Works matching Immigration law and the Supreme Court
1
- University of Cincinnati Law Review, 2018, v. 86, n. 1, p. 215
- Rodriguez, Kate Aschenbrenner
- Article
2
- UMKC Law Review, 2019, v. 87, n. 3, p. 549
- Article
3
- Cleveland State Law Review, 2012, v. 60, n. 1, p. 133
- Article
4
- Studia Iuridica Toruniensia, 2017, v. 21, p. 27, doi. 10.12775/SIT.2017.025
- Article
5
- Boston University Law Review, 2014, v. 94, n. 5, p. 1651
- Article
6
- Dalhousie Law Journal, 2019, v. 42, n. 1, p. 17
- Article
7
- Yale Law Journal, 2024, v. 134, n. 2, p. 329
- Article
8
- Contemporary Issues in Early Childhood, 2012, v. 13, n. 3, p. 161, doi. 10.2304/ciec.2012.13.3.161
- Article
9
- Family Law Quarterly, 2014, v. 48, n. 3, p. 539
- Article
10
- Brigham Young University Law Review, 2000, v. 2000, n. 4, p. 1551
- Article
11
- Dialog: A Journal of Theology, 2012, v. 51, n. 3, p. 179, doi. 10.1111/j.1540-6385.2012.00680.x
- Article
14
- Tennessee Journal of Law & Policy, 2013, v. 9, n. 1, p. 45
- Article
15
- Stanford Journal of Civil Rights & Civil Liberties, 2013, v. 9, n. 1, p. 1
- Article
16
- St. Mary's Law Journal, 2021, v. 52, n. 3, p. 1
- Article
18
- Cumberland Law Review, 2013, v. 43, n. 3, p. 591
- Article
19
- Cardozo Law Review, 2011, v. 33, n. 2, p. 347
- Article
20
- Southern California Law Review, 2012, v. 85, n. 3, p. 955
- Article
21
- Cornell Law Review, 2014, v. 99, n. 4, p. 925
- Article
22
- Hinckley Journal of Politics, 2013, v. 14, p. 41
- Article
23
- Berkeley Journal of Employment & Labor Law, 2012, v. 33, n. 1, p. 153
- Article
24
- California Legal History, 2015, v. 10, p. 238
- Article
25
- Washington University Law Review, 2020, v. 97, n. 4, p. 1179
- SAUCEDO, LETICIA;
- VILLAZOR, ROSE CUISON
- Article
26
- Washington University Law Review, 2012, v. 89, n. 6, p. 1269
- Article
27
- Valparaiso University Law Review, 2018, v. 52, n. 2, p. 231
- Article
28
- University of Chicago Law Review, 2013, v. 80, n. 1, p. 165
- Article
29
- New York University Law Review, 2013, v. 88, n. 6, p. 2074
- GULASEKARAM, PRATHEEPAN;
- RAMAKRISHNAN, S. KARTHICK
- Article
30
- Denver Law Review, 2023, v. 100, n. 3, p. 773
- Article
31
- Journal of the Legal Profession, 2011, v. 36, n. 1, p. 269
- Article
32
- Touro Law Review, 2022, v. 37, n. 4, p. 1
- Article
33
- Texas Law Review, 2001, v. 79, n. 4, p. 813
- Article
34
- Ohio State Law Journal, 2013, v. 74, n. 5, p. 703
- Article
35
- Latin American Law Review, 2020, n. 5, p. 159, doi. 10.29263/lar05.2020.08
- Article
36
- Journal of Education, 1904, v. 59, n. 21, p. 329
- Article
37
- International Journal of Discrimination & the Law, 2023, v. 23, n. 4, p. 321, doi. 10.1177/13582291231199370
- Article
38
- Harvard Law & Policy Review, 2015, v. 9, n. 2, p. 529
- Article
39
- Wisconsin International Law Journal, 2024, v. 41, n. 2, p. 187, doi. 10.59015/wilj.XRRS5261
- Article
40
- Wisconsin International Law Journal, 2024, v. 41, n. 2, p. 187
- Article
41
- New York Law School Law Review, 2005, v. 49, n. 4, p. 1145
- Article
42
- White House Studies, 2016, v. 16, n. 2/3, p. 169
- Manuel, Kate M.;
- Garcia, Michael John
- Article
43
- Journal of Law & Policy, 2015, v. 24, n. 1, p. 169
- Article
44
- Journal of Law & Policy, 2012, v. 20, n. 2, p. 677
- Article
45
- Bench & Bar of Minnesota, 2025, v. 82, n. 2, p. 37
- Article
46
- Duke Journal of Constitutional Law & Public Policy, 2013, v. 8, p. 1
- Article
47
- Vanderbilt Law Review, 2013, v. 66, n. 3, p. 723
- Abebe, Daniel;
- Huq, Aziz Z.
- Article
48
- Bench & Bar of Minnesota, 2022, v. 79, n. 5, p. 12
- Article
49
- Bench & Bar of Minnesota, 2017, v. 74, n. 7, p. 43
- Article
50
- Bench & Bar of Minnesota, 2015, v. 72, n. 6, p. 43
- Article