Works matching Reconstruction and the Supreme Court
1
- New York University Law Review, 2024, v. 99, n. 5, p. 1856
- Article
3
- Journal of Supreme Court History, 2016, v. 41, n. 3, p. 275, doi. 10.1353/sch.2016.0004
- Article
6
- Journal of Supreme Court History, 2004, v. 29, n. 3, p. 254, doi. 10.1111/j.1059-4329.2004.00085.x
- Article
7
- Rhetoric & Public Affairs, 2003, v. 6, n. 3, p. 487, doi. 10.1353/rap.2003.0058
- Article
8
- Journal of Southern Legal History, 2017, v. 25, p. 205
- Article
9
- University of Chicago Law Review, 2023, v. 90, n. 3, p. 813
- Article
10
- Columbia Law Review, 2012, v. 112, n. 7, p. 1585
- Article
11
- Lewis & Clark Law Review, 2023, v. 27, n. 3, p. 825
- Article
12
- Journal of Popular Culture (Wiley-Blackwell), 1994, v. 28, n. 3, p. 245, doi. 10.1111/j.0022-3840.1994.2803_245.x
- Article
16
- California Law Review, 1961, v. 49, n. 5, p. 988, doi. 10.2307/3479072
- Article
17
- Southern California Law Review, 2018, v. 91, n. 6, p. 1197
- Article
18
- William & Mary Law Review, 2021, v. 62, n. 5, p. 1615
- Article
19
- University of Chicago Law Review, 2023, v. 90, n. 8, p. 2101
- Hershkoff, Helen;
- Smith Jr., Fred
- Article
20
- Case Western Reserve Law Review, 2014, v. 64, n. 4, p. 755
- Article
21
- Cato Supreme Court Review, 2013, p. 261
- Article
22
- University of Cincinnati Law Review, 2024, v. 92, n. 4, p. 1001
- Article
23
- Yale Law Journal, 2022, v. 131, n. 7, p. 2020
- BOWIE, NIKOLAS;
- RENAN, DAPHNA
- Article
24
- Yale Law Journal, 2012, v. 121, n. 7, p. 1584
- Re, Richard M.;
- Re, Christopher M.
- Article
25
- Journal of College & University Law, 2011, v. 37, n. 3, p. 491
- Camilli, Gregory;
- Welner, Kevin G.
- Article
26
- Journal of Supreme Court History, 2016, v. 41, n. 3, p. 247, doi. 10.1353/sch.2016.0000
- Article
27
- Journal of Supreme Court History, 2016, v. 41, n. 3, p. 329, doi. 10.1353/sch.2016.0007
- Article
29
- Boston University Law Review, 2025, v. 105, n. 1, p. 163
- Article
30
- American Literary History, 2018, v. 30, n. 3, p. 608, doi. 10.1093/alh/ajy029
- Article
31
- Social Justice Research, 2008, v. 21, n. 1, p. 26, doi. 10.1007/s11211-007-0061-9
- Article
32
- Texas Law Review, 2016, v. 94, n. 7, p. 1555
- Article
33
- Texas Law Review, 2008, v. 86, n. 4, p. 667
- Article
34
- Utah Law Review, 2022, v. 2022, n. 3, p. 651
- Article
35
- Utah Law Review, 2021, v. 2021, n. 3, p. 569
- Article
36
- Journal of Law & Politics, 2009, v. 25, n. 2, p. 211
- Article
37
- University of Pennsylvania Journal of Constitutional Law, 2024, v. 26, n. 6, p. 1495, doi. 10.58112/jcl.26-6.3
- Article
38
- Washington & Lee Law Review, 2022, v. 79, n. 2, p. 533
- Article
39
- Social Science Journal, 2014, v. 51, n. 3, p. 398, doi. 10.1016/j.soscij.2014.05.006
- Curry, Brett;
- Davis, Trenton J.
- Article
40
- Historia Constitucional, 2024, n. 25, p. 1447, doi. 10.17811/hc.v0i25.1001
- Cajas Sarria, Mario Alberto
- Article
41
- Texas Hispanic Journal of Law & Policy, 2015, v. 21, p. 1
- Article
42
- Vanderbilt Law Review, 2020, v. 73, n. 3, p. 673
- Article
43
- Arkansas Law Review (1968-present), 2020, v. 73, n. 1, p. 111
- Article
44
- Gaceta Laboral, 2015, v. 21, n. 3, p. 239
- Aldao, Martín;
- Clérico, Laura;
- De Fazio, Federico
- Article
45
- Revista Jurídica (0103-3506), 2024, v. 80, n. 3, p. 581
- CESAR DE SÁ DA ROCHA, JULIO;
- LIMA DE MATOS, EDUARDO;
- CUNHA, ANALICE
- Article
46
- Texas Law Review, 2022, v. 100, n. 3, p. 467
- Article
48
- Boston College Law Review, 2016, v. 57, n. 4, p. 1287
- Article
49
- Emory Law Journal, 2019, v. 68, n. 3, p. 563
- Article
50
- University of Maryland Law Journal of Race, Religion, Gender & Class, 2020, v. 20, n. 2, p. 306
- Article