We found a match
Your institution may have access to this item. Find your institution then sign in to continue.
- Title
Clustered environments and randomized genes: a fundamental distinction between conventional and genetic epidemiology.
- Authors
Smith, George Davey; Lawlor, Debbie A; Harbord, Roger; Timpson, Nic; Day, Ian; Ebrahim, Shah
- Abstract
In conventional epidemiology confounding of the exposure of interest with lifestyle or socioeconomic factors, and reverse causation whereby disease status influences exposure rather than vice versa, may invalidate causal interpretations of observed associations. Conversely, genetic variants should not be related to the confounding factors that distort associations in conventional observational epidemiological studies. Furthermore, disease onset will not influence genotype. Therefore, it has been suggested that genetic variants that are known to be associated with a modifiable (nongenetic) risk factor can be used to help determine the causal effect of this modifiable risk factor on disease outcomes. This approach, mendelian randomization, is increasingly being applied within epidemiological studies. However, there is debate about the underlying premise that associations between genotypes and disease outcomes are not confounded by other risk factors. We examined the extent to which genetic variants, on the one hand, and nongenetic environmental exposures or phenotypic characteristics on the other, tend to be associated with each other, to assess the degree of confounding that would exist in conventional epidemiological studies compared with mendelian randomization studies.
- Publication
PLoS medicine, 2007, Vol 4, Issue 12, pe352
- ISSN
1549-1676
- Publication type
Journal Article
- DOI
10.1371/journal.pmed.0040352