When is it 'cruel and unusual punishment'? Supreme Court bans juvenile death penalty.
- Published in:
- 2005
- By:
- Publication type:
- Journal Article
Works matching Cruel and unusual punishment and the Supreme Court
Results: 124
1
2
When Is It 'Cruel and Unusual Punishment'? Supreme Court Bans Juvenile Death Penalty.
- Published in:
- Psychiatric Times, 2005, v. 22, n. 6, p. 1
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
3
IS POWELL STILL VALID? THE SUPREME COURT'S CHANGING STANCE ON CRUEL AND UNUSUAL PUNISHMENT.
- Published in:
- Virginia Law Review, 2018, v. 104, n. 3, p. 547
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
4
SENTENCING AND PUNISHMENT--CRUEL AND UNUSUAL PUNISHMENT: THE UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT UPHOLDS CALIFORNIA'S THREE STRIKES LAW, RULING THE LAW DOES NOT VIOLATE THE EIGHTH AMENDMENT'S PROHIBITION ON CRUEL AND UNUSUAL PUNISHMENT.
- Published in:
- North Dakota Law Review, 2004, v. 80, n. 3, p. 497
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
5
MOORE V. TEXAS: THE CONTINUED QUEST FOR A NATIONAL STANDARD.
- Published in:
- Denver Law Review, 2018, v. 95, n. 3, p. 781
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
6
EVALUATING PUNISHMENT IN PURGATORY: THE NEED TO SEPARATE PRETRIAL DETAINEES' CONDITIONS-OF-CONFINEMENT CLAIMS FROM INADEQUATE EIGHTH AMENDMENT ANALYSIS.
- Published in:
- Michigan Law Review, 2009, v. 108, n. 3, p. 417
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
7
Banning the Bing: Why Extreme Solitary Confinement Is Cruel and Far Too Usual Punishment.
- Published in:
- Indiana Law Journal, 2015, v. 90, n. 2, p. 741
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
8
A DECENT PROPOSAL: EXEMPTING EIGHTEEN- TO TWENTY-YEAR-OLDS FROM THE DEATH PENALTY.
- Published in:
- Review of Law & Social Change, 2016, v. 40, n. 2, p. 139
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
9
THE MOMENTUM BUILDS: CHALLENGING LIFETIME REGISTRATION OF JUVENILES CONVICTED OF SEXUAL OFFENSES IN THE POST-ROPER ERA.
- Published in:
- Review of Law & Social Change, 2016, v. 40, n. 1, p. 115
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
10
Intended and Unintended Consequences of Prison Reform.
- Published in:
- Journal of Law, Economics & Organization, 2014, v. 30, n. 3, p. 558, doi. 10.1093/jleo/ewt006
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
11
UN-GREGG-ULATED: CAPITAL CHARGING AND THE MISSING MANDATE OF GREGG V. GEORGIA.
- Published in:
- Duke Journal of Constitutional Law & Public Policy, 2016, v. 11, n. 1/2, p. 145
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
12
THE DEATH KNELL FOR THE DEATH PENALTY AND THE SIGNIFICANCE OF GLOBAL REALISM TO ITS ABOLITION FROM GLOSSIP V. GROSS TO BRUMFIELD V. CAIN.
- Published in:
- Duke Journal of Constitutional Law & Public Policy, 2016, v. 11, n. 1/2, p. 107
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
13
GRAHAM V. FLORIDA: JUSTICE KENNEDY'S VISION OF CHILDHOOD AND THE ROLE OF JUDGES.
- Published in:
- 2010
- By:
- Publication type:
- Essay
14
Failing the Grade: How the Use of Corporal Punishment in U.S. Public Schools Demonstrates the Need for U.S. Ratification of the Children's Rights Convention and the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities.
- Published in:
- New York Law School Law Review, 2009, v. 54, n. 3, p. 1035
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
15
RISKING SUFFERING: HOW BUCKLEW V. PRECYTHE WEAKENED EIGHTH AMENDMENT PROTECTIONS.
- Published in:
- South Dakota Law Review, 2021, v. 66, n. 2, p. 338
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
16
FLAWLESS EXECUTION: EXAMINING WAYS TO REDUCE SOUTH DAKOTA'S LETHAL INJECTION RISKS.
- Published in:
- South Dakota Law Review, 2012, v. 57, n. 1, p. 98
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
17
BRANDED FOR LIFE: THE UNCONSTITUTIONALITY OF MANDATORYAND LIFETIME JUVENILE SEX OFFENDER REGISTRATION AND NOTIFICATION.
- Published in:
- Virginia Journal of Social Policy & the Law, 2014, v. 21, n. 1, p. 167
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
18
Offenders with Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities: Sentencing Challenges after the Abolition of Execution in the United States.
- Published in:
- 2016
- By:
- Publication type:
- Editorial
19
A Failure to Implement: Analyzing State Responses to the Supreme Court's Directives in Atkins v. Virginia and Suggestions for a National Standard.
- Published in:
- Psychiatry, Psychology & Law, 2014, v. 21, n. 1, p. 16, doi. 10.1080/13218719.2013.773847
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
20
MADISON V. ALABAMA: THE UNFULFILLED PROMISE OF FORD.
- Published in:
- Denver Law Review, 2020, v. 97, n. 3, p. 597
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
21
Prisons and prisoners... double calling.
- Published in:
- American Bar Association Journal, 1981, v. 67, n. 8, p. 1035
- Publication type:
- Article
22
Race, Intellectual Disability, and Death: An Empirical Inquiry Into Invidious Influences on Atkins Determinations.
- Published in:
- UCLA Law Review, 2019, v. 66, n. 6, p. 1506
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
23
Unlocking the Gates of Desolation Row.
- Published in:
- UCLA Law Review, 2012, v. 59, n. 6, p. 1810
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
24
CONSTITUTIONAL LIBERTY AND THE PROGRESSION OF PUNISHMENT.
- Published in:
- Cornell Law Review, 2017, v. 102, n. 2, p. 413
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
25
OUR BROKEN DEATH PENALTY.
- Published in:
- 2014
- By:
- Publication type:
- Speech
26
Deadly statistics: quantifying an 'unacceptable risk' in capital punishment.
- Published in:
- Law, Probability & Risk, 2017, v. 16, n. 1, p. 7, doi. 10.1093/lpr/mgw012
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
27
"Permanently Incorrigible" Is a Patently Ineffective Standard: Reforming the Administration of Juvenile Life Without Parole.
- Published in:
- George Washington Law Review, 2020, v. 88, n. 1, p. 239
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
28
CHALLENGING AN EXECUTION AFTER PROLONGED CONFINEMENT ON DEATH ROW [LACKEY REVISITED].
- Published in:
- 2009
- By:
- Publication type:
- Opinion
29
DEVOLVING STANDARDS OF DECENCY: HOW EIGHTH AMENDMENT JURISPRUDENCE FAILS TRANSGENDER INMATES SEEKING NECESSARY MEDICAL CARE.
- Published in:
- Wisconsin Journal of Law, Gender & Society, 2021, v. 36, n. 1, p. 59
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
30
Dividing Crime, Multiplying Punishments.
- Published in:
- U.C. Davis Law Review, 2015, v. 48, n. 5, p. 1955
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
31
DETENTION, DISENFRANCHISEMENT, AND DOCTRINAL INTEGRATION.
- Published in:
- Southern California Law Review, 2022, v. 95, n. 2, p. 365
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
32
KILLING ME SOFTLY: SHOULD A RISK OF PAIN DISMISS LETHAL INJECTION AS A METHOD OF CAPITAL PUNISHMENT? AN ANALYSIS OF BAZE V. REES.
- Published in:
- Thurgood Marshall Law Review, 2010, v. 35, n. 3, p. 275
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
33
CRUEL AND UNUSUAL PUNISHMENTS: A COMPARISON OF PUBLIC AND JUDICIAL OPINION.
- Published in:
- Jurimetrics: The Journal of Law, Science & Technology, 2014, v. 54, n. 2, p. 109
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
34
DEMOCRATIZING THE EIGHTH AMENDMENT.
- Published in:
- Villanova Law Review, 2023, v. 68, n. 1, p. 1
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
35
The Ethical “Elephant” in the Death Penalty “Room”.
- Published in:
- American Journal of Bioethics, 2008, v. 8, n. 10, p. 45, doi. 10.1080/15265160802393025
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
36
Decency Comes Full Circle: The Constitutional Demand to End Permanent Solitary Confinement on Death Row.
- Published in:
- Columbia Journal of Law & Social Problems, 2022, v. 56, n. 1, p. 591
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
37
INSTITUTIONAL AND POSTRELEASE BEHAVIOR OF FURMAN-COMMUTED INMATES IN TEXAS.
- Published in:
- Criminology, 1988, v. 26, n. 4, p. 677, doi. 10.1111/j.1745-9125.1988.tb00859.x
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
38
Prohibition of Consideration for Parole as Cruel or Unusual Punishment.
- Published in:
- California Law Review, 1975, v. 63, n. 1, p. 289
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
39
TOWARD MERCY: EXCESSIVE SENTENCING AND THE UNTAPPED POWER OF NORTH CAROLINAÊS CONSTITUTION.
- Published in:
- Elon Law Review, 2024, v. 16, n. 1, p. 55
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
40
A "SUPREMER" COURT?: HOW AN UNFAVORABLE RULING IN THE INTER-AMERICAN COMMISSION ON HUMAN RIGHTS SHOULD IMPACT UNITED STATES DOMESTIC VIOLENCE JURISPRUDENCE.
- Published in:
- Wisconsin International Law Journal, 2010, v. 28, n. 3, p. 430
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
41
FELONY MURDER, JUVENILES, AND CULPABILITY: WHY THE EIGHTH AMENDMENT'S BAN ON CRUEL AND UNUSUAL PUNISHMENT SHOULD PRECLUDE SENTENCING JUVENILES WHO DO NOT KILL, INTEND TO KILL, OR ATTEMPT TO KILL TO DIE IN PRISON.
- Published in:
- Loyola Journal of Public Interest Law, 2014, v. 16, n. 1, p. 99
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
42
THE FALLACY OF EXECUTING TERRORISTS.
- Published in:
- Kansas Journal of Law & Public Policy, 2016, v. 26, n. 1, p. 66
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
43
LIFE, DEATH, AND IQ: IT'S MUCH MORE THAN JUST A SCORE: UNDERSTANDING AND UTILIZING FORENSIC PSYCHOLOGICAL AND NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL EVALUATIONS IN ATKINS INTELLECTUAL DISABILITY/MENTAL RETARDATION CASES.
- Published in:
- Cleveland State Law Review, 2011, v. 59, n. 3, p. 399
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
44
The Writing Is on the Wall: How the Briseno Factors Create an Unacceptable Risk of Executing Persons with Intellectual Disability.
- Published in:
- Texas Law Review, 2016, v. 94, n. 4, p. 743
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
45
Juvenile justice and redemption.
- Published in:
- Bench & Bar of Minnesota, 2016, v. 73, n. 11, p. 2
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
46
Gruel and Unusual: Prison Punishment Diets and the Eighth Amendment.
- Published in:
- Minnesota Law Review, 2022, v. 107, n. 1, p. 475
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
47
Death Delayed Is Retribution Denied.
- Published in:
- Minnesota Law Review, 2014, v. 99, n. 2/3, p. 421
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
48
The Death Penalty: An Unusual Punishment America is Inflicting Upon Itself.
- Published in:
- Critical Criminology, 2011, v. 19, n. 2, p. 107, doi. 10.1007/s10612-010-9115-7
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
49
Diagnosing and Treating "Insanity" on Death Row: Legal and Ethical Perspectives.
- Published in:
- Behavioral Sciences & the Law, 1987, v. 5, n. 2, p. 175, doi. 10.1002/bsl.2370050209
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
50
"Permanently Incorrigible" Is a Patently Ineffective Standard: Reforming the Administration of Juvenile Life Without Parole.
- Published in:
- George Washington Law Review Arguendo, 2020, v. 88, n. 1, p. 239
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article