Indigent Defense, Mandatory Minimum Sentences and an Update.
- Published in:
- Tennessee Bar Journal, 2013, v. 49, n. 11, p. 25
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
Works matching Mandatory minimum sentences
Results: 243
1
2
TRIAL BY LEGISLATURE: WHY STATUTORY MANDATORY MINIMUM SENTENCES VIOLATE THE SEPARATION OF POWERS DOCTRINE.
- Published in:
- Boston University Public Interest Law Journal, 2010, v. 19, n. 2, p. 285
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
3
Memorandum on Charging Mandatory Minimum Sentences and Recidivist Enhancements in Certain Drug Cases.
- Published in:
- Federal Sentencing Reporter (University of California Press), 2013, v. 26, n. 2, p. 80, doi. 10.1525/fsr.2013.26.2.80
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
4
Booker Five Years Out: Mandatory Minimum Sentences and Department of Justice Charging Policies Continue to Distort the Federal Sentencing Process.
- Published in:
- Federal Sentencing Reporter (University of California Press), 2009, v. 22, n. 2, p. 96, doi. 10.1525/fsr.2009.22.2.96
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
5
TESTIMONY ON MANDATORY MINIMUM SENTENCES.
- Published in:
- Boston College Law Review, 2021, v. 62, n. 8, p. 2693
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
6
Planting the Yardstick: The Approach to Mandatory Minimum Sentences and the High Court Appeals in Delzotto and Hurt.
- Published in:
- Sydney Law Review, 2023, v. 45, n. 3, p. 411
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
7
Return to Smith? Harper-Era Mandatory Minimum Sentences in Canadian Courts (2008-2023).
- Published in:
- Ottawa Law Review, 2024, v. 55, n. 2, p. 331
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
8
THE IMPORTANCE OF DRUG QUANTITY IN FEDERAL SENTENCING: HOW CIRCUIT COURTS SHOULD DETERMINE THE MANDATORY MINIMUM SENTENCE FOR CONSPIRACY TO DISTRIBUTE CONTROLLED SUBSTANCES IN LIGHT OF UNITED STATES V. STODDARD.
- Published in:
- University of Cincinnati Law Review, 2018, v. 87, n. 4, p. 1
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
9
A Tale of Two Countries: Constitutionalizing the Mandatory Minimum Sentence.
- Published in:
- Manitoba Law Journal, 2021, v. 44, n. 5, p. 149
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
10
CRIMINAL LAW--SENTENCING--MANDATORY MINIMUM SENTENCES.
- Published in:
- North Dakota Law Review, 2020, v. 95, n. 2, p. 389
- Publication type:
- Article
11
CRUEL, UNUSUAL, AND CONSTITUTIONALLY INFIRM: MANDATORY MINIMUM SENTENCES IN CANADA.
- Published in:
- Appeal: Review of Current Law & Law Reform, 2018, v. 23, p. 89
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
12
ERASED: STATE BURGLARY CONVICTIONS AS VIOLENT FELONIES UNDER THE ARMED CAREER CRIMINAL ACT.
- Published in:
- North Dakota Law Review, 2018, v. 93, n. 2, p. 425
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
13
The Dangerous Myths of NAAUSA: A Response to the National Association of Assistant U.S. Attroneys' Paper Titled "The Dangerous Myths of Drug Sentencing 'Reform'".
- Published in:
- Federal Sentencing Reporter (University of California Press), 2015, v. 28, n. 1, p. 24, doi. 10.1525/fsr.2015.28.1.24
- Publication type:
- Article
14
Correcting Course: Lessons from the 1970 Repeal of Mandatory Minimums.
- Published in:
- Federal Sentencing Reporter (University of California Press), 2008, v. 21, n. 1, p. 55, doi. 10.1525/fsr.2008.21.1.55
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
15
Statement of Ricardo H. Hinojosa before the House Judiciary Committee Subcommittee on Crime, Terrorism, and Homeland Security.
- Published in:
- Federal Sentencing Reporter (University of California Press), 2007, v. 19, n. 5, p. 335, doi. 10.1525/fsr.2007.19.5.335
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
16
Statement on Behalf of the Judicial Conference of the United States from U.S. District Judge Paul Cassell before the House Judiciary Committee Subcommittee on Crime, Terrorism, and Homeland Security.
- Published in:
- Federal Sentencing Reporter (University of California Press), 2007, v. 19, n. 5, p. 344, doi. 10.1525/fsr.2007.19.5.344
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
17
Sentencing for Sexual Offences Against Children and Youth: Mandatory Minimums, Proportionality and Unintended Consequences.
- Published in:
- Queen's Law Journal, 2019, v. 44, n. 2, p. 284
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
18
After State v. Lyle: How the Iowa Supreme Court Maintained Mandatory Minimum Sentences for Juvenile Criminal Offenders Despite Recognizing Their Unconstitutional Nature.
- Published in:
- Iowa Law Review, 2022, v. 107, n. 4, p. 1801
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
19
Reacting to the Judicial Revolt: Applying Innovations in Narcotics Sentencing to Federal Non-Production Child Pornography Cases.
- Published in:
- Columbia Journal of Law & Social Problems, 2013, v. 47, n. 1, p. 31
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
20
How Mandatory Are Mandatory Minimums? How Judges Can Avoid Imposing Mandatory Minimum Sentences.
- Published in:
- American Journal of Criminal Law, 2008, v. 36, n. 1, p. 1
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
21
Reconsidering the Constitutionality of Mandatory Minimum Sentences for Children in Jamaica.
- Published in:
- Journal of Arts Science & Technology, 2019, v. 12, n. 1, p. 69
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
22
Remodeling American Sentencing: A Ten-Step Blueprint for Moving Past Mass Incarceration.
- Published in:
- Criminology & Public Policy, 2014, v. 13, n. 4, p. 503, doi. 10.1111/1745-9133.12097
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
23
HABITUALLY OFFENDING THE CONSTITUTION: THE CRUEL AND UNUSUAL CONSEQUENCES OF HABITUAL OFFENDER LAWS AND MANDATORY MINIMUMS.
- Published in:
- George Mason University Civil Rights Law Journal, 2017, v. 28, n. 1, p. 97
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
24
FROM ALTERNATIVE TO THE NEW NORMAL.
- Published in:
- 2014
- By:
- Publication type:
- Case Study
25
More law and order on the run.
- Published in:
- Alternative Law Journal, 2014, v. 39, n. 1, p. 50, doi. 10.1177/1037969X1403900113
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
26
QUEENSLAND.
- Published in:
- Alternative Law Journal, 2013, v. 38, n. 4, p. 278
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
27
EVERYDAY SENTENCING REFORM.
- Published in:
- UMKC Law Review, 2018, v. 87, n. 1, p. 159
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
28
AGAINST THESE GUIDELINES.
- Published in:
- UMKC Law Review, 2018, v. 87, n. 1, p. 49
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
29
Eighth Amendment Differentness.
- Published in:
- Missouri Law Review, 2013, v. 78, n. 3, p. 1053
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
30
Decoupling Federal Offense Guidelines from Statutory Limits on Sentencing.
- Published in:
- Missouri Law Review, 2013, v. 78, n. 3, p. 683
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
31
Reforming Mandatory Minimum Sentences in Connecticut.
- Published in:
- Federal Sentencing Reporter (University of California Press), 2002, v. 15, n. 1, p. 10, doi. 10.1525/fsr.2002.15.1.10
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
32
THE FIRST STEP ACT IS ACTUALLY THE "NEXT STEP" AFTER FIFTEEN YEARS OF SUCCESSFUL REFORMS TO THE FEDERAL CRIMINAL JUSTICE SYSTEM.
- Published in:
- Cardozo Law Review, 2019, v. 41, n. 1, p. 189
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
33
Johnson: Remembrance of Illegal Sentences Past.
- Published in:
- Federal Sentencing Reporter (University of California Press), 2015, v. 28, n. 1, p. 58, doi. 10.1525/fsr.2015.28.1.58
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
34
Resentencing in the Shadow of Johnson v. United States.
- Published in:
- Federal Sentencing Reporter (University of California Press), 2015, v. 28, n. 1, p. 45, doi. 10.1525/fsr.2015.28.1.45
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
35
Different Perspectives on a Different Form of Federal Sentencing.
- Published in:
- Federal Sentencing Reporter (University of California Press), 2014, v. 27, n. 2, p. 63, doi. 10.1525/fsr.2014.27.2.63
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
36
Alleyne on the Ground: Factfinding that Limits Eligibility for Probation or Parole Release.
- Published in:
- Federal Sentencing Reporter (University of California Press), 2014, v. 26, n. 5, p. 287, doi. 10.1525/fsr.2014.26.5.287
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
37
The Reform Commission.
- Published in:
- Federal Sentencing Reporter (University of California Press), 2014, v. 26, n. 4, p. 258, doi. 10.1525/fsr.2014.26.4.258
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
38
A Perspective on the Proposed Amendments to the Drug Distribution Guideline.
- Published in:
- Federal Sentencing Reporter (University of California Press), 2014, v. 26, n. 4, p. 252, doi. 10.1525/fsr.2014.26.4.252
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
39
Impact Estimates of DOJ Policy Changes and Proposed Legislation Regarding Mandatory Minimums.
- Published in:
- Federal Sentencing Reporter (University of California Press), 2013, v. 26, n. 2, p. 88, doi. 10.1525/fsr.2013.26.2.88
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
40
A Cynic's Guide to All the Federal Sentencing Reform Buzz.
- Published in:
- Federal Sentencing Reporter (University of California Press), 2013, v. 26, n. 2, p. 73, doi. 10.1525/fsr.2013.26.2.73
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
41
Punitiveness Towards Users of Illicit Drugs: A Disparity between Actual and Perceived Attitudes.
- Published in:
- Federal Sentencing Reporter (University of California Press), 2012, v. 24, n. 3, p. 217, doi. 10.1525/fsr.2012.24.3.217
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
42
Congressional Activities Affecting Federal Sentencing Policy.
- Published in:
- Federal Sentencing Reporter (University of California Press), 2010, v. 23, n. 2, p. 106, doi. 10.1525/fsr.2010.23.2.106
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
43
More Than Numbers: A Proposal for Rational Drug Sentences.
- Published in:
- Federal Sentencing Reporter (University of California Press), 2007, v. 19, n. 5, p. 326, doi. 10.1525/fsr.2007.19.5.326
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
44
Attention FAMM Members: Proposed crack amendment is no guarantee of going home early.
- Published in:
- Federal Sentencing Reporter (University of California Press), 2007, v. 19, n. 5, p. 320
- Publication type:
- Article
45
Sentencing Discretion at Gunpoint: How to Think about Convictions Underlying § 924(c) Mandatory Minimums.
- Published in:
- 2010
- By:
- Publication type:
- Opinion
46
A CRACKED REMEDY: THE ANTI-DRUG ABUSE ACT OF 1986 AND RETROACTIVE APPLICATION OF THE FAIR SENTENCING ACT OF 2010.
- Published in:
- Temple Law Review, 2015, v. 87, n. 3, p. 645
- Publication type:
- Article
47
AS THOUGH THEY ARE CHILDREN: REPLACING MANDATORY MINIMUMS WITH INDIVIDUALIZED SENTENCING DETERMINATIONS FOR JUVENILES IN PENNSYLVANIA CRIMINAL COURT AFTER MILLER V. ALABAMA.
- Published in:
- Temple Law Review, 2013, v. 86, n. 1, p. 215
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
48
Life-With-Hope Sentencing.
- Published in:
- Ohio State Law Journal, 2015, v. 76, n. 5, p. 1051
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
49
Introduction.
- Published in:
- Queen's Law Journal, 2019, v. 44, n. 2, p. i
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
50
United States v. Sanchez: Is Section 3582 Resentencing Available to Defendants Who Entered Into Binding Plea Agreements Under the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure?
- Published in:
- American Journal of Trial Advocacy, 2009, v. 33, n. 1, p. 221
- Publication type:
- Article