Works matching Antitrust law
1
- Journal of Antitrust Enforcement, 2023, v. 11, n. 2, p. 197, doi. 10.1093/jaenfo/jnad018
- Article
2
- Sociological Forum, 2020, v. 35, n. 4, p. 1250, doi. 10.1111/socf.12646
- Article
3
- Journal of Antitrust Enforcement, 2023, v. 11, n. 2, p. 230, doi. 10.1093/jaenfo/jnad021
- Article
4
- Journal of Antitrust Enforcement, 2023, v. 11, n. 2, p. 179, doi. 10.1093/jaenfo/jnad015
- Article
5
- Yearbook of Antitrust & Regulatory Studies, 2021, v. 14, n. 23, p. 39, doi. 10.7172/1689-9024.YARS.2021.14.23.2
- Article
6
- Themis: Revista de Derecho, 2020, n. 78, p. 167, doi. 10.18800/themis.202002.008
- Robles Vargas, Antonio;
- Gutiérrez Tercero, Cesar;
- Laurent del Castillo, Jacqueline St.
- Article
7
- Journal of Supply Chain Management, 2019, v. 55, n. 2, p. 47, doi. 10.1111/jscm.12196
- Gundlach, Gregory T.;
- Frankel, Robert;
- Krotz, Riley T.
- Article
8
- Journal of Eastern Liaoning University (Social Sciences), 2020, v. 22, n. 5, p. 47, doi. 10.14168/j.issn.1672-8572.2020.05.09
- Article
9
- Antitrust Bulletin, 2017, v. 62, n. 3, p. 514, doi. 10.1177/0003603X17719763
- Article
10
- European Journal of the History of Economic Thought, 2011, v. 18, n. 5, p. 777, doi. 10.1080/09672567.2011.616596
- Article
11
- Conservation Biology, 2004, v. 18, n. 6, p. 1475, doi. 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2004.00266.x
- THOMPSON, JONATHAN R.;
- ANDERSON, MARK D.;
- JOHNSON, K. NORMAN
- Article
12
- European Journal of Law & Economics, 2023, v. 55, n. 2, p. 349, doi. 10.1007/s10657-023-09763-y
- Cho, Sang Jun;
- Chung, Chune Young;
- Kim, Daniel Sungyeon
- Article
13
- Anales de Derecho, 2024, n. 41, p. 1, doi. 10.6018/analesderecho.558711
- RUIZ DE LA FUENTE, CONSUELO
- Article
14
- International Law, 2009, n. 14, p. 221
- GUTIÉRREZ-RODRÍGUEZ, JUAN DAVID
- Article
15
- Journal of Energy & Natural Resources Law, 1996, v. 14, n. 1, p. 76, doi. 10.1080/02646811.1996.11433050
- Article
16
- Journal of Optimization Theory & Applications, 2006, v. 128, n. 2, p. 431, doi. 10.1007/s10957-006-9024-9
- Motchenkova, E.;
- Kort, P. M.
- Article
17
- Perspectives of Law & Public Administration, 2019, v. 8, n. 1, p. 46
- (GHERMAN) IUHAS, Cristina
- Article
18
- Georgia Journal of International & Comparative Law, 2013, v. 41, n. 3, p. 831
- Article
19
- University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform, 2013, v. 47, n. 2, p. 529
- Article
20
- American Business Law Journal, 1972, v. 9, n. 3, p. 241, doi. 10.1111/j.1744-1714.1971.tb01567.x
- Article
21
- Law Review: Judicial Doctrine & Case-Law, 2012, p. 1
- Article
22
- Yale Law Journal, 2018, v. 127, n. 7, p. 2110
- MELAMED, A. DOUGLAS;
- SHAPIRO, CARL
- Article
23
- Creighton Law Review, 2004, v. 38, n. 1, p. 155
- Article
24
- University of Chicago Law Review, 2023, v. 90, n. 2, p. 659
- Article
25
- University of Chicago Law Review, 2023, v. 90, n. 2, p. 379
- Article
26
- University of Chicago Law Review, 2020, v. 87, n. 2, p. 413
- Article
27
- University of Miami Law Review, 2013, v. 67, n. 3, p. 737
- Article
28
- Journal of Industry, Competition & Trade, 2003, v. 3, n. 1/2, p. 27, doi. 10.1023/A:1025474302636
- Kun-Ming Chen;
- Hsiu-Hua Rau
- Article
29
- De Economist (0013-063X), 2003, v. 151, n. 4, p. 415, doi. 10.1023/B:ECOT.0000006592.62377.60
- Article
30
- Delaware Journal of Corporate Law, 2020, v. 44, n. 1, p. 121
- Article
31
- California Law Review, 2006, v. 94, n. 2, p. 371, doi. 10.2307/20439038
- Article
32
- California Law Review, 1987, v. 75, n. 3, p. 983, doi. 10.2307/3480662
- Article
33
- California Law Review, 1981, v. 69, n. 2, p. 497, doi. 10.2307/3480127
- Article
34
- California Law Review, 1958, v. 46, n. 3, p. 447, doi. 10.2307/3478379
- Article
35
- Washington University Global Studies Law Review, 2016, v. 15, n. 2, p. 381
- Article
36
- Cardozo Law Review, 2020, v. 41, n. 3, p. 1081
- Article
37
- Cardozo Law Review, 2015, v. 37, n. 2, p. 551
- Article
38
- American Bar Association Journal, 1975, v. 61, n. 5, p. 565
- Article
39
- Michigan Law Review, 2007, v. 106, n. 3, p. 545
- Article
40
- Michigan Law Review, 2002, v. 100, n. 7, p. 1867, doi. 10.2307/1556078
- Article
41
- Law & Policy, 2014, v. 36, n. 4, p. 408, doi. 10.1111/lapo.12025
- Article
42
- Law & Contemporary Problems, 1987, v. 50, n. 4, p. 217, doi. 10.2307/1191461
- Article
43
- Law & Contemporary Problems, 1987, v. 50, n. 3, p. 197, doi. 10.2307/1191671
- Article
44
- Law & Contemporary Problems, 1954, v. 19, n. 4, p. 648, doi. 10.2307/1190303
- FARAGHER, ROBERT V.;
- GEUNANN, FRITZ F.
- Article
45
- Law & Contemporary Problems, 1948, v. 13, n. 2, p. 278, doi. 10.2307/1189999
- Article
46
- Law & Contemporary Problems, 1947, v. 12, n. 3, p. 571, doi. 10.2307/1190044
- Article
47
- Challenge (05775132), 1993, v. 36, n. 1, p. 30, doi. 10.1080/05775132.1993.11471639
- Article
48
- Computer und Recht, 2019, v. 35, n. 6, p. 352, doi. 10.9785/cr-2019-350607
- Article
49
- California Law Review, 2022, v. 110, n. 6, p. 1717, doi. 10.15779/Z38GM81P9R
- Article
50
- Business Economics, 2005, v. 40, n. 2, p. 70, doi. 10.2145/20050208
- Article