Works matching DE "JUDICIAL supremacy"
1
- Journal of Law, Economics & Organization, 2014, v. 30, n. 3, p. 587, doi. 10.1093/jleo/ewt008
- Ginsburg, Tom;
- Versteeg, Mila
- Article
3
- Juridical Current, 2011, v. 14, n. 4, p. 91
- Article
4
- Juridical Current, 2009, v. 12, n. 1, p. 89
- Article
5
- South Dakota Law Review, 2018, v. 63, n. 2, p. 287
- Article
6
- William & Mary Law Review, 2017, v. 58, n. 5, p. 1713
- Article
7
- William & Mary Law Review, 2017, v. 58, n. 5, p. 1609
- Article
8
- William & Mary Law Review, 2017, v. 58, n. 5, p. 1549
- Article
9
- William & Mary Law Review, 2017, v. 58, n. 5, p. 1495
- Article
10
- William & Mary Law Review, 2017, v. 58, n. 5, p. 1459
- Article
11
- William & Mary Law Review, 2017, v. 58, n. 5, p. 1433
- Article
12
- William & Mary Law Review, 2016, v. 57, n. 5, p. 1825
- REDISH, MARTIN H.;
- HEINS, MATTHEW
- Article
13
- William & Mary Law Review, 2009, v. 50, n. 6, p. 2215
- Article
14
- Wisconsin Law Review, 2022, v. 2022, n. 5, p. 1235
- LITMAN, LEAH M.;
- SHAW, KATHERINE
- Article
15
- Presidential Studies Quarterly, 2023, v. 53, n. 2, p. 234, doi. 10.1111/psq.12831
- Brown, Rebecca L.;
- Epstein, Lee
- Article
16
- Law & Society Review, 2005, v. 39, n. 4, p. 793, doi. 10.1111/j.1540-5893.2005.00245.x
- Article
17
- Law & Society Review, 1996, v. 30, n. 1, p. 87, doi. 10.2307/3054035
- Knight, Jack;
- Epstein, Lee
- Article
18
- Denver Law Review, 2022, v. 99, n. 3, p. 591
- Article
19
- Fiat Iustitia, 2018, n. 1, p. 7
- Article
20
- Journal of Supreme Court History, 2023, v. 48, n. 2, p. 148, doi. 10.1353/sch.2023.a901537
- Article
21
- Journal of Supreme Court History, 2023, v. 48, n. 2, p. 137, doi. 10.1353/sch.2023.a901535
- Article
23
- Constitutional Commentary, 2006, v. 23, n. 1, p. 7
- Article
24
- California Law Review, 2007, v. 95, n. 5, p. 1313
- Article
25
- California Law Review, 2007, v. 95, n. 5, p. 1289
- Article
26
- Legal Thought / Pravna Misao, 2012, n. 5/6, p. 7
- Article
27
- Southwestern Law Review, 2011, v. 40, n. 4, p. 655
- Article
28
- Review of Constitutional Studies, 2012, v. 17, n. 2, p. 73
- Article
29
- Texas Review of Law & Politics, 2015, v. 20, n. 1, p. 1
- Article
30
- Washington University Global Studies Law Review, 2022, v. 21, n. 2, p. 211
- FUKUDA, KAZUO;
- LIFF, ADAM P.
- Article
31
- Osgoode Hall Law Journal, 2012, v. 50, n. 3, p. 527
- Article
32
- North Carolina Law Review, 2024, v. 102, n. 5, p. 1411
- Article
34
- Politicka Misao: Croatian Political Science Review, 2009, v. 46, n. 3, p. 174
- Article
35
- New York University Law Review, 2015, v. 90, n. 6, p. 1908
- Article
36
- Balcanica Posnaniensia. Acta et Studia, 2023, v. 30, n. 1, p. 73, doi. 10.14746/bp.2023.30.5
- Article
37
- California Western International Law Journal, 2021, v. 51, n. 2, p. 457
- Article
38
- American Journal of Comparative Law, 2016, v. 64, n. 2, p. 371, doi. 10.5131/AJCL.2016.0013
- Article
39
- American Journal of Comparative Law, 2015, v. 63, n. 2, p. 403, doi. 10.5131/AJCL.2015.0011
- Article
40
- Journal of African Law, 2011, v. 55, n. 1, p. 105, doi. 10.1017/S0021855311000052
- Article
41
- Dissent (0012-3846), 2020, v. 67, n. 1, p. 70, doi. 10.1353/dss.2020.0013
- Article
42
- Ratio Juris, 2016, v. 29, n. 1, p. 1, doi. 10.1111/raju.12107
- Article
43
- Ratio Juris, 2016, v. 29, n. 1, p. 83, doi. 10.1111/raju.12093
- Article
44
- Case Western Reserve Law Review, 2021, v. 72, n. 2, p. 273
- Article
45
- Case Western Reserve Law Review, 2014, v. 64, n. 4, p. 1119
- Article
46
- Case Western Reserve Law Review, 2014, v. 64, n. 3, p. 1119
- Article
47
- Parliamentarian, 2013, p. 62
- Article
48
- Cato Supreme Court Review, 2008, p. 161
- Article
49
- South Central Review, 2013, v. 30, n. 1, p. 97, doi. 10.1353/scr.2013.0008
- Article
50
- Publius: The Journal of Federalism, 2013, v. 43, n. 2, p. 251, doi. 10.1093/publius/pjs034
- Article