SENTENCING COMMISSIONS AS PROVOCATEURS OF PROSECUTORIAL SELF-REGULATION.
- Published in:
- Columbia Law Review, 2005, v. 105, n. 4, p. 1010
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
Works matching IS 00101958 AND DT 2005 AND VI 105 AND IP 4
Results: 15
1
2
SENTENCING DECISIONS: MATCHING THE DECISIONMAKER TO THE DECISION NATURE.
- Published in:
- Columbia Law Review, 2005, v. 105, n. 4, p. 1124
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
3
THE UNEXAMINED DEATH PENALTY: CAPITAL PUNISHMENT AND REFORM OF THE MODEL PENAL CODE.
- Published in:
- Columbia Law Review, 2005, v. 105, n. 4, p. 1396
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
4
OBSOLESCENCE AND IMMANENCE IN PENAL THEORY AND POLICY.
- Published in:
- Columbia Law Review, 2005, v. 105, n. 4, p. 1233
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
5
THE NEW SENTENCING CONUNDRUM: POLICY AND CONSTITUTIONAL LAW AT CROSS-PURPOSES.
- Published in:
- Columbia Law Review, 2005, v. 105, n. 4, p. 1082
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
6
LESSONS OF A SENTENCING REFORMER FROM THE DEEP SOUTH.
- Published in:
- Columbia Law Review, 2005, v. 105, n. 4, p. 943
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
7
A MAP OF SENTENCING AND A COMPASS FOR JUDGES: SENTENCING INFORMATION SYSTEMS, TRANSPARENCY, AND THE NEXT GENERATION OF REFORM.
- Published in:
- Columbia Law Review, 2005, v. 105, n. 4, p. 1351
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
8
SENTENCING: LEARNING FROM, AND WORRYING ABOUT, THE STATES.
- Published in:
- Columbia Law Review, 2005, v. 105, n. 4, p. 933
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
9
PANEL ONE: PROSECUTORIAL DISCRETION AND ITS CHALLENGES.
- Published in:
- Columbia Law Review, 2005, v. 105, n. 4, p. 959
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
10
THE NEW SENTENCING CONUNDRUM: POLICY AND CONSTITUTIONAL LAW AT CROSS-PURPOSES.
- Published in:
- Columbia Law Review, 2005, v. 105, n. 4, p. 1082
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
11
PANEL TWO: CONSIDERATIONS AT SENTENCING--WHAT FACTORS ARE RELEVANT AND WHO SHOULD DECIDE?
- Published in:
- Columbia Law Review, 2005, v. 105, n. 4, p. 1048
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
12
STATE SENTENCING GUIDELINES: DIVERSITY, CONSENSUS, AND UNRESOLVED POLICY ISSUES.
- Published in:
- Columbia Law Review, 2005, v. 105, n. 4, p. 1190
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
13
PANEL THREE: THEORIES AND POLICIES UNDERLYING GUIDELINES SYSTEMS.
- Published in:
- 2005
- By:
- Publication type:
- Essay
14
THE FAILURE OF THE FEDERAL SENTENCING GUIDELINES: A STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS.
- Published in:
- Columbia Law Review, 2005, v. 105, n. 4, p. 1315
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
15
PANEL FOUR: THE INSTITUTIONAL CONCERNS INHERENT IN SENTENCING REGIMES.
- Published in:
- Columbia Law Review, 2005, v. 105, n. 4, p. 1276
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article