TAKING COSTS INTO ACCOUNT: MAPPING THE BOUNDARIES OF JUDICIAL AND AGENCY DISCRETION.
- Published in:
- Harvard Environmental Law Review, 2016, v. 40, n. 1, p. 87
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
Works matching DE "MICHIGAN v. Environmental Protection Agency"
Results: 18
1
2
THE POWER CANONS.
- Published in:
- William & Mary Law Review, 2017, v. 58, n. 6, p. 1933
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
3
LOUD AND SOFT ANTI-CHEVRON DECISIONS.
- Published in:
- Wake Forest Law Review, 2018, v. 53, n. 1, p. 37
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
4
UNQUANTIFIED BENEFITS AND THE PROBLEM OF REGULATION UNDER UNCERTAINTY.
- Published in:
- Cornell Law Review, 2016, v. 102, n. 1, p. 87
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
5
Arbitrary and Capricious Cost-(Non)Consideration After Michigan v. EPA.
- Published in:
- George Washington Law Review, 2017, v. 85, n. 5, p. 1514
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
6
Michigan v. EPA: A Mandate for Agencies to Consider Costs.
- Published in:
- Cato Supreme Court Review, 2014, p. 281
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
7
ENVIRONMENTAL LAW.
- Published in:
- Bench & Bar of Minnesota, 2015, v. 72, n. 9, p. 41
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
8
Arbitrary and Capricious Cost-(Non)Consideration After Michigan v. EPA.
- Published in:
- George Washington Law Review Arguendo, 2017, v. 85, n. 5, p. 1514
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
9
POLLUTERS PARADISE: THE DARK CANON OF THE UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT IN POLLUTION CONTROL LAW .
- Published in:
- American University Law Review, 2022, v. 72, n. 1, p. 61
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
10
Interpreting "Appropriate and Necessary" Reasonably under the Clean Air Act: Michigan v. Environmental Protection Agency.
- Published in:
- Ecology Law Quarterly, 2017, v. 44, n. 2, p. 535, doi. 10.15779/Z38QZ22G8H
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
11
RECENT DEVELOPMENTS.
- Published in:
- Journal of Land Use & Environmental Law, 2016, v. 31, n. 2, p. 313
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
12
POLICYMAKING BY PROPOSAL: HOW AGENCIES ARE TRANSFORMING INDUSTRY INVESTMENT LONG BEFORE RULES CAN BE TESTED IN COURT.
- Published in:
- George Mason Law Review, 2017, v. 24, n. 2, p. 497
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
13
WHAT'S IN A NUMBER: ARGUING ABOUT COST-BENEFIT ANALYSIS IN ADMINISTRATIVE LAW.
- Published in:
- Lewis & Clark Law Review, 2018, v. 22, n. 3, p. 923
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
14
THE PRICE OF REGULATION: RETHINKING EXECUTIVE REVIEW OF AGENCY RULEMAKING.
- Published in:
- Michigan State Law Review, 2016, v. 2016, n. 4, p. 1091
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
15
THE FLIP SIDE OF MICHIGAN V. EPA: ARE CUMULATIVE IMPACTS CENTRALLY RELEVANT?
- Published in:
- Utah Law Review, 2018, v. 2018, n. 1, p. 1
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
16
ALCHEMICAL RULEMAKING AND IDEOLOGICAL FRAMING: LESSONS FROM THE 40-YEAR BATTLE TO REGULATE MERCURY EMISSIONS FROM ELECTRIC POWER PLANTS.
- Published in:
- Natural Resources Journal, 2018, v. 58, n. 1, p. 125
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
17
A COST-BENEFIT ANALYSIS-BASED INTERPRETATION OF RECIPROCITY UNDER CLEAN AIR ACT SECTION 115(C).
- Published in:
- Virginia Law Review, 2017, v. 103, n. 7, p. 1561
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
18
Costs Before Regulation: Michigan v. EPA and the Implicit Prerequisite.
- Published in:
- American Journal of Trial Advocacy, 2016, v. 40, n. 1, p. 175
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article