Works matching IS 0028646X AND DT 1992 AND VI 120 AND IP 4
1
- New Phytologist, 1992, v. 120, n. 4, p. 592
- Article
2
- New Phytologist, 1992, v. 120, n. 4, p. 583, doi. 10.1111/j.1469-8137.1992.tb01807.x
- Article
3
- New Phytologist, 1992, v. 120, n. 4, p. 581
- Article
4
- New Phytologist, 1992, v. 120, n. 4, p. 579
- Article
10
- New Phytologist, 1992, v. 120, n. 4, p. 561, doi. 10.1111/j.1469-8137.1992.tb01806.x
- Article
11
- New Phytologist, 1992, v. 120, n. 4, p. 551, doi. 10.1111/j.1469-8137.1992.tb01805.x
- Article
12
- New Phytologist, 1992, v. 120, n. 4, p. 543, doi. 10.1111/j.1469-8137.1992.tb01804.x
- Article
13
- New Phytologist, 1992, v. 120, n. 4, p. 535, doi. 10.1111/j.1469-8137.1992.tb01803.x
- Article
14
- New Phytologist, 1992, v. 120, n. 4, p. 525, doi. 10.1111/j.1469-8137.1992.tb01802.x
- Article
15
- New Phytologist, 1992, v. 120, n. 4, p. 475, doi. 10.1111/j.1469-8137.1992.tb01795.x
- Article
16
- New Phytologist, 1992, v. 120, n. 4, p. 517, doi. 10.1111/j.1469-8137.1992.tb01801.x
- Article
17
- New Phytologist, 1992, v. 120, n. 4, p. 505, doi. 10.1111/j.1469-8137.1992.tb01799.x
- Article
18
- New Phytologist, 1992, v. 120, n. 4, p. 495, doi. 10.1111/j.1469-8137.1992.tb01798.x
- Article
19
- New Phytologist, 1992, v. 120, n. 4, p. 489, doi. 10.1111/j.1469-8137.1992.tb01797.x
- Article
20
- New Phytologist, 1992, v. 120, n. 4, p. 481, doi. 10.1111/j.1469-8137.1992.tb01796.x
- Article
21
- New Phytologist, 1992, v. 120, n. 4, p. 509, doi. 10.1111/j.1469-8137.1992.tb01800.x
- Article
22
- New Phytologist, 1992, v. 120, n. 4, p. 463, doi. 10.1111/j.1469-8137.1992.tb01794.x
- Article
23
- New Phytologist, 1992, v. 120, n. 4, p. 453, doi. 10.1111/j.1469-8137.1992.tb01792.x
- Article
24
- New Phytologist, 1992, v. 120, n. 4, p. 459, doi. 10.1111/j.1469-8137.1992.tb01793.x
- Article