We found a match
Your institution may have access to this item. Find your institution then sign in to continue.
- Title
Reciprocity is not give and take: asymmetric reciprocity to positive and negative acts.
- Authors
Keysar, Boaz; Converse, Benjamin A; Wang, Jiunwen; Epley, Nicholas
- Abstract
Unlike economic exchange, social exchange has no well-defined "value." It is based on the norm of reciprocity, in which giving and taking are to be repaid in equivalent measure. Although giving and taking are colloquially assumed to be equivalent actions, we demonstrate that they produce different patterns of reciprocity. In five experiments utilizing a dictator game, people reciprocated in like measure to apparently prosocial acts of giving, but reciprocated more selfishly to apparently antisocial acts of taking, even when the objective outcomes of the acts of giving and taking were identical. Additional results demonstrate that acts of giving in social exchanges are perceived as more generous than objectively identical acts of taking, that taking tends to escalate, and that the asymmetry in reciprocity is not due to gaining versus losing resources. Reciprocity appears to operate on an exchange rate that assigns value to the meaning of events, in a fashion that encourages prosocial exchanges.
- Publication
Psychological science, 2008, Vol 19, Issue 12, p1280
- ISSN
1467-9280
- Publication type
Journal Article
- DOI
10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02223.x