Works matching Originalism
1
- Judges Forum Review / Revista Forumul Judecătorilor, 2018, n. 1, p. 15
- Article
2
- Persona y Derecho, 2015, n. 73, p. 61, doi. 10.15581/011.73.61-115
- Article
3
- Collected Papers of the Law Faculty of the University of Rijeka / Zbornik Pravnog Fakulteta Sveučilišta u Rijeci, 2024, v. 45, n. 3, p. 649, doi. 10.30925/zpfsr.45.3.7
- Jarak, Niko;
- Vuković, Ana Horvat
- Article
4
- Zagreb Law Review, 2024, v. 13, n. 2, p. 296
- Article
5
- Malaysian Journal of Law & Society, 2024, v. 34, n. 1, p. 15, doi. 10.17576/juum-2024-3401-02
- Shuaib, Farid Sufian;
- Mahmud, Fariza Milaqurshiah
- Article
6
- American Journal of Criminal Justice, 2017, v. 42, n. 1, p. 28, doi. 10.1007/s12103-016-9354-6
- Buckler, Kevin;
- Gilmore, Elizabeth
- Article
7
- Revista de Estudos Constitucionais, Hermenêutica e Teoria do Direito, 2011, v. 3, n. 1, p. 56, doi. 10.4013/rechtd.2011.31.06
- Article
8
- Jurisprudence, 2016, v. 7, n. 2, p. 267, doi. 10.1080/20403313.2015.1065644
- Article
10
- Harvard Journal of Law & Public Policy, 2023, v. 46, n. 3, p. 957
- Article
11
- Boston University Law Review, 2012, v. 92, n. 4, p. 1213
- Article
12
- Hofstra Law Review, 2018, v. 47, n. 2, p. 741
- Article
13
- Communication Law & Policy, 2012, v. 17, n. 4, p. 329, doi. 10.1080/10811680.2012.717491
- Article
14
- Yale Law Journal, 2023, v. 133, n. 1, p. 99
- BLOCHER, JOSEPH;
- RUBEN, ERIC
- Article
15
- Yale Law Journal, 2017, v. 127, n. 1, p. 156
- Article
16
- Creighton Law Review, 2023, v. 56, n. 4, p. 499
- Article
17
- Maryland Law Review, 2014, v. 74, n. 1, p. 79
- Article
21
- Duke Law Journal, 2023, v. 72, n. 5, p. 941
- Article
22
- Columbia Law Review, 2016, v. 116, n. 7, p. 1639
- Article
23
- Columbia Law Review, 2015, v. 115, n. 8, p. 2349
- Article
24
- Harvard Law & Policy Review, 2024, v. 18, n. 2, p. 221
- Article
25
- Law & History Review, 2019, v. 37, n. 3, p. 809, doi. 10.1017/S0738248019000452
- Baude, William;
- Sachs, Stephen E.
- Article
26
- Law & History Review, 2019, v. 37, n. 3, p. 821, doi. 10.1017/S0738248019000427
- Article
27
- Law & History Review, 2019, v. 37, n. 3, p. 847, doi. 10.1017/S0738248019000373
- Sawyer III, Logan Everett
- Article
28
- Law & History Review, 2019, v. 37, n. 3, p. 743, doi. 10.1017/S0738248019000348
- Article
29
- Law & History Review, 2019, v. 37, n. 3, p. 787, doi. 10.1017/S0738248019000336
- Article
30
- Michigan Law Review, 2025, v. 123, n. 6, p. 1185, doi. 10.36644/mlr.123.6.some
- Article
31
- Law & Philosophy, 2015, v. 34, n. 4, p. 397, doi. 10.1007/s10982-015-9227-z
- Article
32
- Yale Journal of Law & the Humanities, 2013, v. 25, n. 1, p. 101
- Article
33
- Yale Journal of Law & the Humanities, 2013, v. 25, n. 1, p. 1
- Article
34
- Osgoode Hall Law Journal, 2016, v. 53, n. 3, p. 745, doi. 10.60082/2817-5069.3037
- Article
35
- North Dakota Law Review, 2024, v. 99, n. 1, p. 27
- Article
36
- Harvard Journal of Law & Public Policy, 2023, v. 46, n. 3, p. 1217
- Article
37
- Harvard Journal of Law & Public Policy, 2023, v. 46, n. 3, p. 1197
- Article
38
- Harvard Journal of Law & Public Policy, 2015, v. 38, n. 3, p. 817
- Article
39
- Constitutional Commentary, 2012, v. 28, n. 1, p. 37
- Article
40
- Northwestern University Law Review, 2013, v. 107, n. 4, p. 1627
- Article
41
- University of Illinois Law Review, 2012, v. 2012, n. 3, p. 815
- Article
42
- University of Illinois Law Review, 2012, v. 2012, n. 3, p. 669
- Article
43
- University of Illinois Law Review, 2012, v. 2012, n. 3, p. 611
- Article
45
- Vanderbilt Journal of Transnational Law, 2011, v. 44, n. 5, p. 1239
- Article
46
- Minnesota Law Review, 2012, v. 97, n. 2, p. 625
- Article
47
- Washington & Lee Law Review, 2021, v. 78, n. 1, p. 231
- Haupt, Claudia E.;
- Parmet, Wendy E.
- Article
48
- Melbourne University Law Review, 2017, v. 41, n. 1, p. 182
- Article
49
- Arizona Law Review, 2022, v. 64, n. 3, p. 733
- Mills, John;
- Sternstein, Aliya
- Article
50
- Arizona Law Review, 2011, v. 53, n. 3, p. 827
- Article