Works matching DE "LEGAL status of defendants"
1
- Communications Law: Journal of Computer, Media & Telecommunications Law, 2014, v. 19, n. 4, p. 136
- Article
2
- Communications Law: Journal of Computer, Media & Telecommunications Law, 2014, v. 19, n. 4, p. 109
- Article
3
- Michigan Law Review, 2016, v. 115, n. 2, p. 277
- Article
4
- Michigan Law Review, 2014, v. 113, n. 2, p. 279
- Article
5
- European Journal of Law & Economics, 2016, v. 41, n. 1, p. 85, doi. 10.1007/s10657-015-9506-z
- Grajzl, Peter;
- Dimitrova-Grajzl, Valentina;
- Zajc, Katarina
- Article
6
- Federal Probation, 2018, v. 82, n. 2, p. 50
- Holsinger, Alexander M.;
- Lowenkamp, Christopher T.;
- Latessa, Edward J.;
- Serin, Ralph;
- Cohen, Thomas H.;
- Robinson, Charles R.;
- Flores, Anthony W.;
- VanBenschoten, Scott W.
- Article
7
- Federal Probation, 2018, v. 82, n. 2, p. 13
- Article
8
- Federal Probation, 2018, v. 82, n. 2, p. 3
- Article
9
- DePaul Journal for Social Justice, 2015, v. 8, n. 2, p. 199
- Article
10
- DePaul Journal for Social Justice, 2015, v. 8, n. 2, p. 287
- Article
11
- Texas Journal on Civil Liberties & Civil Rights, 2016, v. 22, n. 1, p. 73
- Article
12
- Texas Journal on Civil Liberties & Civil Rights, 2016, v. 21, n. 2, p. 219
- Article
13
- Emory Law Journal, 2017, v. 67, n. 1, p. 124
- Article
14
- Emory Law Journal, 2015, v. 64, n. 3, p. 819
- Article
15
- Emory Law Journal, 2014, v. 64, n. 2, p. 531
- Article
16
- New York Law School Law Review, 2016, v. 61, n. 3/4, p. 395
- Article
17
- Revista Canaria de Estudios Ingleses, 2017, v. 75, p. 139
- Article
19
- Denver Law Review, 2021, v. 98, n. 4, p. 867
- Article
20
- Denver Law Review, 2019, v. 96, n. 3, p. 699
- Article
21
- Applied Cognitive Psychology, 2015, v. 29, n. 2, p. 200, doi. 10.1002/acp.3094
- Nuñez, Narina;
- Schweitzer, Kimberly;
- Chai, Christopher A.;
- Myers, Bryan
- Article
22
- Southwestern Law Review, 2014, v. 43, n. 3, p. 431
- Article
23
- University of Western Australia Law Review, 2021, v. 48, n. 2, p. 431
- Article
25
- Vermont Law Review, 2008, v. 33, n. 2, p. 323
- Article
26
- Oklahoma City University Law Review, 2019, v. 44, n. 3, p. 387
- Article
27
- Florida Bar Journal, 2017, v. 91, n. 1, p. 42
- Article
28
- Legal Studies, 2021, v. 41, n. 1, p. 1, doi. 10.1017/lst.2020.44
- Article
29
- Wake Forest Law Review, 2017, v. 52, n. 1, p. 61
- Article
30
- Berkeley Technology Law Journal, 2016, v. 31, n. 1, p. 1, doi. 10.15779/Z38285T
- Article
31
- Cornell Law Review, 2018, v. 104, n. 1, p. 101
- Eldar, Ofer;
- Sukhatme, Neel U.
- Article
33
- New York University Law Review, 2014, v. 89, n. 5, p. 1902
- Article
34
- New York University Law Review, 2014, v. 89, n. 3, p. 1006
- Article
35
- Law, Probability & Risk, 2016, v. 15, n. 1, p. 71, doi. 10.1093/lpr/mgv016
- Article
36
- Urban Lawyer, 2015, v. 47, n. 3, p. 565
- Article
37
- Urban Lawyer, 2015, v. 47, n. 2, p. 383
- Article
38
- Case Western Reserve Law Review, 2016, v. 66, n. 3, p. 769
- Article
39
- Elder Law Journal, 2021, v. 29, n. 2, p. 249
- Article
40
- Vanderbilt Law Review, 2019, v. 72, n. 2, p. 561
- Article
41
- Vanderbilt Law Review, 2017, v. 70, n. 6, p. 1027
- Article
42
- Vanderbilt Law Review, 2016, v. 69, n. 3, p. 803
- Article
43
- Vanderbilt Law Review, 2015, v. 68, n. 4, p. 1055
- Article
44
- Vanderbilt Law Review, 2015, v. 68, n. 2, p. 501
- Article
45
- UMKC Law Review, 2015, v. 84, n. 2, p. 449
- Article
46
- Southern California Law Review, 2019, v. 92, n. 5, p. 1235
- Article
47
- Southern California Law Review, 2017, v. 90, n. 2, p. 237
- Article
48
- Journal of Passthrough Entities, 2014, v. 17, n. 3, p. 21
- Frost, Steven G.;
- Close, Jeff;
- Lombardo, Joe
- Article
49
- Youth Justice, 2019, v. 19, n. 1, p. 42, doi. 10.1177/1473225419833825
- Article