Works matching Appellate jurisdiction
2
- ICSID Review: Foreign Investment Law Journal, 2017, v. 32, n. 3, p. 595, doi. 10.1093/icsidreview/six021
- Article
3
- Akron Law Review, 2019, v. 53, n. 3, p. 659
- Article
4
- Journal of International Dispute Settlement, 2014, v. 5, n. 2, p. 406, doi. 10.1093/jnlids/idu009
- Article
5
- Missouri Law Review, 2024, v. 88, n. 4, p. 1231
- Article
6
- Chicago-Kent Law Review, 2017, v. 92, n. 2, p. 679
- Article
7
- Acta Universitatis Danubius: Juridica, 2015, v. 11, n. 1, p. 38
- Article
8
- Round Table, 2024, v. 113, n. 6, p. 533, doi. 10.1080/00358533.2024.2439672
- Augustin-Joseph, Rahym R.
- Article
9
- Villanova Law Review, 2018, v. 63, n. 2, p. 189
- Article
10
- Penn State Law Review, 2021, v. 126, n. 1, p. 123
- Article
11
- Washington Law Review, 2018, v. 93, n. 4, p. 1809
- Article
12
- George Washington Law Review, 2015, v. 83, n. 2, p. 686
- Article
13
- George Washington Law Review, 2015, v. 83, n. 2, p. 686
- Article
14
- Georgia Law Review, 2018, v. 52, n. 3, p. 767
- Article
15
- Florida Bar Journal, 2019, v. 93, n. 1, p. 56
- Article
16
- Bench & Bar of Minnesota, 2023, v. 80, n. 7, p. 43
- Article
17
- Dispute Resolution Journal, 2012, v. 67, n. 3, p. 11
- Article
18
- Dispute Resolution Journal, 2005, v. 60, n. 4, p. 92
- Article
22
- Villanova Law Review, 2024, v. 69, n. 2, p. 271
- Article
23
- Mercer Law Review, 2016, v. 68, n. 1, p. 321
- Article
24
- Mercer Law Review, 2011, v. 62, n. 4, p. 1071
- Article
25
- Akron Law Review, 2019, v. 53, n. 3, p. 639
- Article
26
- American University International Law Review, 2012, v. 27, n. 4, p. 727
- FRIEDLAND, PAUL;
- BRUMPTON, PAUL
- Article
27
- Journal of Supreme Court History, 2023, v. 48, n. 2, p. 174, doi. 10.1353/sch.2023.a901538
- Article
28
- Cleveland State Law Review, 2022, v. 71, n. 1, p. 19
- Article
29
- Publius: The Journal of Federalism, 2018, v. 48, n. 2, p. 269, doi. 10.1093/publius/pjx047
- Article
30
- Arbitration International, 2015, v. 31, n. 1, p. 171, doi. 10.1093/arbint/aiv031
- Article
31
- Scottish Historical Review, 2012, v. 91, n. 1, p. 76, doi. 10.3366/shr.2012.0072
- Jackson, Clare;
- Glennie, Patricia
- Article
32
- Nevada Law Journal, 2015, v. 15, n. 3., p. 1351
- Article
33
- Ohio State Law Journal, 2013, v. 74, n. 3, p. 423
- Article
35
- Georgia State University Law Review, 2016, v. 33, n. 1, p. 205
- Janflone, Bryan;
- Williford, Michael F.
- Article
36
- Northwestern University Law Review, 2020, v. 114, n. 7, p. 1771
- Article
37
- Human Rights Law Review, 2018, v. 18, n. 1, p. 170, doi. 10.1093/hrlr/ngx039
- Article
38
- Hamline Law Review, 2013, v. 36, n. 3, p. 399
- Article
39
- Florida Bar Journal, 2021, v. 95, n. 5, p. 32
- Jones, Kimberly M.;
- Busvek, Alexander A.;
- Bowers, Blaze M.
- Article
40
- Florida Bar Journal, 2013, v. 87, n. 10, p. 30
- Article
41
- International Insolvency Review, 2019, v. 28, n. 3, p. 392, doi. 10.1002/iir.1355
- Baister, Stephen;
- Tribe, John
- Article
42
- Columbia Journal of Transnational Law, 2019, v. 57, n. 2, p. 283
- DIXON, ROSALIND;
- JACKSON, VICKI
- Article
43
- Columbia Law Review, 2022, v. 122, n. 3, p. 793
- Article
44
- California Legal History, 2019, v. 14, p. 339
- Article
45
- California Legal History, 2019, v. 14, p. 298
- Article
46
- Golden Gate University Law Review, 2015, v. 45, n. 3, p. 193
- Article
47
- Arbitration Journal, 1993, v. 48, n. 2, p. 90
- Article
48
- IDEA: The Intellectual Property Law Review, 2012, v. 52, n. 3, p. 379
- Article
50
- Alabama Lawyer, 2021, v. 82, n. 6, p. 444
- Article