Works matching DE "GETTIER problem"
1
- Acta Analytica, 2014, v. 29, n. 3, p. 363, doi. 10.1007/s12136-013-0207-3
- Article
2
- Acta Analytica, 2014, v. 29, n. 3, p. 377, doi. 10.1007/s12136-014-0235-7
- Article
3
- Acta Analytica, 2012, v. 27, n. 2, p. 183, doi. 10.1007/s12136-011-0144-y
- Article
4
- British Journal for the History of Philosophy, 2017, v. 25, n. 6, p. 1216, doi. 10.1080/09608788.2017.1320968
- Article
5
- Southern Illinois University Law Journal, 2018, v. 42, n. 3, p. 409
- Article
6
- Legal Theory, 2011, v. 17, n. 1, p. 75, doi. 10.1017/S135232521100005X
- Article
8
- European Journal of Philosophy, 2013, v. 21, n. 1, p. 37, doi. 10.1111/j.1468-0378.2010.00433.x
- Article
9
- Filozofia, 2013, v. 68, n. 8, p. 679
- Article
10
- Epistemologia, 2015, v. 38, n. 1, p. 68, doi. 10.3280/epis2015-001005
- Article
11
- Crítica, 2010, v. 42, n. 125, p. 47, doi. 10.22201/iifs.18704905e.2010.871
- Article
12
- Ratio, 2014, v. 27, n. 3, p. 291, doi. 10.1111/rati.12044
- Article
13
- Metaphilosophy, 2016, v. 47, n. 3, p. 449, doi. 10.1111/meta.12194
- Article
14
- Philosophia, 2023, v. 51, n. 4, p. 1865, doi. 10.1007/s11406-023-00649-6
- Article
15
- Philosophia, 2013, v. 41, n. 1, p. 171, doi. 10.1007/s11406-013-9418-5
- Article
17
- Nous (0029-4624), 2018, v. 52, n. 4, p. 836, doi. 10.1111/nous.12197
- Article
18
- Nous (0029-4624), 2017, v. 51, n. 3, p. 645, doi. 10.1111/nous.12110
- Machery, Edouard;
- Stich, Stephen;
- Rose, David;
- Chatterjee, Amita;
- Karasawa, Kaori;
- Struchiner, Noel;
- Sirker, Smita;
- Usui, Naoki;
- Hashimoto, Takaaki
- Article
20
- Philosophy & Phenomenological Research, 2024, v. 108, n. 2, p. 374, doi. 10.1111/phpr.12977
- Article
21
- Philosophy & Phenomenological Research, 2021, v. 103, n. 2, p. 359, doi. 10.1111/phpr.12719
- Article
22
- Philosophy & Phenomenological Research, 2017, v. 94, n. 3, p. 606, doi. 10.1111/phpr.12253
- Article
23
- Philosophy & Phenomenological Research, 2014, v. 89, n. 2, p. 373, doi. 10.1111/phpr.12062
- Article
24
- Philosophy & Phenomenological Research, 2010, v. 80, n. 2, p. 447, doi. 10.1111/j.1933-1592.2010.00323.x
- COMESAÑA, JUAN;
- KANTIN, HOLLY
- Article
25
- Philosophy of Science / Filozofia Nauki, 2021, v. 29, n. 2, p. 115, doi. 10.14394/filnau.2021.0010
- Article
26
- Australasian Journal of Philosophy, 2016, v. 94, n. 1, p. 152, doi. 10.1080/00048402.2015.1009127
- de Almeida, Claudio;
- Fett, J.R.
- Article
27
- Inquiry, 2013, v. 56, n. 4, p. 400, doi. 10.1080/0020174X.2013.816087
- Cohen, Stewart;
- Comesaña, Juan
- Article
28
- Inquiry, 2013, v. 56, n. 1, p. 77, doi. 10.1080/0020174X.2013.775016
- Article
29
- Inquiry, 2013, v. 56, n. 1, p. 54, doi. 10.1080/0020174X.2013.775014
- Article
30
- Inquiry, 2013, v. 56, n. 1, p. 15, doi. 10.1080/0020174X.2013.775012
- Cohen, Stewart;
- Comesaña, Juan
- Article
31
- Kriterion, 2017, v. 31, n. 3, p. 25, doi. 10.1515/krt-2017-310303
- Article
32
- Analysis, 2018, v. 78, n. 3, p. 396, doi. 10.1093/analys/anx131
- Article
33
- Synthese, 2014, v. 191, n. 17, p. 4115, doi. 10.1007/s11229-014-0523-1
- Article
34
- Synthese, 2014, v. 191, n. 7, p. 1391, doi. 10.1007/s11229-013-0334-9
- Article
35
- Synthese, 2014, v. 191, n. 6, p. 1119, doi. 10.1007/s11229-013-0315-z
- Article
36
- Synthese, 2012, v. 184, n. 3, p. 247, doi. 10.1007/s11229-010-9773-8
- Article
37
- Synthese, 2012, v. 184, n. 3, p. 287, doi. 10.1007/s11229-010-9815-2
- Article
38
- Synthese, 2012, v. 184, n. 3, p. 431, doi. 10.1007/s11229-010-9821-4
- Article
39
- Synthese, 2011, v. 180, n. 3, p. 391, doi. 10.1007/s11229-009-9708-4
- Article
40
- Teorema, 2016, v. 35, n. 1, p. 89
- Article
41
- Dialogue: Canadian Philosophical Review, 2008, v. 47, n. 3/4, p. 565, doi. 10.1017/S0012217300002845
- Article
42
- Logos & Episteme, 2018, v. 9, n. 1, p. 75, doi. 10.5840/logos-episteme2018915
- Article
43
- Logos & Episteme, 2017, v. 8, n. 1, p. 129, doi. 10.5840/logos-episteme2017818
- Article
44
- Logos & Episteme, 2017, v. 8, n. 1, p. 47, doi. 10.5840/logos-episteme2017813
- Article
45
- Logos & Episteme, 2016, v. 7, n. 1, p. 31, doi. 10.5840/logos-episteme2016712
- Article
46
- Logos & Episteme, 2015, v. 6, n. 3, p. 371, doi. 10.5840/logos-episteme20156328
- Article
47
- Logos & Episteme, 2014, v. 5, n. 3, p. 265, doi. 10.5840/logos-episteme2014532
- Article
48
- Logos & Episteme, 2014, v. 5, n. 2, p. 133, doi. 10.5840/logos-episteme20145212
- Article
49
- Logos & Episteme, 2012, v. 3, n. 3, p. 505, doi. 10.5840/logos-episteme20123329
- Article
50
- Philosophical Studies, 2011, v. 155, n. 3, p. 383, doi. 10.1007/s11098-010-9576-2
- Article