Works matching DE "LEGAL status of criminal defendants"
1
- Michigan Law Review, 2017, v. 116, n. 1, p. 75, doi. 10.36644/mlr.116.1.federal
- Article
2
- Indiana Law Journal, 2017, v. 92, n. 3, p. 901
- Article
3
- Boston University Law Review, 2021, v. 101, n. 5, p. 1667
- BAMBAUER, JANE;
- ROTH, ANDREA
- Article
4
- Emory Law Journal, 2021, v. 70, n. 4, p. 905
- Article
5
- Albany Law Review, 2017, v. 81, n. 4, p. 1185
- Article
6
- Southern Illinois University Law Journal, 2020, v. 44, n. 4, p. 627
- Article
7
- William & Mary Law Review, 2018, v. 59, n. 6, p. 2575
- Article
8
- Denver Law Review, 2019, v. 96, n. 3, p. 733
- Article
9
- Denver Law Review, 2016, v. 93, n. 3, p. 595
- NELSON, KRISTEN;
- BRADY, TAMARA;
- KING, DANIEL
- Article
10
- Journal of Supreme Court History, 2015, v. 40, n. 2, p. 203, doi. 10.1353/sch.2015.0017
- Article
11
- California Law Review, 2021, v. 109, n. 3, p. 1231, doi. 10.15779/Z38VH5CJ86
- Article
12
- California Law Review, 2018, v. 106, n. 4, p. 1379, doi. 10.15779/Z38N58CM0D
- Article
13
- California Law Review, 2017, v. 105, n. 1, p. 179, doi. 10.15779/Z38S27M
- Article
14
- Suffolk Transnational Law Review, 2020, v. 43, n. 2, p. 255
- Article
15
- Vermont Law Review, 2016, v. 41, n. 2, p. 279
- Plummer, Caitlin M.;
- Syed, Imran J.
- Article
16
- North Carolina Law Review, 2024, v. 102, n. 3, p. 753
- ROTHSTEIN, PAUL F.;
- COLEMAN, RONALD J.
- Article
17
- North Carolina Law Review, 2015, v. 93, n. 5, p. 1419
- Article
18
- Idaho Law Review, 2016, v. 52, n. 2, p. 669
- Article
19
- Florida Bar Journal, 2018, v. 92, n. 2, p. 26
- Article
20
- Wake Forest Law Review, 2017, v. 52, n. 2, p. 293
- Article
21
- Wake Forest Law Review, 2014, v. 49, n. 5, p. 1375
- Article
22
- Cornell Law Review, 2017, v. 102, n. 2, p. 413
- Smith, Robert J.;
- Robinson, Zoë
- Article
23
- 2014
- Blume, John H.;
- Helm, Rebecca K.
- Essay
24
- Cornell Law Review, 2014, v. 99, n. 5, p. 981
- Fairfield, Joshua A. T.;
- Luna, Erik
- Article
25
- New York University Law Review, 2014, v. 89, n. 5, p. 1836
- Article
26
- New York University Law Review, 2013, v. 88, n. 6, p. 2319
- Article
27
- George Washington Law Review, 2016, v. 84, n. 2, p. 417
- Article
28
- Urban Lawyer, 2014, v. 46, n. 1, p. 1
- Article
29
- Vanderbilt Law Review, 2020, v. 73, n. 2, p. 535
- Article
30
- Vanderbilt Law Review, 2017, v. 70, n. 6, p. 1939
- Heise, Michael;
- King, Nancy J.;
- Heise, Nicole A.
- Article
31
- Vanderbilt Law Review, 2016, v. 69, n. 3, p. 803
- Article
32
- UMKC Law Review, 2015, v. 84, n. 2, p. 411
- Wood, Stacey;
- Agharkar, Bhushan S.
- Article
33
- Southern California Law Review, 2017, v. 90, n. 6, p. 1299
- Article
34
- Southern California Law Review, 2016, v. 89, n. 5, p. 1243
- Article
35
- San Diego Law Review, 2013, v. 50, n. 2, p. 469
- Article
36
- Jurimetrics: The Journal of Law, Science & Technology, 2019, v. 59, n. 4, p. 439
- Finkelstein, Michael O.;
- Levin, Bruce
- Article
37
- University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform, 2015, v. 48, n. 2, p. 347
- Article
38
- William Mitchell Law Review, 2015, v. 41, n. 3, p. 948
- Article
39
- William Mitchell Law Review, 2013, v. 39, n. 5, p. 1552
- Article
40
- William Mitchell Law Review, 2013, v. 39, n. 1, p. 306
- Article
41
- William Mitchell Law Review, 2012, v. 38, n. 1, p. 306
- Article
43
- Minnesota Law Review, 2018, v. 103, n. 2, p. 521
- Article
44
- Minnesota Law Review, 2015, v. 99, n. 5, p. 1935
- Article
45
- Yale Law Journal, 2014, v. 123, n. 4, p. 1014
- Article
46
- Journal of Criminal Law, 2019, v. 83, n. 3, p. 195, doi. 10.1177/0022018319829265
- Article
47
- Touro Law Review, 2017, v. 33, n. 2, p. 489
- Article
48
- Touro Law Review, 2013, v. 29, n. 3, p. 839
- Article
49
- Temple Law Review, 2013, v. 86, n. 1, p. 149
- Article
50
- Syracuse Law Review, 2014, v. 65, n. 1, p. 191
- Article