Works matching Frankfurter, Felix, 1882-1965
2
- Journal of Supreme Court History, 2003, v. 28, n. 3, p. 109, doi. 10.1111/1540-5818.00071
- Article
3
- Michigan Law Review, 2004, v. 102, n. 8, p. 1747, doi. 10.2307/4141965
- Article
4
- Review of Law & Social Change, 2011, v. 35, n. 3, p. 602
- Article
5
- New York Law School Law Review, 2006, v. 51, n. 1, p. 161
- Article
6
- Journalism History, 2009, v. 34, n. 4, p. 216, doi. 10.1080/00947679.2009.12062775
- Article
8
- Journal of Supreme Court History, 2018, v. 43, n. 2, p. 107, doi. 10.1353/sch.2018.0011
- Article
9
- Journal of Supreme Court History, 2017, v. 42, n. 1, p. 67, doi. 10.1353/sch.2017.0023
- Article
10
- Journal of Supreme Court History, 2014, v. 39, n. 1, p. 79, doi. 10.1353/sch.2014.0025
- Article
11
- Journal of Supreme Court History, 2012, v. 37, n. 3, p. 305, doi. 10.1353/sch.2012.0004
- Article
12
- Journal of Supreme Court History, 2010, v. 35, n. 2, p. 177, doi. 10.1111/j.1540-5818.2010.01240.x
- STEPHENSON, JR., DONALD GRIER
- Article
15
- Journal of Supreme Court History, 2006, v. 31, n. 3, p. 279, doi. 10.1353/sch.2006.0004
- Article
16
- Journal of Supreme Court History, 2004, v. 29, n. 2, p. 177, doi. 10.1111/j.1059-4329.2004.00080.x
- Article
17
- Journal of Supreme Court History, 2004, v. 29, n. 2, p. 207, doi. 10.1111/j.1059-4329.2004.00082.x
- Article
18
- Journal of Supreme Court History, 2003, v. 28, n. 2, p. 165, doi. 10.1111/1540-5818.00062
- Article
19
- Communication Law & Policy, 2015, v. 20, n. 1, p. 35, doi. 10.1080/10811680.2015.986413
- Article
20
- American Journal of Legal History, 2018, v. 58, n. 1, p. 4, doi. 10.1093/ajlh/njx038
- Article
21
- American Bar Association Journal, 1983, v. 69, n. 2, p. 151
- Article
22
- Polish Review, 2020, v. 65, n. 3, p. 30, doi. 10.5406/polishreview.65.3.0030
- Article
23
- U.C. Davis Law Review, 2013, v. 47, n. 1, p. 343
- Article
25
- Marquette Law Review, 2012, v. 96, n. 1, p. 133
- Article
26
- California Law Review, 1962, v. 50, n. 4, p. 591
- Article
31
- Journal of the Legal Profession, 2012, v. 36, n. 2, p. 441
- Article
32
- Journal of the Legal Profession, 2008, v. 33, p. 85
- Article
33
- Studies in American Political Development, 2009, v. 23, n. 2, p. 171, doi. 10.1017/S0898588X09990058
- Article
35
- Religion & Education, 2016, v. 43, n. 2, p. 142, doi. 10.1080/15507394.2016.1149381
- Article
38
- Touro Law Review, 2024, v. 39, n. 3, p. 871
- Article
39
- Touro Law Review, 2024, v. 39, n. 3, p. 805
- Article
41
- Touro Law Review, 2024, v. 39, n. 3, p. 795
- Article
42
- Touro Law Review, 2024, v. 39, n. 3, p. 823
- Article
44
- Touro Law Review, 2024, v. 39, n. 3, p. 777
- Article
45
- Touro Law Review, 2024, v. 39, n. 3, p. 835
- Article
46
- Touro Law Review, 2015, v. 31, n. 1, p. 133
- Article
47
- Law & Contemporary Problems, 1990, v. 53, n. 3, p. 79, doi. 10.2307/1191794
- Article
48
- Columbia Law Review, 2014, v. 114, n. 5, p. 1083
- Article
49
- St. Thomas Law Review, 2015, v. 27, n. 1, p. 1
- Article
50
- Boston College Law Review, 2012, v. 53, n. 2, p. 631
- Snyder, Brad;
- Barrett, John Q.
- Article