We found a match
Your institution may have access to this item. Find your institution then sign in to continue.
- Title
Non-financial conflicts of interest in academic grant evaluation: a qualitative study of multiple stakeholders in France.
- Authors
Abdoul, Hendy; Perrey, Christophe; Tubach, Florence; Amiel, Philippe; Durand-Zaleski, Isabelle; Alberti, Corinne
- Abstract
Peer review is the most widely used method for evaluating grant applications in clinical research. Criticisms of peer review include lack of equity, suspicion of biases, and conflicts of interest (CoI). CoIs raise questions of fairness, transparency, and trust in grant allocation. Few observational studies have assessed these issues. We report the results of a qualitative study on reviewers' and applicants' perceptions and experiences of CoIs in reviews of French academic grant applications.
- Publication
PloS one, 2012, Vol 7, Issue 4, pe35247
- ISSN
1932-6203
- Publication type
Journal Article
- DOI
10.1371/journal.pone.0035247