- Iowa Law Review, 2011, v. 96, n. 2, p. 669
- Article
34
- Minnesota Law Review, 2023, v. 107, n. 3, p. 1129
- Article
35
- Texas Tech Law Review, 2012, v. 45, n. 1, p. 163
- Article
36
- Washington & Lee Law Review, 2017, v. 74, n. 3, p. 1743
- Article
37
- Washington & Lee Law Review, 2013, v. 70, n. 2, p. 1309
- Article
38
- Washington & Lee Law Review, 2013, v. 70, n. 2, p. 1133
- Article
39
- Washington & Lee Law Review, 2013, v. 70, n. 2, p. 839
- Article
40
- William & Mary Law Review, 2003, v. 45, n. 2, p. 782
- Article
41
- University of Cincinnati Law Review, 2025, v. 93, n. 3, p. 920
- Article
42
- Stanford Journal of Civil Rights & Civil Liberties, 2024, v. 20, n. 1, p. 101
- Article
43
- St. Thomas Law Review, 2013, v. 25, n. 3, p. 373
- Article
44
- American University Law Review, 2013, v. 63, n. 1, p. 219
- Article
45
- Columbia Human Rights Law Review, 2014, v. 45, n. 3, p. 772
- Kaufman, Risa E.;
- Davis, Martha F.;
- Wegleitner, Heidi M.
- Article
46
- Appeal: Review of Current Law & Law Reform, 2019, v. 24, p. 79
- Article
47
- Loyola of Los Angeles Law Review, 2019, v. 52, n. 4, p. 463
- Article
48
- Arkansas Law Review (1968-present), 2013, v. 66, n. 4, p. 931
- Article
49
- San Diego Law Review, 2007, v. 44, n. 3, p. 525
- Article
50
- Tennessee Law Review, 2011, v. 78, n. 2, p. 589
- Article