Works matching Right to counsel and the Supreme Court
1
- Duquesne Law Review, 2013, v. 51, n. 3, p. 735
- Article
2
- Juridica International, 2015, v. 23, p. 124, doi. 10.12697/JI.2015.23.13
- Article
3
- Rutgers Law Journal, 2010, v. 41, n. 4, p. 1063
- Article
4
- Loyola Law Review, 2012, v. 58, n. 1, p. 275
- Article
5
- Psychology, Crime & Law, 2014, v. 20, n. 8, p. 741, doi. 10.1080/1068316X.2013.854795
- Patry, Marc W.;
- Smith, Steven M.;
- Adams, Nicole M.
- Article
6
- Juvenile & Family Law Digest, 2011, v. 43, n. 8, p. 13
- Article
7
- Juvenile & Family Law Digest, 2011, v. 43, n. 8, p. 2
- Article
8
- Juvenile & Family Law Digest, 2011, v. 43, n. 6, p. 21
- Article
9
- Texas Tech Law Review, 2012, v. 45, n. 1, p. 267
- Article
10
- Nevada Law Journal, 2017, v. 17, n. 2, p. 401
- Article
11
- Missouri Law Review, 2017, v. 82, n. 1, p. 133
- Article
12
- Iowa Law Review, 2014, v. 99, n. 5, p. 2219
- Article
13
- Iowa Law Review, 2014, v. 99, n. 5, p. 2131
- Article
14
- Oklahoma City University Law Review, 2013, v. 38, n. 1, p. 161
- Article
15
- Stanford Law Review, 2017, v. 69, n. 5, p. 1541
- Article
16
- Journal of Criminal Law, Criminology & Police Science, 1972, v. 63, n. 4, p. 473, doi. 10.2307/1141798
- Article
17
- Journal of Criminal Law, Criminology & Police Science, 1971, v. 62, n. 3, p. 363, doi. 10.2307/1142175
- Article
18
- Journal of Criminal Law, Criminology & Police Science, 1968, v. 59, n. 2, p. 270
- Article
19
- American Journal of Criminal Justice, 1985, v. 10, n. 1, p. 22, doi. 10.1007/BF02888874
- Article
20
- Cleveland State Law Review, 2017, v. 65, n. 2, p. 129
- Article
21
- Florida Bar Journal, 2003, v. 77, n. 3, p. 6
- Article
22
- Brigham Young University Law Review, 2010, v. 2010, n. 1, p. 321
- Article
23
- Southern California Interdisciplinary Law Journal, 2022, v. 31, n. 2, p. 245
- YACOUB, AMIN R.;
- BRIGGS, BECKY
- Article
24
- American University Journal of Gender, Social Policy & the Law, 2013, v. 21, n. 3, p. 681
- Article
25
- American University Journal of Gender, Social Policy & the Law, 2011, v. 20, n. 1, p. 273
- Article
26
- South Dakota Law Review, 2011, v. 56, n. 2, p. 238
- Article
27
- Boston College Journal of Law & Social Justice, 2012, v. 32, n. 1, p. 31
- Article
28
- University of Arkansas at Little Rock Law Review, 2015, v. 37, n. 4, p. 543
- Dickinson, Justice Jess H.
- Article
29
- Missouri Law Review, 2015, v. 80, n. 3, p. 771
- Article
30
- Texas Law Review, 2018, v. 96, n. 3, p. 653
- Article
32
- South Carolina Law Review, 2009, v. 60, n. 5, p. 1013
- Article
33
- Villanova Law Review, 2021, v. 66, n. 6, p. 53
- Article
34
- Cornell International Law Journal, 2009, v. 42, n. 3, p. 361
- Mills, John R.;
- Echemendia, Kristen M.;
- Yale-Loehr, Stephen
- Article
35
- Boston University Law Review, 2017, v. 97, n. 3, p. 1129
- Article
36
- Boston University Law Review, 2017, v. 97, n. 3, p. 993
- Article
37
- Boston University Law Review, 2017, v. 97, n. 3, p. 1293
- Article
38
- Boston University Law Review, 2014, v. 94, n. 5, p. 1651
- Article
39
- American Journal of Criminal Law, 2003, v. 30, n. 3, p. 363
- Article
40
- University of Toledo Law Review, 2024, v. 55, n. 2, p. 339
- Article
42
- American Bar Association Journal, 1981, v. 67, n. 8, p. 1036
- Article
43
- American Bar Association Journal, 1980, v. 66, n. 2, p. 138
- Article
44
- American Bar Association Journal, 1978, v. 64, n. 9, p. 1330
- Article
45
- American Bar Association Journal, 1978, v. 64, n. 2, p. 258
- Article
46
- Florida Bar Journal, 2015, v. 89, n. 6, p. 80
- Article
47
- Washington Law Review, 2017, v. 92, n. 1, p. 213
- Article
48
- Washington Law Review, 2014, v. 89, n. 1, p. 217
- Article
49
- Washington Law Review, 2011, v. 86, n. 4, p. 905
- Article
50
- Fordham Urban Law Journal, 2025, v. 52, n. 3, p. 697
- Buenaventura, Maya;
- Heaton, Paul
- Article