UNITED STATES V. MCINTOSH: NINTH CIRCUIT LIMITS FEDERAL PROSECUTORS FROM SPENDING TO ENFORCE MARIJUANA LAWS IN MEDICINAL STATES.Published in:St. Mary's Law Journal, 2017, v. 48, n. 3, p. 573By:HALEY, DANIELPublication type:Article
THE EXCLUSIONARY RULE AND THE DUELING LEGACIES OF UTAH V. STRIEFF: WHICH WILL BE SUPPRESSED?Published in:St. Mary's Law Journal, 2017, v. 48, n. 3, p. 583By:HERRERA, MARCOSPublication type:Article
THE DEMISE OF ANTI-PANHANDLING LAWS IN AMERICA.Published in:St. Mary's Law Journal, 2017, v. 48, n. 3, p. 543By:NEIDIG, KATIE PILGRAMPublication type:Article
NO APPROPRIATION WITHOUT COMPENSATION: HOW PER SE TAKINGS OF PERSONAL PROPERTY CHECK THE POWER TO REGULATE COMMERCE.Published in:St. Mary's Law Journal, 2017, v. 48, n. 3, p. 509By:MACDANIEL, WILLIAM SUMNERPublication type:Article
A NEW REMEDY FOR JUNK SCIENCE: ARTICLE 11.073 AND TEXAS'S RESPONSE TO THE CHANGING LANDSCAPE IN THE FORENSIC SCIENCES.Published in:St. Mary's Law Journal, 2017, v. 48, n. 3, p. 465By:ROSSON, TREVORPublication type:Article
THE "ENGLISH" RULE--IT AIN'T ENGLISH, AND OUGHT NOT BE AMERICAN.Published in:St. Mary's Law Journal, 2017, v. 48, n. 3, p. 443By:MULLIGAN, TIMOTHY M.Publication type:Article