Works matching Bush v. Gore
1
- George Washington Law Review, 2013, v. 81, n. 6, p. 1865
- Article
2
- Rhetoric & Public Affairs, 2001, v. 4, n. 4, p. 605, doi. 10.1353/rap.2001.0075
- Prosise, Theodore O.;
- Smith, Craig R.
- Article
3
- George Washington Law Review Arguendo, 2013, v. 81, n. 6, p. 1865
- Article
4
- Law & Philosophy, 2002, v. 21, n. 2, p. 165, doi. 10.2307/3505129
- Article
5
- Stanford Law Review, 2016, v. 68, n. 6, p. 1411
- Kang, Michael S.;
- Shepherd, Joanna M.
- Article
6
- Stanford Law Review, 2007, v. 60, n. 1, p. 1
- Article
7
- Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 2008, v. 38, n. 1, p. 234, doi. 10.1111/j.1559-1816.2008.00304.x
- Article
8
- Constitutional Commentary, 2002, v. 19, n. 3, p. 543
- Article
9
- e-Journal of Science & Technology, 2013, v. 8, n. 5, p. 1
- Article
10
- Text & Talk, 2016, v. 36, n. 4, p. 391, doi. 10.1515/text-2016-0018
- Article
12
- Case Western Reserve Law Review, 2012, v. 62, n. 4, p. 947
- Article
13
- Wake Forest Law Review, 2024, v. 59, n. 1, p. 61
- Kafker, Scott L.;
- Jacobs, Simon D.
- Article
14
- Law & Philosophy, 2002, v. 21, n. 2, p. 221, doi. 10.2307/3505131
- Sinnoti-Armstrong, Walter
- Article
15
- Law & Contemporary Problems, 2002, v. 65, n. 3, p. 7, doi. 10.2307/1192401
- Article
16
- St. Thomas Law Review, 2011, v. 23, n. 3, p. 449
- Article
17
- George Mason Law Review, 2020, v. 28, n. 1, p. 1
- Article
19
- St. Louis University Law Journal, 2012, v. 56, n. 3, p. 665
- Article
20
- Connecticut Law Review, 2013, v. 45, n. 5, p. 1
- Article
21
- Constitutional Commentary, 2008, v. 25, n. 2, p. 215
- Neuman, Gerald L.;
- Hatzis, Nicholas
- Article
22
- Constitutional Commentary, 2002, v. 19, n. 3, p. 571
- Article
23
- Constitutional Commentary, 2001, v. 18, n. 2, p. 403
- Article
24
- California Law Review, 2001, v. 89, n. 6, p. 1721, doi. 10.2307/3481248
- Article
25
- Villanova Law Review, 2006, v. 51, n. 1, p. 229
- Saphire, Richard B.;
- Moke, Paul
- Article
26
- Yale Law Journal, 2007, v. 116, n. 5, p. 1159, doi. 10.2307/20455752
- Article
27
- Journal of American History, 2001, v. 88, n. 2, p. 436, doi. 10.2307/2675099
- Article
28
- St. Thomas Law Review, 2011, v. 23, n. 3, p. 325
- Article
29
- St. Thomas Law Review, 2011, v. 23, n. 3, p. 461
- BOPP JR., JAMES;
- COLESON, RICHARD E.
- Article
30
- Indiana Law Review, 2010, v. 44, n. 2, p. 23
- Article
31
- Texas Review of Law & Politics, 2004, v. 9, n. 1, p. 105
- Article
32
- American Communication Journal, 2013, v. 15, n. 2, p. 17
- Article
33
- Political Behavior, 2007, v. 29, n. 3, p. 327, doi. 10.1007/s11109-006-9021-6
- Article
35
- George Washington Law Review Arguendo, 2013, v. 81, n. 6, p. 1836
- Article
36
- Indiana Law Journal, 2019, v. 94, n. 2, p. 451
- Article
37
- University of Memphis Law Review, 2014, v. 45, n. 2, p. 281
- LAMPARELLO, ADAM;
- MACLEAN, CHARLES E.
- Article
39
- William & Mary Law Review, 2018, v. 60, n. 2, p. 335
- BARNETT, CODY S.;
- DOUGLAS, JOSHUA A.
- Article
43
- Case Western Reserve Law Review, 2012, v. 62, n. 4, p. 941
- Article
44
- U.C. Davis Law Review, 2013, v. 47, n. 1, p. 343
- Article
45
- 2005
- Hasen, Richard L.;
- Schultz, David
- Book Review