Saproxylic beetles respond to habitat variables at different spatial scales depending on variable type and species' mobility: the need for multi-scale forest structure management.

Winiger, Nathalie; Hendel, Anna-Lena; Ganz, Selina; Zielewska-Büttner, Katarzyna; Segelbacher, Gernot; Braunisch, Veronika

The response of species to the environment is scale-dependent and the spatial scale at which this relationships are measured may affect conservation recommendations. Saproxylic beetles depend on decaying- and deadwood which occur in lower quantities in managed compared to natural forests. Most studies have investigated the habitat selection of saproxylic beetles at the stand scale, however depending on the species mobility, the amounts and distribution of forest attributes across the landscape may be equally important, and thus crucial to frame quantitative conservation targets. To address this gap, we evaluated the influence of environmental variables, derived from remote sensing across multiple spatial scales (50, 100, 250, 500 and 1000 m radius), on saproxylic beetles habitat selection. Focusing on four mobile and four flightless species, we hypothesized that mobile species respond to habitat variables at broader scales compared to flightless species, and that variables describing forest structure explain species presence better at smaller scales than variables describing other landscape features. Forest structure variables explained around 40% of the habitat selection, followed by variables describing forest type, topography and climate. Contrary to our expectations, mobile species responded to variables at smaller scales than flightless species. Saproxylic beetle species therefore respond to the availability of habitat features at spatial scales that are inversely related to their dispersal capacities, suggesting that less mobile species require larger areas with suitable habitat characteristics while mobile species can also make use of small, distributed patches with locally concentrated habitat features.

HABITATS; FOREST management; HABITAT selection; BEETLES; SPECIES; REMOTE sensing

Biodiversity & Conservation, 2023, Vol 32, Issue 10, p3355

0960-3115

Academic Journal

10.1007/s10531-023-02663-2