Works matching DE "JUDICIAL restraint"
2
- Indiana Law Journal, 2014, v. 89, n. 2, p. 605
- Article
3
- Revista Jurídica (0103-3506), 2017, v. 2, n. 47, p. 223, doi. 10.6084/m9.figshare.5186296
- De Lima Neto, Manoel Cavalcante;
- Lessa Pierre, Victor Hugo;
- Da Costa, Carlos Eugênio Silva;
- De Almeida, Daniel Cabral
- Article
4
- Boston University Law Review, 2015, v. 95, n. 6, p. 1801
- Article
5
- Boston University Law Review, 2015, v. 95, n. 6, p. 1745
- Article
6
- University of New South Wales Law Journal, 2018, v. 41, n. 2, p. 380, doi. 10.53637/xhpu9987
- Article
7
- Judicial Review, 2016, v. 21, n. 3, p. 188, doi. 10.1080/10854681.2016.1238587
- Article
8
- Law Library Journal, 2022, v. 114, n. 2, p. 167
- Article
9
- Presidential Studies Quarterly, 2016, v. 46, n. 2, p. 387, doi. 10.1111/psq.12275
- Article
10
- Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics, 2018, v. 46, n. 2, p. 514, doi. 10.1177/1073110518782959
- Hamm, Brandon;
- Esplin, Bryn S.
- Article
11
- International Studies Quarterly, 2020, v. 64, n. 4, p. 770, doi. 10.1093/isq/sqaa047
- Stiansen, Øyvind;
- Voeten, Erik
- Article
13
- Administrative Law Review, 2014, v. 66, n. 3, p. 565
- Article
14
- American Journal of Legal History, 2020, v. 60, n. 2, p. 169, doi. 10.1093/ajlh/njaa006
- Article
15
- Texas Review of Law & Politics, 2024, v. 28, n. 2, p. 699
- Article
16
- Public Health Ethics, 2014, v. 7, n. 2, p. 112, doi. 10.1093/phe/pht040
- Article
17
- Human Rights Law Review, 2024, v. 24, n. 1, p. 1, doi. 10.1093/hrlr/ngad032
- Article
18
- Wake Forest Law Review, 2013, v. 48, n. 4, p. 989
- Article
19
- Creighton Law Review, 2023, v. 56, n. 4, p. 455
- Article
20
- Canadian Journal of Criminology & Criminal Justice, 2016, v. 58, n. 1, p. 117, doi. 10.3138/cjccj.2015.E17b
- Article
21
- Canadian Journal of Criminology & Criminal Justice, 2016, v. 58, n. 1, p. 87, doi. 10.3138/cjccj.2015.E17
- Article
22
- Canadian Journal of Criminology & Criminal Justice, 2013, v. 55, n. 4, p. 481, doi. 10.3138/cjccj.2012.ES05
- Article
23
- Chicago-Kent Law Review, 2014, v. 89, n. 3, p. 1065
- Article
24
- Harvard Law & Policy Review, 2023, v. 17, n. 2, p. 441
- Article
25
- Harvard Law & Policy Review, 2023, v. 17, n. 2, p. 389
- Article
26
- FIU Law Review, 2017, v. 12, n. 2, p. 309
- Article
27
- King's Law Journal, 2021, v. 32, n. 3, p. 466, doi. 10.1080/09615768.2021.1975590
- Mallory, Conall;
- Tyrrell, Hélène
- Article
28
- Vanderbilt Law Review, 2017, v. 70, n. 6, p. 845
- Article
29
- Vanderbilt Law Review, 2017, v. 70, n. 3, p. 845
- Article
30
- San Diego Law Review, 2019, v. 56, n. 1, p. 221
- Article
31
- San Diego Law Review, 2019, v. 56, n. 1, p. 221
- Article
32
- Marquette Law Review, 2019, v. 103, n. 1, p. 237
- Article
33
- Marquette Law Review, 2015, v. 98, n. 3, p. 1425
- Article
35
- Texas Law Review, 2019, v. 98, n. 2, p. 215
- Article
36
- Texas Law Review, 2013, v. 91, n. 6, p. 1349
- Article
37
- Minnesota Law Review, 2020, v. 104, n. 3, p. 1647
- Article
38
- Education Next, 2017, v. 17, n. 4, p. 50
- Article
39
- Education Next, 2014, v. 14, n. 4, p. 5
- Article
40
- Journal of Criminal Law, 2014, v. 78, n. 6, p. 511, doi. 10.1177/0022018314557413
- Article
41
- Zeitschrift für Parlamentsfragen, 2013, v. 44, n. 3, p. 629
- Article
42
- Touro Law Review, 2024, v. 39, n. 3, p. 871
- Article
43
- Touro Law Review, 2024, v. 39, n. 3, p. 823
- Article
45
- Manitoba Law Journal, 2023, v. 46, n. 2, p. 21
- Article
46
- Loyola of Los Angeles Law Review, 2019, v. 50, n. 3, p. 233
- Article
47
- DePaul Law Review, 2014, v. 63, n. 4, p. 1093
- Article
48
- Ecology Law Quarterly, 2019, v. 46, n. 3, p. 731, doi. 10.15779/Z38M03XX8R
- Article
49
- Brooklyn Law Review, 2024, v. 89, n. 3, p. 853
- Article
50
- Harvard Journal of Law & Public Policy, 2018, v. 41, n. 1, p. 409
- Article