Works matching United States v. Windsor
1
- Elon Law Review, 2014, v. 6, n. 2, p. 323
- Article
2
- Elon Law Review, 2014, v. 6, n. 2, p. 269
- Article
3
- St. Thomas Law Review, 2013, v. 26, n. 1, p. 1
- BARNHARDT, MELISSA LADER;
- LILLESAND, JESSICA M.;
- LETTALI, DENISE A.
- Article
4
- Cleveland State Law Review, 2014, v. 62, n. 1, p. 1
- Article
5
- Valparaiso University Law Review, 2014, v. 48, n. 3, p. 695
- Archibald, Catherine Jean
- Article
6
- Journal of Legal Studies Education, 2014, v. 31, n. 2, p. 249, doi. 10.1111/jlse.12016
- Article
7
- California Law Review, 2014, v. 102, n. 4, p. 971
- Article
8
- U.C. Davis Law Review, 2014, v. 48, n. 2, p. 505
- Article
9
- Modern American, 2013, v. 9, n. 1, p. 8
- Article
10
- Cato Supreme Court Review, 2012, p. 117
- Young, Ernest A.;
- Blondel, Erin C.
- Article
11
- Cato Supreme Court Review, 2012, p. 95
- Article
12
- Journal of Gender, Race & Justice, 2014, v. 17, n. 3, p. 467
- Washington, Tanya;
- Smith, Catherine;
- Pollvogt, Susannah
- Article
13
- Review of Banking & Financial Law, 2014, v. 33, n. 2, p. 462
- Article
15
- Case Western Reserve Law Review, 2014, v. 64, n. 4, p. 1293
- Article
16
- Case Western Reserve Law Review, 2014, v. 64, n. 3, p. 1293
- Article
17
- Case Western Reserve Law Review, 2014, v. 64, n. 3, p. 823
- Article
18
- Loyola Maritime Law Journal, 2015, v. 14, n. 2, p. 408
- Article
19
- Benefits Quarterly, 2014, v. 30, n. 1, p. 58
- Schwallie, Daniel P.;
- Steinberg, Allen
- Article
20
- University of Pittsburgh Law Review, 2014, v. 76, n. 1, p. 1, doi. 10.5195/lawreview.2014.318
- Article
21
- Hofstra Law Review, 2014, v. 42, n. 4, p. 1045
- Article
22
- South Dakota Law Review, 2015, v. 60, n. 3, p. 409
- Article
23
- Columbia Journal of Gender & Law, 2015, v. 29, n. 1, p. 85
- Article
24
- Journal of Human Resources, 2025, v. 60, n. 1, p. 1
- Article
25
- University of Colorado Law Review, 2014, v. 85, n. 4, p. 935
- Article
26
- George Mason University Civil Rights Law Journal, 2014, v. 24, n. 3, p. 263
- Article
27
- Elon Law Review, 2014, v. 6, n. 2, p. 375
- Article
28
- Oxford Journal of Law & Religion, 2013, v. 2, n. 2, p. 469, doi. 10.1093/ojlr/rwt038
- Thayer, Donlu;
- Worley, Michael
- Article
29
- Journal of Law & Policy, 2019, v. 27, n. 2, p. 327
- Article
30
- BYU Journal of Public Law, 2015, v. 29, n. 2, p. 299
- Article
31
- Loyola Journal of Public Interest Law, 2014, v. 16, n. 1, p. 239
- Wallace, Monica Hof;
- Otten, Christopher Gerald
- Article
32
- Ave Maria Law Review, 2015, v. 13, n. 2, p. 281
- Article
33
- Maryland Law Review, 2015, v. 75, n. 1, p. 271
- Article
34
- Boston University Law Review, 2016, v. 96, n. 4, p. 1489
- Article
35
- Boston University Law Review, 2015, v. 95, n. 3, p. 891
- Article
36
- Boston University Law Review, 2015, v. 95, n. 2, p. 641
- Article
37
- Boston University Law Review, 2015, v. 95, n. 2, p. 587
- Article
39
- Boston University Law Review, 2014, v. 94, n. 2, p. 367
- Article
40
- University of Chicago Legal Forum, 2015, p. 211
- Article
41
- Michigan State Law Review, 2013, v. 2013, n. 4, p. 1449
- Article
42
- Michigan State Law Review, 2013, v. 2013, n. 4, p. 1385
- Article
43
- Michigan State Law Review, 2013, v. 2013, n. 4, p. 967
- Article
44
- DePaul Law Review, 2014, v. 64, n. 1, p. 113
- Lamparello, Adam;
- MacLean, Charles E.
- Article
45
- Yale Law Journal, 2015, v. 125, n. 2, p. 533
- Article
46
- William & Mary Law Review, 2014, v. 55, n. 6, p. 2171
- Article
47
- Columbia Human Rights Law Review, 2014, v. 45, n. 2, p. 441
- Article
48
- Columbia Human Rights Law Review, 2013, v. 45, n. 1, p. 100
- Article
49
- Family Law Quarterly, 2014, v. 48, n. 3, p. 539
- Article
50
- Family Law Quarterly, 2014, v. 48, n. 3, p. 375
- Article