Works matching DE "MISAPPROPRIATION of trade secrets"
1
- Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice, 2022, v. 17, n. 9, p. 761, doi. 10.1093/jiplp/jpac075
- Lee, Jyh-An;
- Liu, Jingwen;
- Huang, Haifeng
- Article
2
- Wisconsin Law Review, 2024, v. 2024, n. 3, p. 1013, doi. 10.59015/wlr.BIEB5896
- Article
3
- Wisconsin Law Review, 2023, v. 2023, n. 6, p. 1929, doi. 10.59015/wlr.CHWP1162
- Article
4
- Law Library Journal, 2017, v. 109, n. 3, p. 363
- Article
5
- Houston Law Review, 2017, v. 55, n. 1, p. 155
- Article
6
- Wake Forest Law Review, 2018, v. 53, n. 1, p. 105
- Levine, David S.;
- Seaman, Christopher B.
- Article
7
- Berkeley Technology Law Journal, 2024, v. 39, n. 2, p. 721, doi. 10.15779/Z38000018N
- Article
8
- Berkeley Technology Law Journal, 2017, v. 32, n. 2, p. 829, doi. 10.15779/Z381G0HV10
- Sandeen, Sharon K.;
- Seaman, Christopher B.
- Article
9
- Berkeley Technology Law Journal, 2011, v. 26, n. 1, p. 915
- Article
10
- Grey Journal (TGJ), 2019, v. 15, n. 2, p. 77
- Lipinski, Tomas A.;
- Henderson, Kathrine A.
- Article
11
- Creighton Law Review, 2017, v. 50, n. 3, p. 559
- Article
12
- Academy of Management Journal, 2014, v. 57, n. 4, p. 1078, doi. 10.5465/amj.2012.0003
- HALLEN, BENJAMIN L.;
- KATILA, RIITTA;
- ROSENBERGER, JEFF D.
- Article
13
- Vanderbilt Law Review, 2018, v. 71, n. 3, p. 1033
- Article
14
- Delaware Journal of Corporate Law, 2022, v. 46, n. 3, p. 593
- Article
16
- Southern Law Journal, 2014, v. 24, n. 1, p. 67
- Article
17
- Pace Law Review, 2014, v. 35, n. 2, p. 455
- Article
18
- Loyola of Los Angeles Entertainment Law Review, 2012, v. 32, n. 3, p. 365
- Article
19
- Bench & Bar of Minnesota, 2017, v. 74, n. 10, p. 32
- Article
20
- Bench & Bar of Minnesota, 2017, v. 74, n. 8, p. 38
- ZEULI, TONY;
- HAMMOND, RACHEL
- Article
21
- Bench & Bar of Minnesota, 2015, v. 72, n. 8, p. 32
- Article
22
- Dreptul, 2012, n. 8, p. 84
- Article
23
- Virginia Sports & Entertainment Law Journal, 2012, v. 12, n. 1, p. 63
- Article
24
- Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 2016, v. 21, n. 4, p. 193
- Article
25
- University of Chicago Law Review, 2023, p. 109
- Article
26
- Brooklyn Law Review, 2022, v. 87, n. 2, p. 749
- Article
27
- Texas Intellectual Property Law Journal, 2014, v. 23, n. 1, p. 25
- Article
28
- Journal of Cultural Economy, 2017, v. 10, n. 3, p. 296, doi. 10.1080/17530350.2017.1287765
- Article
29
- Tax Lawyer, 2014, v. 68, n. 1, p. 263
- Article
30
- Boston College Law Review, 2016, v. 57, n. 2, p. 381
- Article
31
- Journal of Science & Technology Law, 2011, v. 17, n. 2, p. 173
- Article
32
- Texas Tech Law Review, 2014, v. 46, n. 2, p. 469
- Article
33
- Journal of Intellectual Property Law, 2020, v. 28, n. 1, p. 131
- Article
34
- Journal of Intellectual Property Law, 2020, v. 27, n. 2, p. 137
- Article
35
- Defense Counsel Journal, 2016, v. 83, n. 4, p. 472, doi. 10.12690/0895-0016-83.4.472
- Patel, Anand B.;
- Pade, Jeffrey A.;
- Cundiff, Victoria;
- Newman, Bradford
- Article
36
- American Business Law Journal, 2015, v. 52, n. 4, p. 621, doi. 10.1111/ablj.12053
- Pagnattaro, Marisa Anne;
- Park, Stephen Kim
- Article
38
- Journal of Taxation & Regulation of Financial Institutions, 2016, v. 29, n. 5, p. 21
- ENOCHS, CRAIG;
- MALYSHEV, PETER Y.;
- TURNER, PAUL;
- YUFFEE, MICHAEL
- Article
39
- New York Law School Law Review, 2020, v. 65, n. 1, p. 27
- Article
40
- Florida Bar Journal, 2020, v. 94, n. 6, p. 27
- Article
41
- Iowa Law Review, 2024, v. 109, n. 5, p. 2185
- Article
42
- University of Pittsburgh Law Review, 2023, v. 84, n. 4, p. 827, doi. 10.5195/lawreview.2023.956
- Article
43
- Brooklyn Journal of International Law, 2019, v. 44, n. 2, p. 714
- Article
44
- Alabama Law Review, 2014, v. 66, n. 1, p. 63
- Rowe, Elizabeth A.;
- Mahfood, Daniel M.
- Article
45
- Virginia Law Review, 2015, v. 101, n. 2, p. 317
- Article
46
- Northern Kentucky Law Review, 2014, v. 41, n. 3, p. 339
- Article
47
- Washington & Lee Law Review, 2018, v. 75, n. 4, p. 2207
- Article