Rice Height Monitoring between Different Estimation Models Using UAV Photogrammetry and Multispectral Technology.

Lu, Wenyi; Okayama, Tsuyoshi; Komatsuzaki, Masakazu

Unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) photogrammetry was used to monitor crop height in a flooded paddy field. Three multi-rotor UAVs were utilized to conduct flight missions in order to capture RGB (RedGreenBlue) and multispectral images, and these images were analyzed using several different models to provide the best results. Two image sets taken by two UAVs, mounted with RGB cameras of the same resolution and Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS) receivers of different accuracies, were applied to perform photogrammetry. Two methods were then proposed for creating crop height models (CHMs), one of which was denoted as the M1 method and was based on the Digital Surface Point Cloud (DSPC) and the Digital Terrain Point Cloud (DSPT). The other was denoted as the M2 method and was based on the DSPC and a bathymetric sensor. An image set taken by another UAV mounted with a multispectral camera was used for multispectral-based photogrammetry. A Normal Differential Vegetation Index (NDVI) and a Vegetation Fraction (VF) were then extracted. A new method based on multiple linear regression (MLR) combining the NDVI, the VF, and a Soil Plant Analysis Development (SPAD) value for estimating the measured height (MH) of rice was then proposed and denoted as the M3 method. The results show that the M1 method, the UAV with a GNSS receiver with a higher accuracy, obtained more reliable estimations, while the M2 method, the UAV with a GNSS receiver of moderate accuracy, was actually slightly better. The effect on the performance of CHMs created by the M1 and M2 methods is more negligible in different plots with different treatments; however, remarkably, the more uniform the distribution of vegetation over the water surface, the better the performance. The M3 method, which was created using only a SPAD value and a canopy NDVI value, showed the highest coefficient of determination ( R 2 ) for overall MH estimation, 0.838, compared with other combinations.

GLOBAL Positioning System; PHOTOGRAMMETRY; MULTISPECTRAL imaging; PADDY fields; DRONE aircraft

Remote Sensing, 2022, Vol 14, Issue 1, p78

2072-4292

Academic Journal

10.3390/rs14010078