Works matching Parens patriae doctrine (Law)
1
- Washington University Global Studies Law Review, 2015, v. 14, n. 2, p. 317
- Article
2
- Utah Law Review, 2012, v. 2012, n. 3, p. 1611
- Quinn, Mary Joy;
- Krooks, Howard S.
- Article
3
- Widener Commonwealth Law Review, 2019, v. 28, n. 2, p. 169
- Article
4
- University of Memphis Law Review, 2012, v. 42, n. 3, p. 831
- Article
5
- Juvenile & Family Court Journal, 2014, v. 65, n. 3, p. 1, doi. 10.1111/jfcj.12020
- Article
6
- William & Mary Law Review, 2013, v. 54, n. 5, p. 1753
- Article
7
- Classicum, 2018, v. 44, n. 1, p. 2
- Article
8
- Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics, 2017, v. 45, n. 4, p. 688, doi. 10.1177/1073110517750608
- Article
9
- Health Law & Policy, 2014, v. 7, n. 2, p. 1
- Article
10
- North Carolina Law Review, 2023, v. 101, n. 5, p. 1427
- HARBACH, MEREDITH JOHNSON
- Article
11
- Houston Law Review, 2012, v. 49, n. 2, p. 291
- Koenig, Thomas H.;
- Rustad, Michael L.
- Article
12
- Journal of Law & Health, 2024, v. 37, n. 2, p. 52
- PFEFFER BILLAUER, BARBARA
- Article
13
- Social Issues & Policy Review, 2012, v. 6, n. 1, p. 26, doi. 10.1111/j.1751-2409.2011.01034.x
- Brank, Eve M.;
- Scott, Leroy
- Article
14
- Australasian Canadian Studies, 1985, v. 3, p. 70
- Article
15
- Vanderbilt Law Review, 2013, v. 66, n. 4, p. 1309
- Article
16
- University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform, 2019, v. 52, n. 4, p. 581
- Article
17
- University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform, 2012, v. 45, n. 3, p. 561, doi. 10.36646/mjlr.45.3.when
- Article
18
- Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, 2020, v. 40, n. 4, p. 682, doi. 10.1093/ojls/gqaa019
- Brown, Jonathan;
- Christie, Sarah
- Article
19
- Loyola Law Review, 2018, v. 64, n. 1, p. 257
- Article
20
- Kansas Journal of Law & Public Policy, 2012, v. 21, n. 2, p. 254
- Article
21
- Canterbury Law Review, 2010, v. 16, p. 127
- Article
23
- Liverpool Law Review, 2019, v. 40, n. 3, p. 227, doi. 10.1007/s10991-019-09235-x
- Article
24
- Boston University Public Interest Law Journal, 2011, v. 20, n. 2, p. 321
- Article
25
- Cumberland Law Review, 2014, v. 44, n. 2, p. 181
- Article
26
- Hofstra Law Review, 2015, v. 43, n. 4, p. 1003
- Article
27
- Edinburgh Law Review, 2017, v. 21, n. 2, p. 247, doi. 10.3366/elr.2017.0416
- Carruthers, J M;
- Crawford, E B
- Article
28
- University of Chicago Law Review, 2011, v. 78, n. 1, p. 345
- Article
29
- Journal of Land Use & Environmental Law, 2011, v. 26, n. 2, p. 217
- Article
30
- Harvard Journal of Law & Public Policy, 2021, v. 44, n. 1, p. 339
- Article
31
- William & Mary Environmental Law & Policy Review, 2015, v. 40, n. 1, p. 65
- SMITH II, GEORGE P.;
- STEENBURG, DAVID M.
- Article
32
- Widener Law Review, 2014, v. 20, n. 2, p. 209
- Article
33
- George Mason University Civil Rights Law Journal, 2021, v. 31, n. 2, p. 135
- Article
34
- George Mason Law Review, 2013, v. 20, n. 2, p. 631
- Article
35
- Journal of Health Care Law & Policy, 2011, v. 14, n. 2, p. 331
- RUSTAD, MICHAEL L.;
- KOENIG, THOMAS H.
- Article
36
- Maryland Law Review, 2023, v. 82, n. 4, p. 1103
- Article
37
- Journal of Law & the Biosciences, 2016, v. 3, n. 3, p. 576, doi. 10.1093/jlb/lsw039
- Article
38
- Journal of Law & the Biosciences, 2015, v. 2, n. 2, p. 459, doi. 10.1093/jlb/lsv028
- Article
39
- Family Court Review, 2016, v. 54, n. 3, p. 512, doi. 10.1111/fcre.12227
- Article
40
- Northwestern University Law Review, 2021, v. 116, n. 2, p. 515
- Article
41
- SMU Law Review, 2016, v. 69, n. 4, p. 759
- Article
43
- Tulane Law Review, 2015, v. 89, n. 4, p. 869
- Article
44
- New England Law Review, 2012, v. 47, n. 1, p. 189
- Article
45
- Emory International Law Review, 2022, v. 36, n. 1, p. 201
- Article
46
- Oregon Law Review, 2015, v. 94, n. 1, p. 1
- Article
48
- Natural Resources Journal, 2019, v. 59, n. 1, p. 59
- Regalia, Joseph;
- Hall, Noah D.
- Article
49
- Natural Resources Journal, 2011, v. 51, n. 2, p. 189
- Article
50
- New York University Journal of Law & Liberty, 2017, v. 11, n. 3, p. 1089
- Article