Works matching DE "STANDARD of review (Law)"
1
- FinanzRundschau, 2022, v. 104, n. 8, p. 367, doi. 10.9785/fr-2022-1040810
- Article
2
- Brooklyn Law Review, 2014, v. 79, n. 4, p. 1703
- Article
3
- Maryland Law Review, 2012, v. 71, n. 3, p. 886
- Article
4
- Emory Law Journal, 2015, v. 64, p. 1529
- Article
5
- Emory Law Journal, 2014, v. 64, n. 1, p. 201
- Article
6
- Emory Law Journal, 2013, v. 63, n. 2, p. 455
- Article
7
- Oxford University Commonwealth Law Journal, 2019, v. 19, n. 1, p. 139, doi. 10.1080/14729342.2019.1573610
- Article
8
- Yale Journal on Regulation, 2016, v. 33, n. 1, p. 1
- Article
9
- Missouri Law Review, 2022, v. 87, n. 2, p. 1
- Article
10
- Dalhousie Law Journal, 2019, v. 42, n. 1, p. 49
- Heckman, Gerald;
- Khoday, Amar
- Article
11
- Judicial Review, 2014, v. 19, n. 1, p. 30, doi. 10.1080/10854681.2014.11426816
- Lidbetter, Andrew;
- Depani, Nehal
- Article
12
- Rutgers Computer & Technology Law Journal, 2012, v. 38, n. 1, p. 1
- Article
13
- St. Mary's Law Journal, 2021, v. 52, n. 4, p. 973
- Article
14
- Mercer Law Review, 2012, v. 63, n. 4, p. 1149
- Article
15
- Alberta Law Review, 2015, v. 52, n. 4, p. 799
- Article
16
- Southern California Law Review, 2014, v. 87, n. 3, p. 805
- Article
17
- Creighton Law Review, 2021, v. 54, n. 4, p. 605
- Article
18
- Creighton Law Review, 2015, v. 48, n. 3, p. 521
- Article
19
- Creighton Law Review, 2015, v. 48, n. 2, p. 345
- Article
20
- Journal of Health Care Law & Policy, 2013, v. 16, n. 2, p. 403
- Article
21
- Journal of International Economic Law, 2013, v. 16, n. 3, p. 613, doi. 10.1093/jiel/jgt022
- Vadi, Valentina;
- Gruszczynski, Lukasz
- Article
22
- Administrative Law Review, 2014, v. 66, n. 2, p. 253
- Article
23
- European Constitutional Law Review, 2016, v. 12, n. 2, p. 265, doi. 10.1017/S1574019616000158
- Article
24
- University of Toledo Law Review, 2016, v. 47, n. 2, p. 349
- Article
25
- Valparaiso University Law Review, 2015, v. 49, n. 2, p. 533
- Kennedy, Liz;
- Endo, Seth Katsuya
- Article
26
- Southern Illinois University Law Journal, 2018, v. 43, n. 1, p. 91
- Article
27
- New York University Law Review, 2018, v. 93, n. 2, p. 175
- Article
28
- Golden Gate University Law Review, 2022, v. 52, n. 1, p. 1
- Article
29
- Harvard Journal of Law & Public Policy, 2018, v. 41, n. 3, p. 973
- Article
30
- Journal of African Law, 2019, v. 63, n. 1, p. 127, doi. 10.1017/S002185531800027X
- Article
31
- Utah Bar Journal, 2015, v. 28, n. 2, p. 28
- Article
32
- Utah Bar Journal, 2012, v. 25, n. 6, p. 60
- Article
33
- Journal of the Missouri Bar, 2012, v. 68, n. 1, p. 32
- Article
34
- U.C. Davis Law Review, 2016, v. 50, n. 1, p. 87
- Article
35
- Touro Law Review, 2015, v. 31, n. 4, p. 723
- Article
36
- Ohio State Law Journal, 2021, v. 82, n. 4-6, p. 249
- Article
37
- Ohio State Law Journal, 2020, v. 81, n. 4-6, p. 723
- Article
38
- Ohio State Law Journal, 2020, v. 81, n. 4-6, p. 611
- HICKMAN, KRISTIN E.;
- HAHN, R. DAVID
- Article
39
- Stanford Law Review, 2021, v. 73, n. 6, p. 1551
- Article
40
- Boston College Law Review, 2022, v. 63, n. 5, p. 1603
- Article
41
- Boston College Law Review, 2015, v. 56, n. 5, p. 2019
- Article
42
- William Mitchell Law Review, 2014, v. 40, n. 4, p. 1443
- Article
43
- Queen's Law Journal, 2016, v. 41, n. 2, p. 355
- Article
44
- Pace Law Review, 2021, v. 42, n. 1, p. 24
- Article
45
- Pace Law Review, 2016, v. 36, n. 2, p. 477, doi. 10.58948/2331-3528.1922
- Article
46
- American University Law Review, 2014, v. 63, n. 6, p. 1749
- Article
47
- Vanderbilt Journal of Transnational Law, 2015, v. 48, n. 2, p. 307
- Article
48
- McGill Law Journal, 2016, v. 62, n. 2, p. 527, doi. 10.7202/1040054ar
- Article
49
- Dispute Resolution Journal, 2012, v. 67, n. 3, p. 91
- Article
50
- Dispute Resolution Journal, 2012, v. 67, n. 3, p. 10
- Article