Works matching Judicial selection
1
- Political Research Quarterly, 2021, v. 74, n. 4, p. 1152, doi. 10.1177/1065912920971712
- Article
2
- Wisconsin Law Review, 2017, v. 2017, n. 2, p. 263
- GERHARDT, MICHAEL J.;
- PAINTER, RICHARD W.
- Article
3
- Judicature, 2016, v. 100, n. 1, p. 12
- Article
5
- Judicature, 2013, v. 96, n. 6, p. 296
- Article
6
- Judicature, 2010, v. 93, n. 6, p. 259
- Article
7
- McGeorge Law Review, 2011, v. 42, n. 1, p. 85
- Article
8
- Florida Bar Journal, 2005, v. 79, n. 1, p. 16
- Article
9
- Albany Law Review, 2009, v. 72, n. 3, p. 633
- Article
10
- Albany Law Review, 2006, v. 69, n. 4, p. 985
- Article
11
- Missouri Law Review, 2023, v. 88, n. 1, p. 107
- Article
12
- Arkansas Law Review (1968-present), 2011, v. 64, n. 1, p. 221
- Article
13
- Gender Issues, 2016, v. 53, n. 4, p. 829
- Article
14
- Brigham Young University Law Review, 1993, v. 1993, n. 4, p. 1257
- Article
15
- Judges' Journal, 2021, v. 60, n. 4, p. 32
- Article
16
- Brief, 2008, v. 37, n. 2, p. 24
- Article
17
- Texas Review of Law & Politics, 2019, v. 24, n. 2, p. 307
- Article
18
- Texas Review of Law & Politics, 2019, v. 24, n. 2, p. 299
- Article
19
- Harvard Journal of Law & Public Policy, 2009, v. 32, n. 3, p. 1035
- Article
20
- University of Chicago Law Review, 2022, v. 89, n. 1, p. 253
- Article
21
- Iowa Law Review, 2015, v. 100, n. 2, p. 551
- Gerhardt, Michael J.;
- Stein, Michael Ashley
- Article
22
- Bench & Bar of Minnesota, 2014, v. 71, n. 10, p. 4
- Article
24
- Bench & Bar of Minnesota, 2013, v. 70, n. 4, p. 16
- Article
25
- Judicature, 2013, v. 97, n. 1, p. 48
- BINDER, SARAH;
- MALTZMAN, FORREST
- Article
26
- Judicature, 2013, v. 96, n. 4, p. 178
- WHEAT, ELIZABETH;
- HURWITZ, MARK S.
- Article
27
- Judicature, 2011, v. 95, n. 1, p. 45
- Anderson, Paul H.;
- Anderson, G. Barry
- Article
29
- Judicature, 2010, v. 93, n. 5, p. 184
- Merola, Linda M.;
- Gould, Jon B.
- Article
30
- McGeorge Law Review, 2011, v. 42, n. 1, p. 47
- Article
31
- Missouri Law Review, 2009, v. 74, n. 3, p. 531
- Solimine, Michael E.;
- Gely, Rafael
- Article
32
- American Journal of Comparative Law, 2014, v. 62, n. 4, p. 893, doi. 10.5131/AJCL.2014.0027
- Article
33
- University of Pittsburgh Law Review, 2019, v. 80, n. 3, p. 775, doi. 10.5195/lawreview.2019.636
- Article
34
- CATO Journal, 2007, v. 27, n. 1, p. 69
- Sobel, Russell S.;
- Hall, Joshua C.
- Article
35
- European Constitutional Law Review, 2021, v. 17, n. 2, p. 287, doi. 10.1017/S1574019621000110
- Garoupa, Nuno;
- Gili, Marian;
- Gómez Pomar, Fernando
- Article
36
- Alaska Law Review, 2018, v. 35, n. 2, p. 205
- CARPENETI, WALTER L.;
- FRAZER, BRETT
- Article
38
- University of Louisville Law Review, 2013, v. 52, n. 2, p. 379
- Article
39
- San Diego Law Review, 2016, v. 53, n. 4, p. 829
- Article
42
- William & Mary Law Review, 2014, v. 56, n. 1, p. 1
- REDISH, MARTIN H.;
- ARONOFF, JENNIFER
- Article
43
- Edinburgh Law Review, 2018, v. 22, n. 1, p. 181, doi. 10.3366/elr.2018.0479
- Article
44
- Washington University Journal of Law & Policy, 2013, v. 44, p. 159
- Article
45
- Tennessee Bar Journal, 2013, v. 49, n. 12, p. 5
- Article
47
- Public Choice, 2004, v. 118, n. 3/4, p. 251, doi. 10.1023/B:PUCH.0000019906.11742.f8
- Stratmann, Thomas;
- Garner, Jared
- Article
48
- Arkansas Law Review (1968-present), 2015, v. 68, n. 4, p. 1061
- Article
49
- University of Arkansas at Little Rock Law Review, 2017, v. 39, n. 4, p. 521
- Article
50
- American Bar Association Journal, 1979, v. 65, n. 4, p. 516
- Article