The death penalty and victim impact evidence: Payne v. Tennessee, 111 S. Ct. 2597 (1991).
- Published in:
- Harvard Journal of Law & Public Policy, 1992, v. 15, n. 1, p. 275
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
Works matching Payne v. Tennessee
Results: 19
1
2
Refined Raw: The Symbolic Violence of Victims' Rights Reforms.
- Published in:
- College Literature, 1999, v. 26, n. 1, p. 150
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
3
THURGOOD MARSHALL: THE WRITER.
- Published in:
- Willamette Law Review, 2011, v. 47, n. 2, p. 211
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
4
"AN EXISTENTIAL MOMENT OF MORAL PERCEPTION"1: DECLARATIONS OF LIFE AND THE CAPITAL JURY RE- IMAGINED.
- Published in:
- Quinnipiac Law Review, 2013, v. 31, n. 2, p. 303
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
5
THE ELUSIVE RIGHT TO CROSS-EXAMINE INDIVIDUALS PRESENTING VICTIM IMPACT STATEMENTS IN ARIZONA CAPITAL SENTENCING PROCEEDINGS.
- Published in:
- Arizona State Law Journal, 2011, v. 43, n. 1, p. 563
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
6
Payne v Tennessee: The Supreme Court places its stamp of...
- Published in:
- Brigham Young University Law Review, 1992, v. 1992, n. 3, p. 841
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
7
Victim Impact Evidence in Federal Capital Trials.
- Published in:
- Federal Sentencing Reporter (University of California Press), 2006, v. 19, n. 1, p. 5, doi. 10.1525/fsr.2006.19.1.05
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
8
THE ELUSIVE RIGHT TO CROSS-EXAMINE INDIVIDUALS PRESENTING VICTIM IMPACT STATEMENTS IN ARIZONA CAPITAL SENTENCING PROCEEDINGS.
- Published in:
- Arizona State Law Journal, 2011, v. 43, n. 2, p. 563
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
9
Justice Thurgood Marshall's Last Stand.
- Published in:
- Journal of Supreme Court History, 2022, v. 47, n. 2, p. 197, doi. 10.1353/sch.2022.0025
- Publication type:
- Article
10
VICTIM OPINION STATEMENTS: PROVIDING JUSTICE FOR GRIEVING FAMILIES.
- Published in:
- Journal of Law & Family Studies, 2010, v. 12, n. 2, p. 511
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
11
Victim Impact Statements: How Victim Social Class Affects Juror Decision Making.
- Published in:
- Violence & Victims, 2017, v. 32, n. 3, p. 521, doi. 10.1891/0886-6708.VV-D-15-00187
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
12
Who is the victim anyway? The effects of bystander victim impact statements on mock juror sentencing decisions.
- Published in:
- 2004
- By:
- Publication type:
- journal article
13
Moral Judgments and Emotional Pain.
- Published in:
- Psychiatric Times, 2010, v. 27, n. 10, p. 14
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
14
Victim impact statements and crime heinousness: a test of the saturation hypothesis.
- Published in:
- Psychology, Crime & Law, 2013, v. 19, n. 2, p. 129, doi. 10.1080/1068316X.2011.614244
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
15
The Changing Role of Victim Impact Evidence in Capital Cases.
- Published in:
- Western Criminology Review, 1999, v. 2, n. 1, p. 1
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
16
The Effects of Victim Impact Evidence on the Verdicts and Sentencing Judgments of Mock Jurors.
- Published in:
- Journal of Offender Rehabilitation, 1999, v. 29, n. 3/4, p. 95, doi. 10.1300/J076v29n03_05
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
17
VICTIM IMPACT EVIDENCE IN DEATH PENALTY SENTENCING PROCEEDINGS: ADVOCATING FOR A HIGHER RELEVANCY STANDARD.
- Published in:
- George Mason University Civil Rights Law Journal, 2011, v. 22, n. 1, p. 89
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
18
Victim Impact Testimony and Juror Judgements: The Effects of Harm Information and Witness Demeanor.
- Published in:
- Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 2002, v. 32, n. 11, p. 2393, doi. 10.1111/j.1559-1816.2002.tb01869.x
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
19
DISAGREEMENT AS DEPARTMENTALISM OR JUDICIAL SUPREMACY IN STARE DECISIS.
- Published in:
- New York University Law Review, 2023, v. 98, n. 5, p. 1754
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article