We found a match
Your institution may have access to this item. Find your institution then sign in to continue.
- Title
Fallibility in estimating direct effects.
- Authors
Cole, Stephen R; Hernán, Miguel A
- Abstract
We use causal graphs and a partly hypothetical example from the Physicians' Health Study to explain why a common standard method for quantifying direct effects (i.e. stratifying on the intermediate variable) may be flawed. Estimating direct effects without bias requires that two assumptions hold, namely the absence of unmeasured confounding for (1) exposure and outcome, and (2) the intermediate variable and outcome. Recommendations include collecting and incorporating potential confounders for the causal effect of the mediator on the outcome, as well as the causal effect of the exposure on the outcome, and clearly stating the additional assumption that there is no unmeasured confounding for the causal effect of the mediator on the outcome.
- Publication
International journal of epidemiology, 2002, Vol 31, Issue 1, p163
- ISSN
0300-5771
- Publication type
Journal Article
- DOI
10.1093/ije/31.1.163