Works matching Office of legal counsel
1
- Presidential Studies Quarterly, 2021, v. 51, n. 4, p. 904, doi. 10.1111/psq.12740
- Hollis‐Brusky, Amanda;
- Cui, Isaac
- Article
2
- Cornell Law Review, 2018, v. 103, n. 3, p. 757
- Article
3
- Harvard Law & Policy Review, 2015, v. 9, n. 1, p. 211
- Article
5
- Boston College Law Review, 2021, v. 62, n. 2, p. 515
- Article
6
- Turcology Research, 2022, v. 74, p. 382, doi. 10.54614/JTRI.2022.4562
- Article
7
- Yale Law & Policy Review, 2010, v. 28, n. 2, p. 439
- Article
8
- Journal of the Missouri Bar, 2023, v. 79, n. 5, p. 211
- Article
9
- New York University Journal of Legislation & Public Policy, 2014, v. 17, n. 1, p. 239
- Article
10
- Notre Dame Journal of Law, Ethics & Public Policy, 2021, v. 35, n. 2, p. 723
- Article
11
- Albany Law Review, 2013, v. 76, n. 1, p. 217
- Article
12
- Journal of the Legal Profession, 2022, v. 47, n. 1, p. 87
- Article
14
- Principia Iuris, 2015, v. 12, n. 24, p. 59
- Cárdenas-Hernández, Carlos Alfonso;
- Mendieta-Pineda, Luz Mireya
- Article
15
- Southwestern Law Review, 2019, v. 48, n. 1, p. 151
- Article
16
- Annals of Juridica Sciences / Roczniki Nauk Prawnych, 2021, v. 31, n. 2, p. 77, doi. 10.18290/rnp21312-5
- Article
17
- Church & Law / Kościół i Prawo, 2021, v. 10, n. 1, p. 253, doi. 10.18290/kip21101-14
- Article
18
- Harvard Journal of Law & Public Policy, 2012, v. 35, n. 1, p. 213
- Article
19
- Columbia Law Review, 2010, v. 110, n. 6, p. 1448
- Article
20
- American University International Law Review, 2005, v. 21, n. 1, p. 9
- Rouillard, Louis-Philippe F.
- Article
22
- Revista Derechos y Libertades, 2019, n. 41, p. 181, doi. 10.14679/1214
- Article
23
- CounterPunch, 2011, v. 18, n. 15, p. 1
- Article
24
- Presidential Studies Quarterly, 2014, v. 44, n. 2, p. 328, doi. 10.1111/psq.12116
- Article
25
- Presidential Studies Quarterly, 2011, v. 41, n. 2, p. 393, doi. 10.1111/j.1741-5705.2011.03860.x
- Article
26
- Journal of Law & Politics, 2008, v. 24, n. 1, p. 93
- Article
27
- Administrative Law Review, 2006, v. 58, n. 1, p. 1
- Article
28
- Texas Review of Law & Politics, 2020, v. 24, n. 3, p. 481
- Article
29
- Washington University Global Studies Law Review, 2022, v. 21, n. 2, p. 211
- FUKUDA, KAZUO;
- LIFF, ADAM P.
- Article
30
- North Carolina Law Review, 2024, v. 102, n. 5, p. 1411
- Article
31
- UCLA Law Review, 2007, v. 54, n. 6, p. 1559
- Article
32
- George Washington Law Review, 2020, v. 88, n. 5, p. 1221
- Article
33
- Touro Law Review, 2019, v. 35, n. 2, p. 757
- Article
34
- Zeszyty Prawnicze Biuro Analiz Sejmowej, 2017, v. 54, n. 2, p. 183
- Article
35
- George Mason Law Review, 2019, v. 27, n. 1, p. 263
- Article
36
- American University Journal of Gender, Social Policy & the Law, 2016, v. 24, n. 4, p. 445
- MARIL, ROBIN;
- WARBELOW, SARAH
- Article
37
- Southern California Interdisciplinary Law Journal, 2014, v. 24, n. 1, p. 1
- Article
38
- Utah Law Review, 2014, v. 2014, n. 4, p. 773
- Article
39
- National Lawyers Guild Review, 2009, v. 66, n. 2, p. 110
- Article
40
- University of Arkansas at Little Rock Law Review, 2020, v. 42, n. 3, p. 425
- Article
41
- Harvard Human Rights Journal, 2007, v. 20, p. 263
- Riggs, Kate;
- Blakeley, Richard;
- Marwaha, Jasmine
- Article
42
- University of Pennsylvania Law Review, 2016, v. 164, n. 7, p. 1753
- Article
43
- Political Science Quarterly (Oxford University Press / USA), 2017, v. 132, n. 2, p. 203, doi. 10.1002/polq.12615
- Article
44
- Air Force Law Review, 2018, v. 78, p. 27
- Article
45
- University of Pennsylvania Journal of Constitutional Law, 2021, v. 23, n. 4, p. 753
- Article
46
- Appraisal Journal, 1988, v. 56, n. 3, p. 406
- Article
47
- 2021
- Zettler, Patricia J.;
- Shah, Seema K.
- Editorial
49
- Presidential Studies Quarterly, 2012, v. 42, n. 1, p. 176, doi. 10.1111/j.1741-5705.2012.03947.x
- Article
50
- Bifocal, 2009, v. 31, n. 2, p. 26
- Article