Works matching Trial by jury and the Supreme Court
1
- Demokratizatsiya, 2006, v. 14, n. 1, p. 42, doi. 10.3200/DEMO.14.1.42-58
- Article
2
- Journal of Southern Legal History, 2019, v. 27, p. 1
- Article
3
- Mercer Law Review, 2023, v. 74, n. 2, p. 751
- Article
4
- Utah Law Review, 2009, v. 2009, n. 1, p. 219
- Article
5
- Tennessee Bar Journal, 2020, v. 56, n. 6, p. 12
- Article
6
- Rutgers Law Journal, 2011, v. 42, n. 4, p. 1023
- Article
7
- Washburn Law Journal, 2013, v. 53, n. 1, p. 147
- Article
9
- Journal of Australian Studies, 2020, v. 44, n. 3, p. 334, doi. 10.1080/14443058.2020.1790630
- Article
10
- Denver Law Review, 2017, v. 94, n. 2, p. 385
- Article
11
- Denver Law Review, 2017, v. 94, n. 2, p. 385
- Article
12
- Journal of Criminal Law, Criminology & Police Science, 1971, v. 62, n. 4, p. 497, doi. 10.2307/1141701
- Article
13
- Iowa Law Review, 2014, v. 99, n. 2, p. 919
- Article
14
- Yale Law Journal, 2013, v. 123, n. 1, p. 208
- Article
15
- Tennessee Bar Journal, 2006, v. 42, n. 11, p. 6
- Article
16
- California Law Review, 2012, v. 100, n. 1, p. 183
- Article
17
- University of Pennsylvania Journal of Constitutional Law, 2022, v. 24, n. 4, p. 817
- Article
18
- Oregon Law Review, 2018, v. 96, n. 2, p. 725
- Article
19
- Oregon Law Review, 2018, v. 96, n. 2, p. 691
- Article
20
- Oregon Law Review, 2018, v. 96, n. 2, p. 707
- Article
21
- Oregon Law Review, 2018, v. 96, n. 2, p. 673
- Article
22
- Oregon Law Review, 2018, v. 96, n. 2, p. 489
- PECK, ROBERT S.;
- CHEMERINSKY, ERWIN
- Article
23
- Oregon Law Review, 2018, v. 96, n. 2, p. 561
- Article
24
- Oregon Law Review, 2018, v. 96, n. 2, p. 585
- Article
25
- Oregon Law Review, 2018, v. 96, n. 2, p. 599
- Article
26
- Oregon Law Review, 2018, v. 96, n. 2, p. 621
- Article
27
- Oregon Law Review, 2018, v. 96, n. 2, p. 479
- Article
28
- Oregon Law Review, 2018, v. 96, n. 2, p. 677
- Article
29
- Widener Commonwealth Law Review, 2025, v. 34, n. 1, p. 71
- Article
30
- Revista Vasca de Derecho Procesal y Arbitraje, 2022, v. 34, n. 3, p. 123
- Ruiz Giraldo, Rocío;
- Ruiz Yamuza, Florentino Gregorio
- Article
31
- Journal of Corporation Law, 2025, v. 50, n. 3, p. 807
- Article
32
- International Journal of Punishment & Sentencing, 2011, v. 7, n. 2, p. 39
- Article
33
- Bench & Bar of Minnesota, 2020, v. 77, n. 7, p. 24
- ENGELMEIER, SHEILA;
- TABERY, HEATHER
- Article
34
- Denver Law Review, 2019, v. 97, n. 1, p. 117
- Article
35
- Boston College Journal of Law & Social Justice, 2013, v. 33, n. 2, p. 453
- Article
36
- Journal of Criminal Law & Criminology, 2023, v. 113, n. 1, p. 1
- ALBRECHT, KAT;
- FILIP, KAITLYN
- Article
37
- Journal of Criminal Law & Criminology, 2017, v. 107, n. 1, p. 1
- Article
38
- California Law Review, 1950, v. 38, n. 2, p. 340, doi. 10.2307/3478068
- Article
39
- BYU Journal of Public Law, 2014, v. 28, n. 2, p. 471
- Article
40
- BYU Journal of Public Law, 2003, v. 17, n. 2, p. 323
- Article
41
- Arbitration Journal, 1987, v. 42, n. 3, p. 68
- Article
42
- American Business Law Journal, 1967, v. 5, n. 2, p. 191, doi. 10.1111/j.1744-1714.1967.tb01062.x
- Article
43
- Journal of Criminal Law, Criminology & Police Science, 1972, v. 63, n. 4, p. 500, doi. 10.2307/1141801
- Article
46
- Journal of Criminal Law, Criminology & Police Science, 1956, v. 47, n. 1, p. 64, doi. 10.2307/1140196
- Article
47
- University of Illinois Law Review, 2011, v. 2011, n. 3, p. 961
- Article
48
- William & Mary Law Review, 2008, v. 50, n. 1, p. 267
- Article
49
- University of Chicago Law Review, 2011, v. 78, n. 4, p. 1133
- Article
50
- Monthly Labor Review, 1978, v. 101, n. 4, p. 51
- Article