THE PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION STANDARD: UNDERSTANDING THE PUBLIC INTEREST FACTOR.
- Published in:
- Michigan Law Review, 2019, v. 117, n. 5, p. 939, doi. 10.36644/mlr.117.5.preliminary
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
Works matching DE "PRELIMINARY injunctions"
Results: 182
1
2
THE DEMOCRACY RATCHET.
- Published in:
- Indiana Law Journal, 2019, v. 94, n. 2, p. 451
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
3
KEEPING THE STATUS QUO: WHY CONTINUING TO RECOGNIZE THE PRESUMPTION OF IRREPARABLE HARM IN FALSE COMPARATIVE ADVERTISING PROTECTS THE MARKET.
- Published in:
- Fordham Journal of Corporate & Financial Law, 2015, v. 20, n. 4, p. 933
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
4
The IRS's Procedural Battles in MicroCaptive Litigation.
- Published in:
- ABA Tax Times, 2022, v. 41, n. 1, p. 15
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
5
Pyramiding Employment Taxes and Government Remedies.
- Published in:
- ABA Tax Times, 2021, v. 40, n. 4, p. 23
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
6
DEFENDING SCIENCE & COLLABORATIVE CONSERVATION: SAGE-GROUSE & WESTERN WATERSHEDS PROJECT V. SCHNEIDER (D. IDAHO 2019).
- Published in:
- Harvard Environmental Law Review, 2020, v. 44, n. 2, p. 591
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
7
Acoustic radiation force impulse elastography in evaluation of triple-negative breast cancer: A preliminary experience.
- Published in:
- Clinical Hemorheology & Microcirculation, 2018, v. 70, n. 3, p. 301, doi. 10.3233/CH-170363
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
8
Signaling, Learning, and Screening Prior to Trial: Informational Implications of Preliminary Injunctions.
- Published in:
- Journal of Law, Economics & Organization, 2013, v. 29, n. 5, p. 1085, doi. 10.1093/jleo/ews015
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
9
CONSTITUTIONAL HARDBALL AND NATIONWIDE PRELIMINARY INJUNCTIONS.
- Published in:
- Duke Journal of Constitutional Law & Public Policy, 2023, v. 18, n. 1, p. 1
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
10
Can the English Patents Court award a cross-border preliminary injunction?
- Published in:
- Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice, 2022, v. 17, n. 4, p. 367, doi. 10.1093/jiplp/jpac018
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
11
Lies don't travel far: Article 3(c) of the SPC Regulation from a German perspective.
- Published in:
- Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice, 2019, v. 14, n. 12, p. 918, doi. 10.1093/jiplp/jpz137
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
12
Milan court grants suppliers of luxury cosmetics interim relief against infringers of selective distribution networks.
- Published in:
- Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice, 2019, v. 14, n. 6, p. 425, doi. 10.1093/jiplp/jpz049
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
13
Serving and enforcing a German preliminary injunction abroad.
- Published in:
- Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice, 2013, v. 8, n. 12, p. 911, doi. 10.1093/jiplp/jpt200
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
14
Liability of search engine operator for autocomplete suggestions that infringe rights of privacy - “Autocomplete” function.
- Published in:
- Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice, 2013, v. 8, n. 10, p. 797, doi. 10.1093/jiplp/jpt139
- Publication type:
- Article
15
Preliminary injunction proceedings in German intellectual property disputes.
- Published in:
- Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice, 2013, v. 8, n. 2, p. 136, doi. 10.1093/jiplp/jps208
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
16
Apple v Samsung: a preliminary injunction against the Galaxy Nexus smartphone.
- Published in:
- Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice, 2013, v. 8, n. 1, p. 6, doi. 10.1093/jiplp/jps174
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
17
Off the Wall: Remedying VARA's "Recognized Stature" Provision's Failure to Preserve Independent Public Art.
- Published in:
- Kansas Law Review, 2022, v. 71, n. 1, p. 133
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
18
PRELIMINARY INJUNCTIONS IN ENVIRONMENTAL LAWSUITS: THE NINTH CIRCUIT'S DISCRETIONARY APPROACH IN LEAGUE OF WILDERNESS DEFENDERS V CONNAUGHTON.
- Published in:
- Environmental Law (Lewis & Clark Law School), 2015, v. 45, n. 3, p. 793
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
19
THE CHRONIC EFFECT OF"KILL THE INDIAN SAVE THE MAN": AN ANALYSIS OF DREAMING BEAR V. FLEMING.
- Published in:
- South Dakota Law Review, 2021, v. 66, n. 2, p. 361
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
20
PURCELL PRINCIPLES FOR STATE COURTS.
- Published in:
- Wisconsin Law Review, 2024, v. 2024, n. 5, p. 1637, doi. 10.59015/wlr.WCKM8290
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
21
WITH FEDERAL MONEY UP FOR GRABS AND THE CLEAN ENERGY DREAM WITHIN REACH, THE NINTH CIRCUIT RUBBER STAMPS THE CENTRAL DISTRICT'S FLAWED JUDGMENT IN WESTERN WATERSHED PROJECT V. SALAZAR: SHOULD NEPA JURISPRUDENCE BE MODIFIED?
- Published in:
- Golden Gate University Law Review, 2014, v. 45, n. 1, p. 21
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
22
Defending the Masses: A Progressive Lawyer's Battles for Free Speech, by Eric B. Easton: Madison: The University of Wisconsin Press, 2018, xi 269 pp., preface, introduction, notes, table of cases, index, $79.95 cloth.
- Published in:
- 2019
- By:
- Publication type:
- Book Review
23
INTERNATIONAL LAW -- NINTH CIRCUIT ISSUES PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION RECOGNIZING ACTIVIST CONSERVATION SOCIETY AS PIRATES.
- Published in:
- Suffolk Transnational Law Review, 2013, v. 36, n. 2, p. 461
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
24
PAYING FOR PRETRIAL DETENTION.
- Published in:
- North Carolina Law Review, 2020, v. 98, n. 6, p. 1255
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
25
WHY THERE SHOULD BE A PRESUMPTION AGAINST NATIONWIDE PRELIMINARY INJUNCTIONS.
- Published in:
- North Carolina Law Review, 2017, v. 96, n. 1, p. 200
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
26
PRELIMINARY INJUNCTIONS IN PUBLIC LAW: THE MERITS.
- Published in:
- Houston Law Review, 2023, v. 60, n. 5, p. 1067
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
27
Protecting Your Injunction on Appeal in Trial Court.
- Published in:
- Florida Bar Journal, 2014, v. 88, n. 1, p. 28
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
28
SURVEY OF ADDITIONAL TOPICS IN IP LAW.
- Published in:
- Berkeley Technology Law Journal, 2019, v. 34, n. 4, p. 1337
- Publication type:
- Article
29
INTERNET TAX DEVELOPMENTS.
- Published in:
- Berkeley Technology Law Journal, 2011, v. 26, n. 1, p. 768
- Publication type:
- Article
30
NXIVM CoRp. v. Ross INSTITUTE 364 F.3d 471 (2d Cir. 2004).
- Published in:
- Berkeley Technology Law Journal, 2005, v. 20, n. 1, p. 735
- Publication type:
- Article
31
ELvIS PRESLEY ENTERPRISES, INC. V. PASSPORT VIDEO 349 F.3d 622 (9th Cir. 2003).
- Published in:
- Berkeley Technology Law Journal, 2005, v. 20, n. 1, p. 730
- Publication type:
- Article
32
REGISTER. COM, INC. V. VERiO, INC. 356 F.3d 393 (2d Cir. 2004).
- Published in:
- Berkeley Technology Law Journal, 2005, v. 20, n. 1, p. 337
- Publication type:
- Article
33
ADDITIONAL DEVELOPMENTS-TRADE SECRET D VD CoPY CONTROL Ass'N, INC. v. BUNNER 10 Cal Rptr. 3d 185 (C. App. 2004).
- Published in:
- Berkeley Technology Law Journal, 2005, v. 20, n. 1, p. 255
- Publication type:
- Article
34
ADDITIONAL DEVELOPMENTS-PATENT: BIOGENIDEC MA INC. v. TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY 2004 WL 1839726 (D. Mass. Aug. 13, 2004).
- Published in:
- Berkeley Technology Law Journal, 2005, v. 20, n. 1, p. 173
- Publication type:
- Article
35
OS EFEITOS DA CITAÇÃO NO PROCEDIMENTO CAUTELAR DE SUSPENSÃO DE DELIBERAÇÕES SOCIAIS: BREVE ANÁLISE CRÍTICA DO REGIME DO ARTIGO 397.⚬, N.⚬3 DO CÓDIGO DE PROCESSO CIVIL.
- Published in:
- Actualidad Jurídica (1578-956X), 2009, n. 24, p. 89
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
36
DOPUSZCZALNOŚĆ OGRANICZENIA PRAWA DO OBRONY W KODEKSOWYCH POSTĘPOWANIACH SZCZEGÓLNYCH.
- Published in:
- Annals of Juridica Sciences / Roczniki Nauk Prawnych, 2024, v. 34, n. 1, p. 7, doi. 10.18290/rnp24341.1
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
37
The Administrative Procedure Act's Stay Provision: Bypassing Scylla and Charybdis of Preliminary Injunctions.
- Published in:
- George Washington Law Review, 2017, v. 85, n. 5, p. 1529
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
38
Ten Years After Omnicare: The Evolving Market for Deal Protection Devices.
- Published in:
- Journal of Corporation Law, 2013, v. 38, n. 4, p. 891
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
39
Market entrance, patents, and preliminary injunctions: a model of pharmaceutical patent litigation.
- Published in:
- European Journal of Law & Economics, 2022, v. 53, n. 3, p. 379, doi. 10.1007/s10657-021-09721-6
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
40
Masthead.
- Published in:
- 2022
- Publication type:
- Table of Contents
41
USA: Preliminary Injunction on basis of Computer Fraud and Abuse Act.
- Published in:
- Computer Law Review International, 2022, v. 23, n. 3, p. 75, doi. 10.9785/cri-2022-230304
- Publication type:
- Article
42
Absent Vesting Language, Retiree Health Care Benefits Did Not Outlive CBA.
- Published in:
- Benefits Quarterly, 2019, v. 35, p. 55
- Publication type:
- Article
43
Contraception Coverage.
- Published in:
- Benefits Quarterly, 2015, v. 31, n. 3, p. 57
- Publication type:
- Article
44
Does Investor-State Dispute Settlement Discriminate Against Nationals?
- Published in:
- German Law Journal, 2020, v. 21, n. 2, p. 197, doi. 10.1017/glj.2020.10
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
45
NOW IS THE WINTER OF GINSBURG'S DISSENT: Unifying the Circuit Split as to Preliminary Injunctions and Establishing a Sliding Scale Test.
- Published in:
- Tennessee Journal of Law & Policy, 2018, v. 13, n. 1, p. 15
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
46
EAGLE VERSUS PHOENIX: A TALE OF FEDERALISM.
- Published in:
- South Carolina Journal of International Law & Business, 2010, v. 7, n. 1, p. 109
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
47
Looking Ahead: October Term 2024.
- Published in:
- Cato Supreme Court Review, 2023, p. 367
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
48
Hazy Shades of Winter: Resolving the Circuit Split over Preliminary Injunctions.
- Published in:
- Vanderbilt Law Review, 2012, v. 65, n. 3, p. 1011
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
49
Institute of Cetacean Research v. Sea Shepherd Conservation Society, 708 F.3d 1099 (9th Cir. 2013).
- Published in:
- Tulane Environmental Law Journal, 2013, v. 26, n. 2, p. 333
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
50
How Town of Chester v. Laroe Estates, Inc. Turned the One-Good-Plaintiff Rule into the One-Good-Remedy Rule.
- Published in:
- San Diego Law Review, 2017, v. 54, n. 4, p. 705
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article