Works matching Stare decisis
1
- Lex Humana, 2012, v. 4, n. 1, p. 1, doi. 10.14195/2175-0947_4-1_1
- de Carvalho, Alexandre Douglas Zaidan
- Article
2
- International Journal of Legal Information, 2019, v. 47, n. 2, p. 90, doi. 10.1017/jli.2019.21
- Article
3
- Dalhousie Journal of Legal Studies, 2020, v. 29, p. 97
- Article
5
- Albany Law Review, 2014, v. 77, n. 4, p. 1347
- Article
6
- William & Mary Law Review, 2002, v. 44, n. 1, p. 405
- Article
7
- Columbia Human Rights Law Review, 2022, v. 53, n. 3, p. 721
- Cepeda Derieux, Adriel I.;
- Cox Alomar, Rafael
- Article
8
- Brigham Young University Law Review, 1994, v. 1994, n. 3, p. 633
- Article
10
- Cardozo Law Review, 2016, v. 38, n. 2, p. 797
- Article
12
- Alberta Law Review, 2015, v. 53, n. 1, p. 207
- Article
13
- Alabama Law Review, 2017, v. 69, n. 1, p. 1
- Article
14
- Chicago Journal of International Law, 2021, v. 22, n. 2, p. 493
- Article
15
- Michigan Law Review, 2011, v. 110, n. 1, p. 1
- Article
16
- Berkeley Journal of Employment & Labor Law, 2007, v. 28, n. 1, p. 217
- Article
17
- New York University Law Review, 2017, v. 92, n. 6, p. 2094
- Article
18
- Harvard Journal of Law & Public Policy, 2021, v. 44, n. 2, p. 403
- Article
19
- Harvard Journal of Law & Public Policy, 2020, v. 43, n. 3, p. 733
- Article
20
- California Law Review, 2015, v. 103, n. 5, p. 1139
- Article
22
- Journal of International Criminal Justice, 2012, v. 10, n. 3, p. 635, doi. 10.1093/jicj/mqs022
- Article
23
- Fordham Urban Law Journal, 2023, v. 51, n. 2, p. 547
- Article
24
- Law & Philosophy, 2024, v. 43, n. 1, p. 1, doi. 10.1007/s10982-023-09476-y
- Article
25
- Case Western Reserve Law Review, 2019, v. 70, n. 2, p. 283
- Linton, Paul Benjamin;
- Quinlan, Maura K.
- Article
26
- Case Western Reserve Law Review, 2019, v. 70, n. 2, p. 283
- Linton, Paul Benjamin;
- Quinlant, Maura K.
- Article
27
- Loyola of Los Angeles Law Review, 2023, v. 56, n. 3, p. 727
- Anenson, T. Leigh;
- Gershberg, Jennifer K.
- Article
28
- Washington & Lee Law Review, 2010, v. 67, n. 2, p. 411
- Article
29
- New York University Law Review, 2023, v. 98, n. 5, p. 1754
- ULLENDORFF, JONAH CHARLES
- Article
30
- Michigan Law Review, 2012, v. 111, n. 1, p. 1
- Article
31
- Duke Law Journal, 2024, v. 73, n. 7, p. 1501
- Article
32
- Duke Law Journal, 2012, v. 61, n. 5, p. 941
- Article
33
- Constitutional Commentary, 2005, v. 22, n. 2, p. 271
- Article
34
- Texas Review of Law & Politics, 2004, v. 8, n. 2, p. 271
- Article
35
- Texas Law Review, 2019, v. 97, n. 6, p. 1125
- Article
36
- William & Mary Law Review, 2020, v. 62, n. 1, p. 83
- Article
37
- American Journal of Law & Medicine, 1989, v. 15, n. 2/3, p. 204, doi. 10.1017/s0098858800012181
- Blaustein, Albert P.;
- Grant, Edward R.;
- Lohr, Ann-Louise;
- Todd, Kevin J.
- Article
38
- DePaul Business & Commercial Law Journal, 2013, v. 12, n. 1, p. 1
- Article
39
- Journal Jurisprudence, 2011, v. 10, p. 327
- Article
40
- University of Illinois Law Review, 2011, v. 2011, n. 2, p. 695
- Article
41
- Georgia Law Review, 2018, v. 52, n. 2, p. 685
- Article
42
- Arizona State Law Journal, 2018, v. 50, n. 4, p. 1215
- Article
43
- Perspectives on Political Science, 2004, v. 33, n. 3, p. 150, doi. 10.3200/PPSC.33.3.150-154
- Article
44
- Emory Law Journal, 2009, v. 58, n. 4, p. 831
- Article
45
- 2015
- BOEGLIN, JACK;
- TARANTO, JULIUS
- Opinion
46
- Yale Law Journal, 2015, v. 124, n. 5, p. 1825
- Article
47
- Dalhousie Journal of Legal Studies, 2013, v. 22, p. 34
- Article
48
- Alberta Law Review, 2018, v. 56, n. 1, p. 119, doi. 10.29173/alr2499
- Article
49
- Revista Digital de Derecho Administrativo, 2015, n. 14, p. 173, doi. 10.18601/21452946.n14.09
- Article
50
- Feminist Legal Studies, 2023, v. 31, n. 3, p. 391, doi. 10.1007/s10691-022-09505-6
- Article