Resolving Civil Forfeiture Disputes.
- Published in:
- Kansas Law Review, 2017, v. 66, n. 2, p. 399
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
Works matching Forfeiture lawsuits
Results: 31
1
2
Criminal Forfeitures: The Supreme Court Gives Unbridled Discretion to Curtail the Sixth Amendment [Kaley v. United States, 134 S. Ct. 1090 (2014)].
- Published in:
- 2014
- By:
- Publication type:
- Opinion
3
Procedural Whipsaw: Allocating the Burden of Proving Reasonable Notice to Prisoners of Forfeiture Proceedings and the (Renewed) Call for Actual Notice.
- Published in:
- North Carolina Law Review, 2020, v. 99, n. 1, p. 247
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
4
PRELIMINARILY GUILTY? REFLEXIVE CONFRONTATION FORFEITURE.
- Published in:
- Creighton Law Review, 2016, v. 50, n. 1, p. 19
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
5
Pension Forfeiture Can Constitute a Fine.
- Published in:
- Benefits Quarterly, 2016, v. 32, n. 3, p. 53
- Publication type:
- Article
6
CIVIL FORFEITURE, CUSTOMS LAW, AND THE RECOVERY OF CULTURAL PROPERTY.
- Published in:
- DePaul Journal of Art, Technology & Intellectual Property Law, 2015, v. 25, n. 2, p. 335
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
7
United States v. Davis - 648 F.3D 84 (2d Cir. 2011).
- Published in:
- DePaul Journal of Art, Technology & Intellectual Property Law, 2011, v. 22, n. 1, p. 297
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
8
S Corporation Corner: The Austin Case: A Second Look at the Enforceability of Restricted Stock.
- Published in:
- Journal of Passthrough Entities, 2017, v. 20, n. 5, p. 37
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
9
CRIMINAL FORFEITURE AND THE SIXTH AMENDMENT: THE ROLE OF THE JURY AT COMMON LAW.
- Published in:
- Cardozo Law Review, 2013, v. 35, n. 1, p. 1
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
10
COMMERCIAL AND CONSUMER LAW.
- Published in:
- Bench & Bar of Minnesota, 2018, v. 75, n. 4, p. 32
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
11
REAL PROPERTY.
- Published in:
- Bench & Bar of Minnesota, 2018, v. 75, n. 1, p. 46
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
12
Poisonous Fruit & Civil Forfeiture.
- Published in:
- Bench & Bar of Minnesota, 2014, v. 71, n. 11, p. 18
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
13
The Constitutionality of Civil Forfeiture.
- Published in:
- Yale Law Journal, 2016, v. 125, n. 8, p. 2446
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
14
The inter-relationship between theft and POCA: is every thief also guilty of a money-laundering offence?: GH v R [2015] UKSC 24.
- Published in:
- Journal of Criminal Law, 2015, v. 79, n. 3, p. 165, doi. 10.1177/0022018315591132
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
15
Who Obtains a Benefit Under the Proceeds of Crime Act 2002 and What Is Its Value?: R v Roper [2014] EWCA Crim 2476.
- Published in:
- Journal of Criminal Law, 2015, v. 79, n. 3, p. 157, doi. 10.1177/0022018315589030a
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
16
Criminal Wealth Law: From Maple Syrup to Hells Angels and Unexplained Wealth Orders.
- Published in:
- Manitoba Law Journal, 2023, v. 46, n. 4, p. 1
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
17
Forfeiture of Assets at the International Criminal Court.
- Published in:
- Journal of International Criminal Justice, 2014, v. 12, n. 2, p. 193, doi. 10.1093/jicj/mqu013
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
18
Removing Interpretative Barnacles: Counterclaims and Civil Forfeiture.
- Published in:
- University of Chicago Law Review, 2021, v. 88, n. 4, p. 937
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
19
THE GOVERNMENT OF CANADA (Applicant) v. THE GOVERNMENT OF THE UNITED STATES (Respondent).
- Published in:
- Canada-United States Law Journal, 2013, v. 38, n. 1/2, p. 33
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
20
THE GOVERNMENT OF CANADA (Applicant) v. THE GOVERNMENT OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA (Respondent) MEMORIAL OF THE RESPONDENT.
- Published in:
- Canada-United States Law Journal, 2013, v. 38, n. 1/2, p. 61
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
21
CONFRONTING FORFEITURE.
- Published in:
- Washington University Law Review, 2019, v. 96, n. 5, p. 1113
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
22
Untangling Laundered Funds: The Tracing Requirement Under 18 U.S.C. § 1957.
- Published in:
- Stanford Law Review, 2023, v. 75, n. 5, p. 1157
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
23
DEVELOPMENTS IN INDIANA APPELLATE PROCEDURE: RULE AMENDMENTS, REMARKABLE CASE LAW, AND COURT GUIDANCE FOR APPELLATE PRACTITIONERS.
- Published in:
- Indiana Law Review, 2015, v. 48, n. 4, p. 1173, doi. 10.18060/4806.0038
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
24
IMPOSING INDIGENCE: RECLAIMING THE QUALIFIED RIGHT TO COUNSEL OF CHOICE IN CRIMINAL ASSET FORFEITURE CASES.
- Published in:
- 2014
- By:
- Publication type:
- Opinion
25
Clarifying Forfeiture Theory in Response to Dempsey and Lang.
- Published in:
- Criminal Law & Philosophy, 2020, v. 14, n. 2, p. 215, doi. 10.1007/s11572-020-09531-y
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
26
Reasons for Punishment: A Study in Philosophical Translation (Or, Why Sadistic Punishment is Morally Impermissible).
- Published in:
- Criminal Law & Philosophy, 2020, v. 14, n. 2, p. 189, doi. 10.1007/s11572-019-09502-y
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
27
Forfeiture and the Right to a Fair Trial.
- Published in:
- Criminal Law & Philosophy, 2020, v. 14, n. 2, p. 203, doi. 10.1007/s11572-019-09497-6
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
28
TO CURB OR NOT TO CURB: APPLYING HONEYCUTT TO THE JUDICIAL OVERREACH OF MONEY JUDGMENT FORFEITURES.
- Published in:
- University of Baltimore Law Review, 2019, v. 48, n. 2, p. 271
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
29
THE DURYODHANA DILEMMA: UNITED STATES V. A 10TH CENTURY CAMBODIAN SANDSTONE SCULPTURE AND A PROPOSED CODE OF ETHICS-BASED RESPONSE TO REPATRIATION REQUESTS FOR AUCTION HOUSES.
- Published in:
- University of Pennsylvania Law Review, 2014, v. 163, n. 1, p. 249
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
30
Nunavut.
- Published in:
- Canadian Parliamentary Review / Revue Parlementaire Canadienne, 2018, v. 41, n. 1, p. 52
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
31
DISCIPLINE.
- Published in:
- Advocate (05154987), 2016, v. 59, n. 8, p. 17
- Publication type:
- Article