Works matching Clayton Antitrust Act
1
- 2015
- Gilbert, Richard J.;
- Greene, Hillary
- Essay
2
- Villanova Law Review, 2015, v. 60, n. 4, p. 703
- Article
3
- Ohio State Law Journal, 2015, v. 76, n. 3, p. 467
- Article
5
- California Management Review, 1960, v. 2, n. 4, p. 16, doi. 10.2307/41165401
- Article
6
- American Economic Review, 2017, v. 107, n. 7, p. 1938, doi. 10.1257/aer.20150143
- Frydman, Carola;
- Hilt, Eric
- Article
7
- Chicago-Kent Law Review, 2017, v. 92, n. 3, p. 1203
- Article
8
- Antitrust Law Journal, 2020, v. 83, n. 2, p. 509
- Article
9
- American Journal of Legal History, 2013, v. 53, n. 4, p. 441, doi. 10.1093/ajlh/53.4.441
- Article
10
- Ateneo Law Journal, 2011, v. 56, n. 2, p. 300
- Article
11
- University of Toledo Law Review, 2017, v. 48, n. 2, p. 337
- Article
12
- CounterPunch, 2021, p. 1
- Article
13
- DePaul Business & Commercial Law Journal, 2013, v. 12, n. 1, p. 121
- Article
14
- University of Pittsburgh Law Review, 2019, v. 81, n. 1, p. 189, doi. 10.5195/lawreview.2019.664
- Article
15
- William & Mary Policy Review, 2012, v. 4, n. 1, p. 77
- Huffman, Max;
- Heidtke, Daniel B.
- Article
16
- George Mason Law Review, 2017, v. 24, n. 5, p. 1117
- Tsai, Joanna;
- Yajing Jiang
- Article
17
- Duquesne Law Review, 2025, v. 63, n. 1, p. 1
- Musharbash, Basel J.;
- Hanley, Daniel A.
- Article
18
- Yale Law Journal, 2018, v. 127, n. 7, p. 2026
- MORTON, FIONA SCOTT;
- HOVENKAMP, HERBERT
- Article
19
- University of Chicago Law Review, 2024, v. 91, n. 8, p. 2407
- Article
20
- Review of Political Economy, 2013, v. 25, n. 1, p. 139, doi. 10.1080/09538259.2013.737129
- Article
21
- Health Matrix: Journal of Law-Medicine, 2021, v. 31, p. 133
- Article
22
- Southwestern Law Review, 2025, v. 53, n. 3, p. 470
- Article
23
- Emory Law Journal, 2022, v. 71, n. 5, p. 1035
- Article
24
- Missouri Law Review, 2013, v. 78, n. 1, p. 299
- Article
25
- Cardozo Law Review, 2020, v. 41, n. 3, p. 1141
- Article
26
- Cardozo Law Review, 2019, v. 40, n. 3, p. 1237
- Steil, Justin P.;
- Traficonte, Dan
- Article
27
- Southern California Law Review, 2012, v. 85, n. 3, p. 733
- Article
28
- Law & Contemporary Problems, 1972, v. 37, n. 2, p. 329, doi. 10.2307/1191156
- Article
29
- Law & Contemporary Problems, 1967, v. 32, n. 1, p. 15, doi. 10.2307/1190712
- Article
30
- Law & Contemporary Problems, 1965, v. 30, n. 3, p. 530, doi. 10.2307/1190821
- Article
32
- California Law Review, 2019, v. 107, n. 1, p. 309, doi. 10.15779/Z38TT4FT2H.
- Article
33
- Antitrust Bulletin, 2008, v. 53, n. 4, p. 1027, doi. 10.1177/0003603X0805300406
- Article
34
- Essays in Economic & Business History, 2004, v. 22, p. 111
- Article
35
- University of Miami Business Law Review, 2014, v. 22, n. 2, p. 117
- Article
36
- California Management Review, 1968, v. 10, n. 4, p. 55, doi. 10.2307/41164130
- Article
37
- American Business Law Journal, 2025, v. 62, n. 2, p. 95, doi. 10.1111/ablj.12258
- Ehrlich, Sam C.;
- Ternes, Neal C.
- Article
38
- Washington University Law Review, 2015, v. 92, n. 6, p. 1617
- Article
39
- Emory Bankruptcy Developments Journal, 2008, v. 25, n. 1, p. 147
- Article
40
- Harvard Political Review (Online), 2024, p. 1
- Article
41
- Indiana Law Journal, 2024, v. 99, n. 4, p. 1063
- Article
42
- Indiana Law Journal, 2019, v. 94, n. 3, p. 1030
- Marinescu, Ioana;
- Hovenkamp, Herbert J.
- Article
43
- Journal of Marketing, 1977, v. 41, n. 1, p. 88
- Article
44
- Journal of Marketing, 1967, v. 31, n. 4, p. 73
- Tarpey, LawrenceX.;
- Howard, Marshal C.
- Article
45
- Journal of Marketing, 1966, v. 30, n. 3, p. 74
- Article
46
- Journal of Marketing, 1959, v. 23, n. 4, p. 461
- Article
47
- Journal of Marketing, 1957, v. 22, n. 2, p. 214
- Article
48
- Journal of Marketing, 1957, v. 22, n. 1, p. 91
- Curran, Kenneth J.;
- Brown, William F.
- Article
49
- Journal of Marketing, 1954, v. 18, n. 3, p. 246, doi. 10.2307/1247315
- Barett, Edward W.;
- Boyd Jr, Harper W.;
- Forbush, Dascomb R.;
- Westfall, Ralph
- Article
50
- Journal of Marketing, 1953, v. 18, n. 1, p. 93
- Article